Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (110)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hobart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hobart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 124, No. 5, 962-973, May 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)

A new patient-based outcome measure

Jeremy Hobart1, Donna Lamping2, Ray Fitzpatrick3, Afsane Riazi1 and Alan Thompson1

1 Neurological Outcome Measures Unit, Institute of Neurology, London, 2 Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and 3 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Jeremy Hobart, Neurological Outcome Measures Unit, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK E-mail: J.Hobart@ion.ucl.ac.uk

Changes in health policy have underlined the importance of evidence-based clinical practice and rigorous evaluation of patient-based outcomes. As patient-based outcome measurement is particularly important in treatment trials of multiple sclerosis, a number of disease-specific instruments have been developed recently. One limitation of these instruments is that none was developed using the standard psychometric approach of reducing a large item pool generated from people with multiple sclerosis. Consequently, an outcome measure for clinical trials of multiple sclerosis that is disease specific and combines patient perspective with rigorous psychometric methods will complement existing instruments. The aim of this study was to develop such a measure. Standard psychometric methods were used. A pool of 129 questionnaire items was generated from interviews with 30 people with multiple sclerosis, expert opinion and literature review. The questionnaire was administered by postal survey to 1530 people selected randomly from the Multiple Sclerosis Society membership database. Redundant items and those with limited measurement properties were removed. The remaining items (n = 41) were grouped into scales using factor analysis, and then refined to form the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), an instrument measuring the physical (20 items) and psychological (nine items) impact of multiple sclerosis. Five psychometric properties of the MSIS-29 (data quality, scaling assumptions, acceptability, reliability and validity) were examined in a separate postal survey of 1250 Multiple Sclerosis Society members. A preliminary responsiveness study of the MSIS-29 was undertaken in 55 people admitted for rehabilitation and intravenous steroid treatment of relapses. The MSIS-29 satisfied all psychometric criteria. Data quality was excellent, missing data were low (maximum 3.9%), item test–re-test reliability was high (r = 0.65–0.90) and scale scores could be generated for >98% of respondents. Item descriptive statistics, item convergent and discriminant validity, and factor analysis indicated that it was legitimate to generate scores for MSIS-29 scales by summing items. MSIS-29 scales showed good variability, small floor and ceiling effects, high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha <=0.91) and high test–re-test reliability (intraclass correlation <=0.87). Correlations with other measures and the analysis of group differences provided evidence that the MSIS-29 measures the physical and psychological impact of multiple sclerosis. Effect sizes (physical scale = 0.82, psychological scale = 0.66) demonstrated preliminary evidence of good responsiveness. These results indicate the MSIS-29 is a clinically useful and scientifically sound patient-based outcome measure of the impact of multiple sclerosis suitable for clinical trials and epidemiological studies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. Martinez-Martin, C. Rodriguez-Blazquez, K. Abe, K. B. Bhattacharyya, B. R. Bloem, F. J. Carod-Artal, R. Prakash, R.A.J. Esselink, C. Falup-Pecurariu, M. Gallardo, et al.
International study on the psychometric attributes of the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale in Parkinson disease
Neurology, November 10, 2009; 73(19): 1584 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
C. Hughes, S. Smyth, and A. Lowe-Strong
Reflexology for the treatment of pain in people with multiple sclerosis: a double-blind randomised sham-controlled clinical trial
Multiple Sclerosis, November 1, 2009; 15(11): 1329 - 1338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
J. Wesson, J. Cooper, L. Jehle, S. Lockhart, K. Draney, and J. Barber
The functional index for living with multiple sclerosis: development and validation of a new quality of life questionnaire
Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2009; 15(10): 1239 - 1249.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Giordano, E Pucci, P Naldi, L Mendozzi, C Milanese, F Tronci, M Leone, N Mascoli, L La Mantia, G Giuliani, et al.
Responsiveness of patient reported outcome measures in multiple sclerosis relapses: the REMS study
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2009; 80(9): 1023 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
F. Schyns, L. Paul, K. Finlay, C. Ferguson, and E. Noble
Vibration therapy in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study exploring its effects on tone, muscle force, sensation and functional performance
Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2009; 23(9): 771 - 781.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
L. Doward, S. McKenna, D. Meads, J Twiss, and B. Eckert
The development of patient-reported outcome indices for multiple sclerosis (PRIMUS)
Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2009; 15(9): 1092 - 1102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
S. Broadley, D Vanags, B Williams, B Johnson, D Feeney, L Griffiths, S Shakib, G Brown, A Coulthard, P Mullins, et al.
Results of a phase IIa clinical trial of an anti-inflammatory molecule, chaperonin 10, in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, March 1, 2009; 15(3): 329 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
O. Gray, G. McDonnell, and S. Hawkins
Tried and tested: the psychometric properties of the multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29) in a population-based study
Multiple Sclerosis, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 75 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
F Khan, J F Pallant, C Brand, and T J Kilpatrick
Effectiveness of rehabilitation intervention in persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2008; 79(11): 1230 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. E. Cavanna, A. Schrag, D. Morley, M. Orth, M. M. Robertson, E. Joyce, H. D. Critchley, and C. Selai
The Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome-Quality of Life Scale (GTS-QOL): Development and validation
Neurology, October 28, 2008; 71(18): 1410 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rehabil Couns BullHome page
M. Bishop, M. P. Frain, and M. K. Tschopp
Self-Management, Perceived Control, and Subjective Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study
Rehabil Couns Bull, October 1, 2008; 52(1): 45 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. P Donnellan and J. Shanley
Comparison of the effect of two types of acupuncture on quality of life in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a preliminary single-blind randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2008; 22(3): 195 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. McCullagh, A. P Fitzgerald, R. P Murphy, and G. Cooke
Long-term benefits of exercising on quality of life and fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients with mild disability: a pilot study
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2008; 22(3): 206 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
L. Costelloe, K. O'Rourke, C. McGuigan, C. Walsh, N. Tubridy, and M. Hutchinson
The longitudinal relationship between the patient-reported Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale and the clinician-assessed Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite
Multiple Sclerosis, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 255 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M. Simeoni, P. Auquier, O. Fernandez, P. Flachenecker, S. Stecchi, C. Constantinescu, E. Idiman, A. Boyko, A. Beiske, T. Vollmer, et al.
Validation of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire
Multiple Sclerosis, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 219 - 230.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
L. Contelloe and M. Hutchinson
Is a 20% change in MSFC components clinically meaningful?
Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2007; 13(8): 1076 - 1076.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
L. Costelloe, K. O'Rourke, H. Kearney, C. McGuigan, L. Gribbin, M. Duggan, L. Daly, N. Tubridy, and M. Hutchinson
The patient knows best: significant change in the physical component of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 physical)
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 78(8): 841 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Forbes, A. While, and L. Mathes
Informal carer activities, carer burden and health status in multiple sclerosis
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2007; 21(6): 563 - 575.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
B. Giesser, J. Beres-Jones, A. Budovitch, E. Herlihy, and S. Harkema
Locomotor training using body weight support on a treadmill improves mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study
Multiple Sclerosis, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 224 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
T E Sherman, L J Rapport, R A Hanks, K A Ryan, P A Keenan, O Khan, and R P Lisak
Predictors of well-being among significant others of persons with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 238 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
P Ayatollahi, S Nafissi, M R Eshraghian, H Kaviani, and A Tarazi
Impact of depression and disability on quality of life in Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 275 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
V. de Groot, H. Beckerman, B. M. J. Uitdehaag, H. C. W. de Vet, G. J. Lankhorst, C. H. Polman, and L. M. Bouter
The usefulness of evaluative outcome measures in patients with multiple sclerosis
Brain, October 1, 2006; 129(10): 2648 - 2659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
J J Kragt, F A. van der Linden, J M Nielsen, B M. Uitdehaag, and C H Polman
Clinical impact of 20% worsening on Timed 25-foot Walk and 9-hole Peg Test in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 594 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. Schrag, C. Selai, N. Quinn, A. Lees, I. Litvan, A. Lang, Y. Poon, J. Bower, D. Burn, and J. Hobart
Measuring quality of life in PSP: The PSP-QoL.
Neurology, July 11, 2006; 67(1): 39 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Forbes, A. While, L. Mathes, and P. Griffiths
Health problems and health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2006; 20(1): 67 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. C. Hobart, A. Riazi, A. J. Thompson, I. M. Styles, W. Ingram, P. J. Vickery, M. Warner, P. J. Fox, and J. P. Zajicek
Getting the measure of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: the Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88)
Brain, January 1, 2006; 129(1): 224 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J C Hobart, A Riazi, D L Lamping, R Fitzpatrick, and A J Thompson
How responsive is the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)? A comparison with some other self report scales
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2005; 76(11): 1539 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
C. Heffernan and C. Jenkinson
Review Paper: Measuring outcomes for neurological disorders: a review of disease-specific health status instruments for three degenerative neurological conditions
Chronic Illness, June 1, 2005; 1(2): 131 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. H.S.R. Roxburgh, S. R. Seaman, T. Masterman, A. E. Hensiek, S. J. Sawcer, S. Vukusic, I. Achiti, C. Confavreux, M. Coustans, E. le Page, et al.
Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score: Using disability and disease duration to rate disease severity
Neurology, April 12, 2005; 64(7): 1144 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J D Fisk, M G Brown, I S Sketris, L M Metz, T J Murray, and K J Stadnyk
A comparison of health utility measures for the evaluation of multiple sclerosis treatments
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2005; 76(1): 58 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
D A Gruenewald, I J Higginson, B Vivat, P Edmonds, and R E Burman
Quality of life measures for the palliative care of people severely affected by multiple sclerosis: a systematic review
Multiple Sclerosis, December 1, 2004; 10(6): 690 - 725.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. J. Cano, T. T. Warner, J. M. Linacre, K. P. Bhatia, A. J. Thompson, R. Fitzpatrick, and J. C. Hobart
Capturing the true burden of dystonia on patients: The Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58)
Neurology, November 9, 2004; 63(9): 1629 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
E L. Hoogervorst, J N. Zwemmer, B Jelles, C H Polman, and B M. Uitdehaag
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): relation to established measures of impairment and disability
Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2004; 10(5): 569 - 574.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
O.R. Pearson, M.E. Busse, R.W.M. van Deursen, and C.M. Wiles
Quantification of walking mobility in neurological disorders
QJM, August 1, 2004; 97(8): 463 - 475.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
C M Brady, R DasGupta, C Dalton, O J Wiseman, K J Berkley, and C J Fowler
An open-label pilot study of cannabis-based extracts for bladder dysfunction in advanced multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2004; 10(4): 425 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
C. McGuigan and M. Hutchinson
Confirming the validity and responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12)
Neurology, June 8, 2004; 62(11): 2103 - 2105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J Greenhalgh, H Ford, A F Long, and K Hurst
The MS Symptom and Impact Diary (MSSID): psychometric evaluation of a new instrument to measure the day to day impact of multiple sclerosis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2004; 75(4): 577 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
C McGuigan and M Hutchinson
The multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29) is a reliable and sensitive measure
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2004; 75(2): 266 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
J Hobart, N Kalkers, F Barkhof, B Uitdehaag, C Polman, and A Thompson
Outcome measures for multiple sclerosis clinical trials: relative measurement precision of the Expanded Disability Status Scale and Multiple Sclerosis Functional C omposite
Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2004; 10(1): 41 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
A Riazi, A J Thompson, and J C Hobart
Self-efficacy predicts self-reported health status in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2004; 10(1): 61 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
S. Thorne, A. Con, L. McGuinness, G. McPherson, and S. R. Harris
Health Care Communication Issues in Multiple Sclerosis: An Interpretive Description
Qual Health Res, January 1, 2004; 14(1): 5 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
S. M Gold, H. Schulz, A. Monch, K.-H. Schulz, and C. Heesen
Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis does not affect reliability and validity of self-report health measures
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2003; 9(4): 404 - 410.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
A Riazi, J C Hobart, D L Lamping, R Fitzpatrick, and A J Thompson
Evidence-based measurement in multiple sclerosis: the psychometric properties of the physical and psychological dimensions of three quality of life rating scales
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2003; 9(4): 411 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Riazi, J C Hobart, D L Lamping, R Fitzpatrick, J A Freeman, C Jenkinson, V Peto, and A J Thompson
Using the SF-36 measure to compare the health impact of multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease with normal population health profiles
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2003; 74(6): 710 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M W Nortvedt and T Riise
The use of quality of life measures in multiple sclerosis research
Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2003; 9(1): 63 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. C. Hobart, A. Riazi, D. L. Lamping, R. Fitzpatrick, and A. J. Thompson
Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: The 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12)
Neurology, January 14, 2003; 60(1): 31 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Riazi, J C Hobart, D L Lamping, R Fitzpatrick, and A J Thompson
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): reliability and validity in hospital based samples
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2002; 73(6): 701 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
A. J Thompson
Developing clinical outcome measures in multiple sclerosis: an evolving process
Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2002; 8(5): 357 - 358.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J Hobart, J Freeman, D Lamping, R Fitzpatrick, and A Thompson
The SF-36 in multiple sclerosis: why basic assumptions must be tested
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2001; 71(3): 363 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.