Brain, Vol. 124, No. 7, 1381-1395,
July 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Impaired temporal contrast sensitivity in dyslexics is specific to retain-and-compare paradigms
1 Department of Neurobiology and 2 Department of Psychology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
Correspondence to:
Dr Merav Ahissar, Department of Psychology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel E-mail: msmerava{at}pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il
Developmental dyslexia is a specific reading disability that affects 5–10% of the population. Recent studies have suggested that dyslexics may experience a deficit in the visual magnocellular pathway. The most extensively studied prediction deriving from this hypothesis is impaired contrast sensitivity to transient, low-luminance stimuli at low spatial frequencies. However, the findings are inconsistent across studies and even seemingly contradictory. In the present study, we administered several different paradigms for assessing temporal contrast sensitivity, and found both impaired and normal contrast sensitivity within the same group of dyslexic participants. Under sequential presentation, in a temporal forced choice paradigm, dyslexics showed impaired sensitivity to both drifting and flickering gratings. However, under simultaneous presentation, with a spatial forced choice paradigm, dyslexics' sensitivity did not differ from that of the controls. Within each paradigm, dyslexics' sensitivity was poorer at higher temporal frequencies, consistent with the magnocellular hypothesis. These results suggest that a basic perceptual impairment in dyslexics may be their limited ability to retain-and-compare perceptual traces across brief intervals.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H.-C. Huang and T.-Y. Wang Stimulus effects on cancellation task performance in children with and without dyslexia Behav Res Methods, May 1, 2009; 41(2): 539 - 545. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Ahissar, M. Nahum, I. Nelken, and S. Hochstein Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2009; 364(1515): 285 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Ram-Tsur, M. Faust, and A. Z. Zivotofsky Poor Performance on Serial Visual Tasks in Persons With Reading Disabilities: Impaired Working Memory? J Learn Disabil, September 1, 2008; 41(5): 437 - 450. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Banai and M. Ahissar Auditory Processing Deficits in Dyslexia: Task or Stimulus Related? Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1718 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Ram-Tsur, M. Faust, A. Caspi, C. R. Gordon, and A. Z. Zivotofsky Evidence for ocular motor deficits in developmental dyslexia: application of the double-step paradigm. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 4401 - 4409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. C. Mimran Temporal processing deficits in hebrew speaking children with reading disabilities. J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2006; 49(1): 127 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Amitay, G. Ben-Yehudah, K. Banai, and M. Ahissar Disabled readers suffer from visual and auditory impairments but not from a specific magnocellular deficit Brain, October 1, 2002; 125(10): 2272 - 2285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Ahissar, S. Nagarajan, M. Ahissar, A. Protopapas, H. Mahncke, and M. M. Merzenich Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex PNAS, November 6, 2001; 98(23): 13367 - 13372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|