Brain, Vol. 125, No. 10, 2272-2285,
October 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Disabled readers suffer from visual and auditory impairments but not from a specific magnocellular deficit
1 Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, Departments of 2 Neurobiology and 3 Psychology, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Correspondence to: Sygal Amitay, MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK E-mail: sygal{at}ihr.mrc.ac.uk
The magnocellular theory is a prominent, albeit controversial view asserting that many reading disabled (RD) individuals suffer from a specific impairment within the visual magnocellular pathway. In order to assess the validity of this theory we tested its two basic predictions. The first is that a subpopulation of RD subjects will show impaired performance across a broad range of psychophysical tasks relying on magnocellular functions. The second is that this subpopulation will not be consistently impaired across tasks that do not rely on magnocellular functions. We defined a behavioural criterion for magnocellular function, which incorporates performance in flicker detection, detection of drifting gratings (at low spatial frequencies), speed discrimination and detection of coherent dot motion. We found that some RD subjects (six out of 30) had impaired magnocellular function. Nevertheless, these RD subjects were also consistently impaired on a broad range of other perceptual tasks. The performance of the other subgroup of RD subjects on magnocellular tasks did not differ from that of controls. However, they did show impaired performance in both visual and auditory non-magnocellular tasks requiring fine frequency discriminations. The stimuli used in these tasks were neither modulated in time nor briefly presented. We conclude that some RD subjects have generally impaired perceptual skills. Many RD subjects have more specific perceptual deficits; however, the ‘magnocellular’ level of description did not capture the nature of the perceptual difficulties in any of the RD individuals assessed by us.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Ram-Tsur, M. Faust, and A. Z. Zivotofsky Poor Performance on Serial Visual Tasks in Persons With Reading Disabilities: Impaired Working Memory? J Learn Disabil, September 1, 2008; 41(5): 437 - 450. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Banai and M. Ahissar Auditory Processing Deficits in Dyslexia: Task or Stimulus Related? Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1718 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Ram-Tsur, M. Faust, A. Caspi, C. R. Gordon, and A. Z. Zivotofsky Evidence for ocular motor deficits in developmental dyslexia: application of the double-step paradigm. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 4401 - 4409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. C. Mimran Temporal processing deficits in hebrew speaking children with reading disabilities. J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2006; 49(1): 127 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Banai, T. Nicol, S. G. Zecker, and N. Kraus Brainstem Timing: Implications for Cortical Processing and Literacy J. Neurosci., October 26, 2005; 25(43): 9850 - 9857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. C. Skottun and J. R. Skoyles Letter to the Editor J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2005; 38(5): 386 - 386. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Chase and J. Stein Visual magnocellular deficits in dyslexia Brain, September 1, 2003; 126(9): E2 - E2. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Amitay, G. Ben-Yehudah, K. Banai, and M. Ahissar Reply to: Visual magnocellular deficits in dyslexia Brain, September 1, 2003; 126(9): E3 - E3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Ramus, S. Rosen, S. C. Dakin, B. L. Day, J. M. Castellote, S. White, and U. Frith Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults Brain, April 1, 2003; 126(4): 841 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|