Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on July 22, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
126/9/2081    most recent
awg210v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poliakoff, E.
Right arrow Articles by Spence, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poliakoff, E.
Right arrow Articles by Spence, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 126, No. 9, 2081-2092, September 2003
© 2003 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awg210

Orienting of attention and Parkinson’s disease: tactile inhibition of return and response inhibition

Ellen Poliakoff1, Donald J. O’Boyle2, A. Peter Moore3, Francis P. McGlone4, Frederick W. J. Cody1 and Charles Spence5

1 School of Biological Sciences, 2 Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, 3 Department of Neuroscience, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, 4 Cognitive Neuroscience Group, Unilever Research, The Wirral and 5 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Correspondence to: Ellen Poliakoff, Department of Psychology, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK E-mail: Ellen{at}Poliakoff.org.uk

There is growing evidence for cognitive impairments in Parkinson’s disease (PD), including in the orienting of attention and inhibition of return (IOR). IOR refers to the slowing of a response to a target stimulus presented in the same location as a previous stimulus. While some researchers have reported normal levels of visual IOR in PD patients using cue-target tasks, others have reported significant reductions in IOR in this patient group. However, the inhibitory effects observed in cue-target tasks may reflect non-ocular response inhibition associated with withholding a response from the cue stimulus, rather than attentional or oculomotor processes. Many researchers working with normal participants have circumvented this confound by using a target-target task, in which a response is made to all peripheral stimuli. Here, we compared IOR measured in cue-target and target-target tasks, using tactile rather than visual stimuli. Both the PD and the control groups exhibited significant inhibitory effects in the cue-target task, but only the control group exhibited significant IOR in the target-target task. Our results demonstrate a reduction, or elimination, of IOR in PD and this change may have been underestimated in previous studies, in which methodologically flawed cue-target tasks were used. This reduction in IOR may reflect impaired inhibitory processes or hyper-reflexive orienting in parkinsonian patients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
K Bronnick, U Ehrt, M Emre, P P De Deyn, K Wesnes, S Tekin, and D Aarsland
Attentional deficits affect activities of daily living in dementia-associated with Parkinson's disease
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2006; 77(10): 1136 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.