Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on February 19, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
127/4/783    most recent
awh086v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goel, V.
Right arrow Articles by Grafman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goel, V.
Right arrow Articles by Grafman, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 127, No. 4, 783-790, 2004
© 2004 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awh086

Asymmetrical involvement of frontal lobes in social reasoning

Vinod Goel3, Jeffrey Shuren1,2, Laura Sheesley1 and Jordan Grafman1

1 Cognitive Neuroscience Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA and 2 Office of Policy, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA, and 3 Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to: Dr Vinod Goel, Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3J 1P3 E-mail: vgoel{at}yorku.ca

The frontal lobes are widely implicated in logical reasoning. Recent neuroimaging studies suggest that frontal lobe involvement in reasoning is asymmetric (L>R) and increases with the presence of familiar, meaningful content in the reasoning situation. However, neuroimaging data can only provide sufficiency criteria. To determine the necessity of prefrontal involvement in logical reasoning, we tested 19 patients with focal frontal lobe lesions and 19 age- and education-matched normal controls on the Wason Card Selection Task, while manipulating social knowledge. Patients and controls performed equivalently on the arbitrary rule condition. Normal controls showed the expected improvement in the social knowledge conditions, but frontal lobe patients failed to show this facilitation in performance. Furthermore, left hemisphere patients were more affected than right hemisphere patients, suggesting that frontal lobe involvement in reasoning is asymmetric (L>R) and necessary for reasoning about social situations.

Key Words: reasoning; frontal lobes; Wason selection task; social knowledge

Abbreviations: IQ= intelligence quotient; WST = Wason selection task

Received June 24, 2003. Revised September 29, 2003. Accepted December 1, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
V. Goel, M. Tierney, L. Sheesley, A. Bartolo, O. Vartanian, and J. Grafman
Hemispheric Specialization in Human Prefrontal Cortex for Resolving Certain and Uncertain Inferences
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 2245 - 2250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. Tranel, H. Damasio, N. L. Denburg, and A. Bechara
Does gender play a role in functional asymmetry of ventromedial prefrontal cortex?
Brain, December 1, 2005; 128(12): 2872 - 2881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. Samson, I. A. Apperly, U. Kathirgamanathan, and G. W. Humphreys
Seeing it my way: a case of a selective deficit in inhibiting self-perspective
Brain, May 1, 2005; 128(5): 1102 - 1111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.