Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on February 25, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
127/4/860    most recent
awh099v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snowden, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Neary, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snowden, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Neary, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 127, No. 4, 860-872, 2004
© 2004 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awh099

Knowledge of famous faces and names in semantic dementia

J. S. Snowden, J. C. Thompson and D. Neary

Cerebral Function Unit, Greater Manchester Neuroscience Centre, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Julie S. Snowden, Cerebral Function Unit, Greater Manchester Neuroscience Centre, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD, UK E-mail: julie.snowden{at}man.ac.uk

Semantic dementia is a focal clinical syndrome, resulting from degeneration of the temporal lobes and characterized by progressive loss of conceptual knowledge about the world. Because of the highly circumscribed nature of the disorder it is a natural model for improving understanding of how semantic information is cerebrally represented. There is currently a lack of consensus. One view proposes the existence of modality specific meaning systems, in which visual and verbal information are stored separately. An opposing view assumes that information is represented by a unitary, amodal semantic system. The present study explores these alternatives in an examination of famous face and name knowledge in 15 patients with semantic dementia. The study of face recognition in patients with an established semantic disorder also permits an examination of the relationship between semantic dementia and the focal clinical syndrome of progressive prosopagnosia. The semantic dementia patients were profoundly impaired on both face and name identification and familiarity judgement tasks compared with amnesic patients with Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls. However, whereas the two reference groups performed better for names than faces, the semantic group showed the opposite pattern. This overall profile masked individual differences: semantic dementia patients with predominant left temporal lobe atrophy showed better recognition of names than faces, whereas patients with right temporal predominance showed the reverse pattern. Relative superiority for names or faces was mirrored by corresponding superiority for words or pictures on a standard semantic test. We interpret the findings as inconsistent with a unitary, amodal model of semantic memory. However, the data are not wholly compatible with a strict multiple system account. The data favour a model of semantic memory comprising a single interconnected network, with dedicated brain regions representing modality specific information. The data emphasize the importance of the anterior, inferolateral parts of the left temporal lobe for the representation of names and the corresponding parts of the right temporal lobe for faces. Dissociations between face and name knowledge provide a challenge for existing models of face processing. Moreover, they lead us to argue that the focal syndrome of progressive prosopagnosia is one of the clinical presentations of semantic dementia and not a separate clinical entity.

Key Words: semantic dementia; Alzheimer’s disease; face recognition; name recognition; prosopagnosia

Abbreviations: FRUs = face recognition units; MMSE = Mini Mental State Examination; PINs = person identity nodes; VOSP = Visual Object and Space Perception Battery

Received September 4, 2003. Revised December 12, 2003. Accepted December 14, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
M. A. Lambon Ralph, G. Pobric, and E. Jefferies
Conceptual Knowledge Is Underpinned by the Temporal Pole Bilaterally: Convergent Evidence from rTMS
Cereb Cortex, August 4, 2008; (2008) bhn131v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A D Hutchinson and J L Mathias
Neuropsychological deficits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analytic review
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2007; 78(9): 917 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
I. R. Olson, A. Plotzker, and Y. Ezzyat
The Enigmatic temporal pole: a review of findings on social and emotional processing
Brain, July 1, 2007; 130(7): 1718 - 1731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
U. Noppeney, K. Patterson, L. K. Tyler, H. Moss, E. A. Stamatakis, P. Bright, C. Mummery, and C. J. Price
Temporal lobe lesions and semantic impairment: a comparison of herpes simplex virus encephalitis and semantic dementia
Brain, April 1, 2007; 130(4): 1138 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
W. W. Seeley, A. M. Bauer, B. L. Miller, M. L. Gorno-Tempini, J. H. Kramer, M. Weiner, and H. J. Rosen
The natural history of temporal variant frontotemporal dementia
Neurology, April 26, 2005; 64(8): 1384 - 1390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
S. Joubert, O. Felician, E. Barbeau, A. Sontheimer, E. Guedj, M. Ceccaldi, and M. Poncet
Progressive prosopagnosia: Clinical and neuroimaging results
Neurology, November 23, 2004; 63(10): 1962 - 1965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.