Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on March 19, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
127/5/965    most recent
awh131v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Momjian, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pickard, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Momjian, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pickard, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 127, No. 5, 965-972, 2004
© 2004 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awh131

Pattern of white matter regional cerebral blood flow and autoregulation in normal pressure hydrocephalus

Shahan Momjian, Brian K. Owler, Zofia Czosnyka, Marek Czosnyka, Alonso Pena and John D. Pickard

Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Correspondence to: Shahan Momjian, Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Box 167, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UKE-mail: sm471@medschl.cam.ac.uk

The mean cerebral blood flow (CBF) has generally been demonstrated to be lower in normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) than in normal controls. We investigated the distribution of the regional peri- and paraventricular white matter CBF (WM CBF) in NPH at baseline and during a controlled rise in intracranial pressure (ICP). Twelve patients with idiopathic NPH (mean age 69 years) underwent a CSF infusion study. CBF was measured by H215O PET at baseline and then during the steady-state plateau of raised ICP. The PET images were co-registered and resliced to 3D structural T1-weighted MRIs. Ten healthy normal volunteers served as control subjects for baseline CBF determination only. Profiles of the regional distribution of the baseline WM CBF and of the percentage change in WM CBF as a function of distance from the ventricles were plotted. The global mean baseline CBF in patients (28.4 ± 5.2 ml/100 ml/min) was lower than in the control subjects (33 ± 5.4 ml/100 ml/min) (P < 0.005). In patients, the profile of the regional WM CBF at baseline showed an increase with distance from the ventricles (P < 0.0001), with a maximal reduction adjacent to the ventricles and progressive normalization with distance, whereas in controls no relationship was apparent (P = 0.0748). In 10 patients, the rise in ICP during the infusion produced a fall in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and a significant decrease of the global mean CBF from 27.6 ± 3.1 to 24.5 ± 2.9 ml/100 ml/min (P < 0.0001). The profile of the percentage changes in regional WM CBF in patients showed a U-shaped relationship with distance from the ventricles (P = 0.0007), with a maximal decrease skewed on the side of the lateral ventricles at around a mean distance of 9 mm. The WM CBF is reduced in NPH, with an abnormal gradient from the lateral ventricles towards the subcortical WM. An excessive decrease in CBF is brought about by reductions in CPP and appears to be maximal in the paraventricular watershed region. These results are discussed in the light of previous hypotheses concerning the aetiology of periventricular CBF reduction in NPH.

Key Words: normal pressure hydrocephalus; cerebral blood flow; autoregulation; white matter

Abbreviations: ABP = arterial blood pressure; CBF = cerebral blood flow; CPP = cerebral perfusion pressure; ICP = intracranial pressure; MCA = middle cerebral artery; NPH = normal pressure hydrocephalus; rCBF = regional CBF; SRAR = static rate of autoregulation; WM = white matter

Received September 4, 2003. Revised December 18, 2003. Accepted December 22, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch NeurolHome page
J. C. Masdeu, B. Pascual, F. Bressi, M. Casale, E. Prieto, J. Arbizu, and M. A. Fernandez-Seara
Ventricular Wall Granulations and Draining of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Chronic Giant Hydrocephalus
Arch Neurol, February 1, 2009; 66(2): 262 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
N. Lenfeldt, A. Larsson, L. Nyberg, M. Andersson, R. Birgander, A. Eklund, and J. Malm
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: increased supplementary motor activity accounts for improvement after CSF drainage
Brain, November 1, 2008; 131(11): 2904 - 2912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
G.A. Bateman
The Pathophysiology of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Cerebral Ischemia or Altered Venous Hemodynamics?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 198 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PNHome page
J. Malm and A. Eklund
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
Practical Neurology, February 1, 2006; 6(1): 14 - 27.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
G. D. Silverberg
Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH): ischaemia, CSF stagnation or both
Brain, May 1, 2004; 127(5): 947 - 948.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.