Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on June 4, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
127/7/1463    most recent
awh176v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bielekova, B.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bielekova, B.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 127, No. 7, 1463-1478, July 2004
© 2004 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awh176

Development of biomarkers in multiple sclerosis

Bibiana Bielekova and Roland Martin

Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Correspondence to: Dr Bibiana Bielekova, Neuroimmunology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10, Room 5B-16, 10 Center DR MSC 1400, Bethesda, MD 20892-1400, USA. E-mail: bielekob{at}ninds.nih.gov

Multiple sclerosis is a complex disease, as several pathophysiological processes (including inflammation, demyelination, axonal damage and repair mechanisms) participate in the disease process. Furthermore, as new pathological evidence reveals, these processes are not uniformly represented across patient populations but can selectively predominate in individual patients, thus contributing to the heterogeneity in phenotypic expression of the disease, its prognosis and response to therapies. While the armamentarium of available therapies for multiple sclerosis broadens, little is known about factors that predict treatment response in individual patients to a specific drug. More importantly, we are beginning to understand that, analogous to cancer therapy, the successful therapeutic strategy in multiple sclerosis might ultimately involve the combination of different therapeutics targeting several dominant pathophysiological processes. The development of these process-specific therapies will be impossible without the use of biomarkers that reflect the targeted process, can select patient population in which the targeted process is prevailing and can aid during the more rapid screening of therapeutic agents in the early phase of their development. This review summarizes the general concepts of biomarkers and their potential use as surrogate endpoints and tailors these concepts to specific applications in multiple sclerosis research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
T Mondria, C H J Lamers, P A W t. Boekhorst, J W Gratama, and R Q Hintzen
Bone-marrow transplantation fails to halt intrathecal lymphocyte activation in multiple sclerosis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2008; 79(9): 1013 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
J Toledo, J Sepulcre, A Salinas-Alaman, A Garcia-Layana, M Murie-Fernandez, B Bejarano, and P Villoslada
Retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy is associated with physical and cognitive disability in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2008; 14(7): 906 - 912.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
L Durelli, P Barbero, M Bergui, E Versino, M A Bassano, E Verdun, C Rivoiro, C Ferrero, E Picco, P Ripellino, et al.
MRI activity and neutralising antibody as predictors of response to interferon {beta} treatment in multiple sclerosis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2008; 79(6): 646 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. D. Sadovnick and D. H. Jacobs
MS and cognition and APOE: The ongoing conundrum about biomarkers
Neurology, January 15, 2008; 70(3): 164 - 165.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. F. Wu, E. D. Schwartz, T. Lei, A. Souza, S. Mishra, D. A. Jacobs, C. E. Markowitz, S. L. Galetta, M. L. Nano-Schiavi, L. M. Desiderio, et al.
Relation of vision to global and regional brain MRI in multiple sclerosis
Neurology, December 4, 2007; 69(23): 2128 - 2135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
V. Lehmensiek, S. Sussmuth, G. Tauscher, J. Brettschneider, S. Felk, F. Gillardon, and H. Tumani
Cerebrospinal fluid proteome profile in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2007; 13(7): 840 - 849.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M. Ukkonen, X. Wu, B. Reipert, P. Dastidar, and I. Elovaara
Cell surface adhesion molecules and cytokine profiles in primary progressive multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, July 1, 2007; 13(6): 701 - 707.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. Sepulcre, M. Murie-Fernandez, A. Salinas-Alaman, A. Garcia-Layana, B. Bejarano, and P. Villoslada
Diagnostic accuracy of retinal abnormalities in predicting disease activity in MS
Neurology, May 1, 2007; 68(18): 1488 - 1494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Aranami, S. Miyake, and T. Yamamura
Differential Expression of CD11c by Peripheral Blood NK Cells Reflects Temporal Activity of Multiple Sclerosis
J. Immunol., October 15, 2006; 177(8): 5659 - 5667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PNHome page
R. Gold and R. Hohlfeld
Multiple sclerosis therapy: new agents carry new risks
Practical Neurology, August 1, 2006; 6(4): 248 - 251.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
E Fainardi, M Castellazzi, T Bellini, M C Manfrinato, E Baldi, I Casetta, E Paolino, E Granieri, and F Dallocchio
Cerebrospinal fluid and serum levels and intrathecal production of active matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as markers of disease activity in patients with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2006; 12(3): 294 - 301.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
E Fainardi, R Rizzo, L Melchiorri, M Castellazzi, E Paolino, M R Tola, E Granieri, and O R Baricordi
Intrathecal synthesis of soluble HLA-G and HLA-I molecules are reciprocally associated to clinical and MRI activity in patients with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2006; 12(1): 2 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
F Sellebjerg, C Ross, N Koch-Henriksen, P S. Sorensen, J L Frederiksen, K Bendtzen, and T L Sorensen
CD26+CD4+T cell counts and attack risk in interferon-treated multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, December 1, 2005; 11(6): 641 - 645.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
B. Bielekova, N. Kadom, E. Fisher, N. Jeffries, J. Ohayon, N. Richert, T. Howard, C. N. Bash, J. A. Frank, L. Stone, et al.
MRI as a marker for disease heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis
Neurology, October 11, 2005; 65(7): 1071 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. Sastre-Garriga, G. T. Ingle, M. Rovaris, N. Tellez, B. Jasperse, D. R. Altmann, B. Benedetti, V. L. Stevenson, M. Cercignani, S. M. Leary, et al.
Long-term clinical outcome of primary progressive MS: Predictive value of clinical and MRI data
Neurology, August 23, 2005; 65(4): 633 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. Lolli, B. Mulinacci, A. Carotenuto, B. Bonetti, G. Sabatino, B. Mazzanti, A. M. D'Ursi, E. Novellino, M. Pazzagli, L. Lovato, et al.
An N-glucosylated peptide detecting disease-specific autoantibodies, biomarkers of multiple sclerosis
PNAS, July 19, 2005; 102(29): 10273 - 10278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.