Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on July 13, 2005
Brain 2005 128(11):2722-2731; doi:10.1093/brain/awh588
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
128/11/2722    most recent
awh588v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weisz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Elbert, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weisz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Elbert, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Neuromagnetic indicators of auditory cortical reorganization of tinnitus

Nathan Weisz, Christian Wienbruch, Katalin Dohrmann and Thomas Elbert

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany

Correspondence to: Nathan Weisz, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, PO Box D25, 78457 Konstanz, Germany E-mail: Nathan.Weisz{at}uni-konstanz.de

Animal studies show that following damage to inner-ear receptors, central representations of intact lesion-edge (LE) frequencies become enlarged (map reorganization). One theory of tinnitus holds that this process could be related to the tinnitus sensation. To test this hypothesis, neuromagnetic evoked fields of tinnitus participants with high-frequency hearing loss and normal hearing controls were measured, while subjects listened to monaurally presented LE or control (CO; an octave below LE) tones. The predictions made based on the map reorganization hypothesis of tinnitus were that neuronal responses to LE frequencies would be enhanced, and that source localizations for LE would be distorted. N1m equivalent dipole moments for LE were not supranormal in the tinnitus group, whereas responses to CO of tinnitus patients compared to controls were enlarged in the right hemisphere. This effect was positively associated with tinnitus-related distress. Abnormal source locations were found for generators activated by LE tones in the right hemisphere of the tinnitus group. This right-hemispheric map distortion was not associated with subjective variables of tinnitus. A positive correlation with tinnitus distress was found for the left hemisphere with more anterior sources being associated with enhanced distress. However, this result was independent of the frequency of the stimulus. Overall, the present study suggests that mechanisms of map reorganization, although present in the data, cannot satisfactorily explain the emergence of tinnitus and that differential hemispheric involvement must be considered.

Key Words: magnetencephalography; phantom perceptions; distress; cortical reorganization; tinnitus

Abbreviations: CO = control; LE = lesion-edge

Received January 9, 2005. Revised March 29, 2005. Accepted June 14, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
K. J. Munro
Reorganization of the Adult Auditory System: Perceptual and Physiological Evidence From Monaural Fitting of Hearing Aids
Trends in Amplification, September 1, 2008; 12(3): 254 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
K. J. Munro
Reorganization of the Adult Auditory System: Perceptual and Physiological Evidence From Monaural Fitting of Hearing Aids
Trends in Amplification, June 1, 2008; 12(2): 85 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.