Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on August 3, 2006
Brain 2006 129(10):2660-2666; doi:10.1093/brain/awl190
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/10/2660    most recent
awl190v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elble, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tintner, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elble, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tintner, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Tremor amplitude is logarithmically related to 4- and 5-point tremor rating scales

Rodger J. Elble1, Seth L. Pullman2, Joseph Y. Matsumoto3, Jan Raethjen5, Günther Deuschl5 and Ron Tintner, the Tremor Research Group4

1 Department of Neurology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine Springfield, IL, USA 2 Department of Neurology, The Neurological Institute Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA 3 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA 4 Neurological Institute, The Methodist Hospital Houston, TX, USA 5 Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany

Correspondence to: Dr J. R. Elble, Department of Neurology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, PO Box 19643, Springfield, IL 62795-9643, USA E-mail: relble{at}siumed.edu

Tremor rating scales (TRSs) are used commonly in the clinical assessment of tremor, but the relationship of a TRS to actual tremor amplitude has never been quantified. Consequently, the resolution of these scales is unknown, and the clinical significance of a 1-point change in TRS is uncertain. We therefore sought to determine the change in tremor amplitude that corresponds to a 1-point change in a typical 5-point TRS. Data from five laboratories were analysed, and 928 patients with various types of hand tremor were studied. Hand tremor was quantified with a graphics tablet in three different labs, an accelerometer in three labs and a mechanical-linkage device in one lab. Tremor in writing, drawing, horizontal posture, rest and finger–nose testing was graded using a variety of TRSs. The relationship between TRS scores and tremor amplitude was computed for each task and laboratory. A logarithmic relationship between a 5-point (0–4) TRS and tremor amplitude (T, measured in centimetres) was found in all five labs, despite widely varying rating scales and transducer methodology. Thus, T2/T1 = 10{alpha}(TRS2–TRS1). The value of {alpha} ranged from 0.414 to 0.441 for writing, 0.355–0.574 for spiral drawing, 0.441 to 0.488 for rest tremor, 0.266–0.577 for postural tremor and 0.306 for finger–nose testing. For {alpha} = 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6 and 0.7, the ratios T2/T1 for a 1-point decrease in TRS are 0.501, 0.398, 0.316, 0.251 and 0.200. Therefore, a 1-point change in TRS represents a substantial change in tremor amplitude. Knowledge of the relationship between TRS and precise measures of tremor is useful in interpreting the clinical significance of changes in TRS produced by disease or therapy.

Key Words: tremor; rating scale; psychophysics; accelerometry; measurement

Abbreviations: ET, essential tremor; TRG, Tremor Research Group; TRS, tremor rating scale

Received April 29, 2006. Revised June 14, 2006. Accepted June 18, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.