Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on January 9, 2006
Brain 2006 129(3):584-594; doi:10.1093/brain/awh721
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/3/584    most recent
awh721v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kremenchutzky, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ebers, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kremenchutzky, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ebers, G. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 9: Observations on the progressive phase of the disease

M. Kremenchutzky1, G. P. A. Rice1, J. Baskerville1, D. M. Wingerchuk2 and G. C. Ebers3

1 Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada, 2 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA and 3 Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Correspondence and reprint requests to: Professor G. C. Ebers, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK E-mail: george.ebers{at}clneuro.ox.ac.uk

The clinical features of relapses and progression largely define multiple sclerosis phenotypes. A relapsing course is followed by chronic progression in some 80% of cases within 2 decades. The relationship between these phases and long-term outcome remains uncertain. We have analysed these clinical features within a well-studied natural history cohort with mean follow-up of 25 years. For the entire cohort, median times to reach Disability Status Scale (DSS) 6, 8 and 10 were 12.7, 20.6 and 43.9 years, respectively. Among 824 attack-onset patients, the great majority entered a progressive phase with a mean time to progression of 10.4 years. The effects of relapses often cloud the clinical onset of progression. However, there are circumstances where onset of progression is early, relatively discrete and identifiable at DSS of 2 or less. Three subgroups allow for clarity of outcome comparison and they are (i) cases of primary progressive (PP) disease, (ii) attack-onset disease where only a single attack has occurred before onset of progression (SAP) and (iii) secondary progressive (SP) disease where recovery from relapses allows recognition of the earliest clinical stages when progression begins. Here we compare survival curves in these three groups. Among cohorts of SAP (n = 140), PP (n = 219) and SP (n = 146) where progression was stratified by DSS at its onset, there was no difference in time to DSS 6, 8 and 10. These findings demonstrate that the progressive course is independent of relapses either preceding the onset of relapse-free progression or subsequent to it. Among SAP patients, the degree of recovery from the single defining exacerbation had no significant effect on outcome. The site of the original attack was not usually where progression began. The relatively stereotyped nature of the progressive phase seen in all progressive phenotypes suggests regional and/or functional differential susceptibility to a process that appears degenerative in nature. The highly prevalent distal corticospinal tract dysfunction in progressive disease and the pathologically demonstrated selective axonal loss seen in this tract raises the possibility of a dying back central axonopathy, at least in part independent of plaque location or burden. Despite considerable individual variation, the progressive course of disability seen in groups of PP, SAP and SP-DSS2 is similarly stereotyped in quality and pace and may entail mechanisms common to all forms of progressive multiple sclerosis. The possibility that this is the primary process in some cases must be considered.

Key Words: multiple sclerosis; natural history; progressive clinical course

Abbreviations: DSS = Disability Status Scale; PP = primary progressive; RR = relapsing–remitting; SP = secondary progressive; SAP = single-attack progressive

Received October 19, 2005. Revised November 15, 2005. Accepted November 15, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
A Wilkins and N Scolding
Protecting axons in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2008; 14(8): 1013 - 1025.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M Koch, M Uyttenboogaart, A van Harten, M Heerings, and J De Keyser
Fatigue, depression and progression in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, July 1, 2008; 14(6): 815 - 822.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M Koch, M Uyttenboogaart, A van Harten, and J De Keyser
Factors associated with the risk of secondary progression in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, July 1, 2008; 14(6): 799 - 803.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M Koch, J De Keyser, and H Tremlett
Timing of birth and disease progression in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, July 1, 2008; 14(6): 793 - 798.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. Sawcer
The complex genetics of multiple sclerosis: pitfalls and prospects
Brain, May 18, 2008; (2008) awn081v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M. Leone, S. Bonissoni, L. Collimedaglia, F. Tesser, S. Calzoni, A. Stecco, P. Naldi, and F. Monaco
Factors predicting incomplete recovery from relapses in multiple sclerosis: a prospective study
Multiple Sclerosis, May 1, 2008; 14(4): 485 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
H. Tremlett, Yinshan Zhao, and V. Devonshire
Natural history of secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2008; 14(3): 314 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M. Koch, M. Uyttenboogaart, M. Heerings, D. Heersema, J. Mostert, and J. De Keyser
Progression in familial and nonfamilial MS
Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2008; 14(3): 300 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. K. Fisniku, P. A. Brex, D. R. Altmann, K. A. Miszkiel, C. E. Benton, R. Lanyon, A. J. Thompson, and D. H. Miller
Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis
Brain, March 1, 2008; 131(3): 808 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Koch, A. van Harten, M. Uyttenboogaart, and J. De Keyser
Cigarette smoking and progression in multiple sclerosis
Neurology, October 9, 2007; 69(15): 1515 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. M. Wingerchuk, S. J. Pittock, C. F. Lucchinetti, V. A. Lennon, and B. G. Weinshenker
A secondary progressive clinical course is uncommon in neuromyelitis optica
Neurology, February 20, 2007; 68(8): 603 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
The Natural History of Multiple Sclerosis
Journal Watch Neurology, June 22, 2006; 2006(622): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]


Home page
BrainHome page
G. C. DeLuca, K. Williams, N. Evangelou, G. C. Ebers, and M. M. Esiri
The contribution of demyelination to axonal loss in multiple sclerosis
Brain, June 1, 2006; 129(6): 1507 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.