Brain Advance Access originally published online on February 15, 2006
Brain 2006 129(4):932-943; doi:10.1093/brain/awl032
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Neural basis of irony comprehension in children with autism: the role of prosody and context
Departments of 1 Psychology, 2 Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, 3 Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA and 4 Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Correspondence to: Mirella Dapretto, PhD, UCLA Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, Room 101, 660 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7085, USA E-mail: mirella{at}loni.ucla.edu
While individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are typically impaired in interpreting the communicative intent of others, little is known about the neural bases of higher-level pragmatic impairments. Here, we used functional MRI (fMRI) to examine the neural circuitry underlying deficits in understanding irony in high-functioning children with ASD. Participants listened to short scenarios and decided whether the speaker was sincere or ironic. Three types of scenarios were used in which we varied the information available to guide this decision. Scenarios included (i) both knowledge of the event outcome and strong prosodic cues (sincere or sarcastic intonation), (ii) prosodic cues only or (iii) knowledge of the event outcome only. Although children with ASD performed well above chance, they were less accurate than typically developing (TD) children at interpreting the communicative intent behind a potentially ironic remark, particularly with regard to taking advantage of available contextual information. In contrast to prior research showing hypoactivation of regions involved in understanding the mental states of others, children with ASD showed significantly greater activity than TD children in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) as well as in bilateral temporal regions. Increased activity in the ASD group fell within the network recruited in the TD group and may reflect more effortful processing needed to interpret the intended meaning of an utterance. These results confirm that children with ASD have difficulty interpreting the communicative intent of others and suggest that these individuals can recruit regions activated as part of the normative neural circuitry when task demands require explicit attention to socially relevant cues.
Key Words: autism; brain development; fMRI; language pragmatics; social cognition
Abbreviations: ASD = autism spectrum disorders; BA = Brodmann area; EKO = event knowledge only; IFG = inferior frontal gyrus; MPFC = medial prefrontal cortex; PCO = prosodic cues only; STG = superior temporal gyrus; STS = superior temporal sulcus; TD = typically developing
Received September 20, 2005. Revised January 9, 2006. Accepted January 14, 2006.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. M. J. Y. Tesink, J. K. Buitelaar, K. M. Petersson, R. J. van der Gaag, C. C. Kan, I. Tendolkar, and P. Hagoort Neural correlates of pragmatic language comprehension in autism spectrum disorders Brain, July 1, 2009; 132(7): 1941 - 1952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. E. Frye and M. S. Beauchamp Receptive Language Organization in High-Functioning Autism J Child Neurol, February 1, 2009; 24(2): 231 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. T. Wang, S. S. Lee, M. Sigman, and M. Dapretto Reading Affect in the Face and Voice: Neural Correlates of Interpreting Communicative Intent in Children and Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorders Arch Gen Psychiatry, June 1, 2007; 64(6): 698 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Minerva BMJ, April 22, 2006; 332(7547): 982 - 982. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|