Brain Advance Access originally published online on April 3, 2006
Brain 2006 129(5):1152-1163; doi:10.1093/brain/awl069
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lost in semantic space: a multi-modal, non-verbal assessment of feature knowledge in semantic dementia
1 University College London, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 Royal Free Hospital, Hampstead, London, UK
Correspondence to: Dr Peter Garrard, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Alexandra House, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK E-mail: p.garrard{at}ucl.ac.uk
A novel, non-verbal test of semantic feature knowledge is introduced, enabling subordinate knowledge of four important concept attributescolour, sound, environmental context and motionto be individually probed. This methodology provides more specific information than existing non-verbal semantic tests about the status of attribute knowledge relating to individual concept representations. Performance on this test of a group of 12 patients with semantic dementia (10 male, mean age: 64.4 years) correlated strongly with their scores on more conventional tests of semantic memory, such as naming and word-to-picture matching. The test's overlapping structure, in which individual concepts were probed in two, three or all four modalities, provided evidence of performance consistency on individual items between feature conditions. Group and individual analyses revealed little evidence for differential performance across the four feature conditions, though sound and colour correlated most strongly, and motion least strongly, with other semantic tasks, and patients were less accurate on the motion features of living than non-living concepts (with no such conceptual domain differences in the other conditions). The results are discussed in the context of their implications for the place of semantic dementia within the classification of progressive aphasic syndromes, and for contemporary models of semantic representation and organization.
Key Words: connectionist modelling; motion; semantic dementia; semantic features; semantic memory
Abbreviations: FRT = Feature Reality Test; CCP = Camel and Cactus Test
Original Submission July 19, 2005. Revised December 16, 2005. Accepted March 1, 2006..
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Goll, S. J. Crutch, J. H. Y. Loo, J. D. Rohrer, C. Frost, D.-E. Bamiou, and J. D. Warren Non-verbal sound processing in the primary progressive aphasias Brain, October 1, 2009; (2009) awp235v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zahn, J. Moll, V. Iyengar, E. D. Huey, M. Tierney, F. Krueger, and J. Grafman Social conceptual impairments in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with right anterior temporal hypometabolism Brain, March 1, 2009; 132(3): 604 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zahn, J. Moll, F. Krueger, E. D. Huey, G. Garrido, and J. Grafman Social concepts are represented in the superior anterior temporal cortex PNAS, April 10, 2007; 104(15): 6430 - 6435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
What Explains the Loss of Object Knowledge in Semantic Dementia? Journal Watch Neurology, August 8, 2006; 2006(808): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||


