Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on May 23, 2006
Brain 2006 129(7):1732-1747; doi:10.1093/brain/awl127
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/7/1732    most recent
awl127v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plaha, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plaha, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, S. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Stimulation of the caudal zona incerta is superior to stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in improving contralateral parkinsonism

Puneet Plaha1, Y. Ben-Shlomo2, Nikunj K. Patel1 and Steven S. Gill1

1 Institute of Neurosciences, Department of Neurosurgery, Frenchay Hospital Bristol, UK 2 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol Bristol, UK

Correspondence to: Steven S. Gill, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol BS16 1LE, UK E-mail: steven.gill{at}north-bristol.swest.nhs.uk

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has an increasing role in the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Although, the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is the commonly chosen target, a number of groups have reported that the most effective contact lies dorsal/dorsomedial to the STN (region of the pallidofugal fibres and the rostral zona incerta) or at the junction between the dorsal border of the STN and the latter. We analysed our outcome data from Parkinson's disease patients treated with DBS between April 2002 and June 2004. During this period we moved our target from the STN to the region dorsomedial/medial to it and subsequently targeted the caudal part of the zona incerta nucleus (cZI). We present a comparison of the motor outcomes between these three groups of patients with optimal contacts within the STN (group 1), dorsomedial/medial to the STN (group 2) and in the cZI nucleus (group 3). Thirty-five patients with Parkinson's disease underwent MRI directed implantation of 64 DBS leads into the STN (17), dorsomedial/medial to STN (20) and cZI (27). The primary outcome measure was the contralateral Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score (off medication/off stimulation versus off medication/on stimulation) measured at follow-up (median time 6 months). The secondary outcome measures were the UPDRS III subscores of tremor, bradykinesia and rigidity. Dyskinesia score, L-dopa medication reduction and stimulation parameters were also recorded. The mean adjusted contralateral UPDRS III score with cZI stimulation was 3.1 (76% reduction) compared to 4.9 (61% reduction) in group 2 and 5.7 (55% reduction) in the STN (P-value for trend <0.001). There was a 93% improvement in tremor with cZI stimulation versus 86% in group 2 versus 61% in group 1 (P-value = 0.01). Adjusted ‘off–on’ rigidity scores were 1.0 for the cZI group (76% reduction), 2.0 for group 2 (52% reduction) and 2.1 for group 1 (50% reduction) (P-value for trend = 0.002). Bradykinesia was more markedly improved in the cZI group (65%) compared to group 2 (56%) or STN group (59%) (P-value for trend = 0.17). There were no statistically significant differences in the dyskinesia scores, L-dopa medication reduction and stimulation parameters between the three groups. Stimulation related complications were seen in some group 2 patients. High frequency stimulation of the cZI results in greater improvement in contralateral motor scores in Parkinson's disease patients than stimulation of the STN. We discuss the implications of this finding and the potential role played by the ZI in Parkinson's disease.

Key Words: caudal zona incerta stimulation; Parkinson's disease

Abbreviations: cZI, caudal part of the zona incerta nucleus; DBS, deep brain stimulation; rZI, rostral ZI; STN, subthalamic nucleus; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale

Received March 11, 2005. Revised March 24, 2006. Accepted April 12, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
C B Maks, C R Butson, B L Walter, J L Vitek, and C C McIntyre
Deep brain stimulation activation volumes and their association with neurophysiological mapping and therapeutic outcomes
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2009; 80(6): 659 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
C. W. Olanow, M. B. Stern, and K. Sethi
The scientific and clinical basis for the treatment of Parkinson disease (2009)
Neurology, May 26, 2009; 72(21_Supplement_4): S1 - S136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Fuentes, P. Petersson, W. B. Siesser, M. G. Caron, and M. A. L. Nicolelis
Spinal Cord Stimulation Restores Locomotion in Animal Models of Parkinson's Disease
Science, March 20, 2009; 323(5921): 1578 - 1582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P Plaha, S Khan, and S S Gill
Bilateral stimulation of the caudal zona incerta nucleus for tremor control
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 79(5): 504 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P Plaha, S Filipovic, and S S Gill
Induction of parkinsonian resting tremor by stimulation of the caudal zona incerta nucleus: a clinical study
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 79(5): 514 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. Guehl, A. Vital, E. Cuny, U. Spampinato, A. Rougier, B. Bioulac, and P. Burbaud
POSTMORTEM PROOF OF EFFECTIVENESS OF ZONA INCERTA STIMULATION IN PARKINSON DISEASE
Neurology, April 15, 2008; 70(16_Part_2): 1489 - 1490.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
H. L. Low, F. T. Sayer, and C. R. Honey
Pathological Crying Caused by High-Frequency Stimulation in the Region of the Caudal Internal Capsule
Arch Neurol, February 1, 2008; 65(2): 264 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Li, G. W. Arbuthnott, M. J. Jutras, J. A. Goldberg, and D. Jaeger
Resonant Antidromic Cortical Circuit Activation as a Consequence of High-Frequency Subthalamic Deep-Brain Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3525 - 3537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Stefani, A. M. Lozano, A. Peppe, P. Stanzione, S. Galati, D. Tropepi, M. Pierantozzi, L. Brusa, E. Scarnati, and P. Mazzone
Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine and subthalamic nuclei in severe Parkinson's disease
Brain, June 1, 2007; 130(6): 1596 - 1607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Bartho, A. Slezia, V. Varga, H. Bokor, D. Pinault, G. Buzsaki, and L. Acsady
Cortical Control of Zona Incerta
J. Neurosci., February 14, 2007; 27(7): 1670 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.