Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on May 26, 2006
Brain 2006 129(7):1803-1821; doi:10.1093/brain/awl140
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/7/1803    most recent
awl140v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rushmore, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Payne, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rushmore, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Payne, B. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Functional circuitry underlying visual neglect

R. Jarrett Rushmore1, Antoni Valero-Cabre1, Stephen G. Lomber2, Claus C. Hilgetag3 and Bertram R. Payne1,{dagger}

1 Laboratory of Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine Boston, MA 2 Centre for Brain and Mind, Departments of Physiology and Psychology, University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada 3 School of Engineering and Science, International University Bremen Bremen, Germany

Correspondence to: R. Jarrett Rushmore, PhD, Laboratory of Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 700 Albany Street, W702, Boston, MA 02118, USA E-mail: rushmore{at}bu.edu

Visuospatial neglect is a common neurological syndrome caused by unilateral brain damage to the posterior and inferior parietal cerebral cortex, and is characterized by an inability to respond or orient to stimuli presented in the contralesional hemifield. Neglect has been elicited in experimental models of the rat, cat and monkey, and is thought to result in part from a pathological state of inhibition exerted on the damaged hemisphere by the hyperexcited intact hemisphere. We sought to test this theory by assessing neural activity levels in multiple brain structures during neglect using 2-deoxyglucose (2DG) as a metabolic marker of neural activity. Neglect was induced in two ways: (i) by cooling deactivation of posterior parietal cortex or (ii) in conjunction with broader cortical blindness produced by unilateral lesion of all contiguous visual cortical areas spanning occipital, parietal and temporal regions. The direction and magnitude of changes in 2DG uptake were measured in cerebral cortex and midbrain structures. Finally, the 2DG uptake was assessed in a group of cats in which the lesion-induced neglect component of blindness was cancelled by cooling of either the contralateral posterior parietal cortex or the contralateral superior colliculus (SC). Overall, we found that (i) both lesion- and cooling-induced neglect are associated with decreases in 2DG uptake in specific ipsilateral cortical and midbrain regions; (ii) levels of 2DG uptake in the intermediate and deep layers of the SC contralateral to both cooling and lesion deactivations are increased; (iii) changes in 2DG uptake were not identified in the contralateral cortex; and (iv) reversal of the lesion-induced neglect component of blindness is associated with a reduction of contralesional 2DG uptake to normal or subnormal levels. These data are in accord with theories of neglect that include mutually suppressive mechanisms between the two hemispheres, and we show that these mechanisms operate at the level of the SC, but are not apparent at the level of cortex. These results suggest that the most effective therapies for visual neglect will be those that act to decrease neural activity in the intermediate layers of the SC contralateral to the brain damage.

Key Words: visuospatial neglect; superior colliculus; animal models; parietal cortex; visual perception

Abbreviations: 2DG, 2-deoxyglucose; MSs, middle suprasylvian sulcus; pMS, posterior middle suprasylvian; SC, superior colliculus; SGI, stratum griseum intermediale; SGP, stratum griseum profundum; SGS, stratum griseum superficiale; SO, stratum opticum

.

Received March 7, 2006. Revised April 24, 2006. Accepted April 26, 2006.


{dagger}The death of Dr Bertram Payne occurred during the preparation of this manuscript.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
R. Ptak, A. Schnider, L. Golay, and R. Muri
A non-spatial bias favouring fixated stimuli revealed in patients with spatial neglect
Brain, December 1, 2007; 130(12): 3211 - 3222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P. Bartolomeo, M. Thiebaut de Schotten, and F. Doricchi
Left Unilateral Neglect as a Disconnection Syndrome
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2479 - 2490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.