Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on June 24, 2006
Brain 2006 129(8):2211-2223; doi:10.1093/brain/awl154
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/8/2211    most recent
awl154v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reilly, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sirigu, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reilly, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sirigu, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Persistent hand motor commands in the amputees' brain

Karen T. Reilly1,2,4, Catherine Mercier1,2, Marc H. Schieber3,4 and Angela Sirigu1,2

1 Institut des Sciences Cognitives France 2 Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon France 3 Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Rochester, NY, USA 4 Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester Rochester, NY, USA

Correspondence to: Dr Angela Sirigu, Institut des Sciences Cognitives, CNRS, 67, Boulevard Pinel, 69675 Bron, France E-mail: sirigu{at}isc.cnrs.fr

The loss of a limb leads to sensorimotor modifications that are frequently accompanied by the vivid experience that the missing limb is still present, and that it can be moved at will. Furthermore, amputees can clearly distinguish between phantom movements of the fingers and of more proximal joints, like movements of the elbow. This phenomenon raises the question of whether these specific phantom movement experiences are translated into differentiated activity within the remaining muscles. We recorded stump muscle activity when above-elbow amputees voluntarily moved their phantom limb. Voluntary movements of the phantom hand triggered specific patterns of stump muscle activity, which differed from activity recorded in the same muscle groups during movements of the proximal limb. This result indicates that the brain's motor areas can be differentially activated according to the phantom movement the patient intends to perform, and suggests that hand motor commands are preserved after amputation. To further understand the interaction between central commands and sensory feedback in the perception of phantom movement we also measured stump muscle EMG activity in an amputee experiencing a frozen phantom limb, and in three below-elbow amputees with vivid phantom movements after inducing an ischaemic block. Failed attempts to move the paralysed phantom limb always resulted in the same EMG pattern, no matter what type of phantom movement was attempted, while ischaemic nerve block reduced or eliminated the ability to voluntarily move the phantom limb and produced a dramatic reduction in the amplitude of stump muscle EMG activity. Our data suggest that the experience of phantom hand movement involves the activation of hand motor commands. We propose that preserved hand movement representations re-target the stump muscles to express themselves and that when these representations are voluntarily accessible they can instruct the remaining muscles to move in such a way as if the limb is still there.

Key Words: amputation; phantom limb; motor command; hand; motor cortex

Received January 17, 2006. Revised May 11, 2006. Accepted May 11, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
C. Mercier and A. Sirigu
Training With Virtual Visual Feedback to Alleviate Phantom Limb Pain
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 587 - 594.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. D. Vargas, A. Aballea, E. C. Rodrigues, K. T. Reilly, C. Mercier, P. Petruzzo, J. M. Dubernard, and A. Sirigu
Re-emergence of hand-muscle representations in human motor cortex after hand allograft
PNAS, April 28, 2009; 106(17): 7197 - 7202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
K. MacIver, D. M. Lloyd, S. Kelly, N. Roberts, and T. Nurmikko
Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery
Brain, August 1, 2008; 131(8): 2181 - 2191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
K. T. Reilly and A. Sirigu
The Motor Cortex and Its Role in Phantom Limb Phenomena
Neuroscientist, April 1, 2008; 14(2): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
H.-J. Lee, E. Truy, G. Mamou, D. Sappey-Marinier, and A.-L. Giraud
Visual speech circuits in profound acquired deafness: a possible role for latent multimodal connectivity
Brain, November 1, 2007; 130(11): 2929 - 2941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. N. Levine
Persistent hand movement representations in the brains of amputees
Brain, February 1, 2007; 130(2): e65 - e65.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
K. T. Reilly, C. Mercier, M. H. Schieber, and A. Sirigu
Reply: Persistent hand commands in the motor cortex of amputees' brain
Brain, February 1, 2007; 130(2): e66 - e66.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. Mercier, K. T. Reilly, C. D. Vargas, A. Aballea, and A. Sirigu
Mapping phantom movement representations in the motor cortex of amputees
Brain, August 1, 2006; 129(8): 2202 - 2210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.