Skip Navigation

Brain 2007 130(3):693-707; doi:10.1093/brain/awm007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shenton, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shenton, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Altered orbitofrontal sulcogyral pattern in schizophrenia

Motoaki Nakamura1,2, Paul G. Nestor1,3, Robert W. McCarley1, James J. Levitt1,2, Lillian Hsu1,2, Toshiro Kawashima1,2, Margaret Niznikiewicz1 and Martha E. Shenton1,2

1Clinical Neuroscience Division, Laboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Brockton Division, Brockton and Harvard Medical School, 2Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and 3Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence to: Prof. Martha E. Shenton, Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1249 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA E-mail: shenton{at}bwh.harvard.edu

Orbitofrontal alteration in schizophrenia has not been well characterized, likely due to marked anatomical variability. To investigate the presence of such alterations, we evaluated the sulcogyral pattern of this ‘H-shaped’ sulcus. Fifty patients with schizophrenia (100 hemispheres) and 50 age- and gender-matched control subjects (100 hemispheres) were evaluated using 3D high-spatial resolution MRI. Based on a previous study by Chiavaras and Petrides (2000), the sulcogyral pattern of the ‘H-shaped’ sulcus, which forms the boundaries of major orbitofrontal gyri, was classified into three types (Type I, II and III, in order of frequency) within each hemisphere. Chi-square analysis was performed to compare the sulcogyral pattern, and categorical regression was applied to investigate clinical/cognitive associations. The control data replicated the orbitofrontal sulcogyral pattern reported by Chiavaras and Petrides (P = 0.90–0.95), where the distribution was significantly different between the left and right hemisphere (Type I: right > left, Type II, III: left > right, {chi}2 = 6.41, P = 0.041). For schizophrenics, the distribution differed significantly from controls ({chi}2 = 11.90, P = 0.003), especially in the right hemisphere ({chi}2 = 13.67, P = 0.001). Moreover, the asymmetry observed in controls was not present in schizophrenia ({chi}2 = 0.13, P = 0.94). Specifically, the most frequent Type I expression was decreased and the rarest Type III expression was increased in schizophrenia, relative to controls. Furthermore, patients with Type III expression in any hemisphere evinced poorer socioeconomic status, poorer cognitive function, more severe symptoms and impulsivity, compared to patients without Type III expression. In contrast, patients with Type I in any hemisphere showed better cognitive function and milder symptoms compared to patients without Type I. Structurally, patients with Type III had significantly smaller intra-cranial contents (ICC) volumes than did patients without Type III (t40 = 2.29, P = 0.027). The present study provides evidence of altered distribution of orbitofrontal sulcogyral pattern in schizophrenia, possibly reflecting a neurodevelopmental aberration in schizophrenia. Such altered sulcogyral pattern is unlikely to be due to secondary effects of the illness such as medication. Moreover, the structural association between Type III and small ICC volume, observed in the patient group, may suggest that Type III expression could be part of a systematic neurodevelopmental alteration, given that the small ICC volume could reflect early reduction of cranial growth driven by brain growth. The observed contrasting association of Type III expression with poorer outcome, and that of Type I expression with better outcome, further suggests clinical heterogeneity, and possible differences in treatment responsiveness in schizophrenia.

Key Words: schizophrenia; sulcus; orbitofrontal cortex; magnetic resonance imaging; neurodevelopment

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; ICC, intra-cranial contents; IQ, intelligence quotient; LOS, lateral orbital sulcus; MOS, medial orbital sulcus; MPQ, multidimensional personality questionnaire; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; PANSS, positive and negative syndrome scale; TOS, transverse orbital sulcus; WAIS-III, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd edition; WCST, Wisconsin card sorting test

Received October 16, 2006. Revised January 9, 2007. Accepted January 11, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Nakamura, P. G. Nestor, J. J. Levitt, A. S. Cohen, T. Kawashima, M. E. Shenton, and R. W. McCarley
Orbitofrontal volume deficit in schizophrenia and thought disorder
Brain, January 1, 2008; 131(1): 180 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.