Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on July 11, 2007
Brain 2007 130(8):2146-2158; doi:10.1093/brain/awm145
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
130/8/2146    most recent
awm145v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sainburg, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sainburg, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control

Sydney Y. Schaefer1,4, Kathleen Y. Haaland5,6 and Robert L. Sainburg1,2,3,4

1Departments of Kinesiology, 2Neurology, 3The Penn State Neuroscience Institute and 4The Gerontology Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA,5Research Service, New Mexico Veterans Affairs Healthcare System and 6Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA

Correspondence to: Dr Robert L. Sainburg, Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, 266 Recreation Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA E-mail: rls45{at}psu.edu

Recent reports of functional impairment in the ‘unaffected’ limb of stroke patients have suggested that these deficits vary with the side of lesion. This not only supports the idea that the ipsilateral hemisphere contributes to arm movements, but also implies that such contributions are lateralized. We have previously suggested that the left and right hemispheres are specialized for controlling different features of movement. In reaching movements, the non-dominant arm appears better adapted for achieving accurate final positions and the dominant arm for specifying initial trajectory features, such as movement direction and peak acceleration. The purpose of this study was to determine whether different features of control could characterize ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke. Healthy control subjects and patients with either left- or right-hemisphere damage performed targeted single-joint elbow movements of different amplitudes in their ipsilateral hemispace. We predicted that left-hemisphere damage would produce deficits in specification of initial trajectory features, while right-hemisphere damage would produce deficits in final position accuracy. Consistent with our predictions, patients with left, but not right, hemisphere damage showed reduced modulation of acceleration amplitude. However, patients with right, but not left, hemisphere damage showed significantly larger errors in final position, which corresponded to reduced modulation of acceleration duration. Neither patient group differed from controls in terms of movement speed. Instead, the mechanisms by which speed was specified, through modulation of acceleration amplitude and modulation of acceleration duration, appeared to be differentially affected by left- and right-hemisphere damage. These findings support the idea that each hemisphere contributes differentially to the control of initial trajectory and final position, and that ipsilesional deficits following stroke reflect this lateralization in control.

Key Words: lateralization; stroke; control; arm movements

Abbreviations: EMG, electromyography

Received March 6, 2007. Revised May 16, 2007. Accepted May 29, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Brus-Ramer, J. B. Carmel, and J. H. Martin
Motor Cortex Bilateral Motor Representation Depends on Subcortical and Interhemispheric Interactions
J. Neurosci., May 13, 2009; 29(19): 6196 - 6206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Chakrabarty, K. M. Friel, and J. H. Martin
Activity-Dependent Plasticity Improves M1 Motor Representation and Corticospinal Tract Connectivity
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1283 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Bedard and J. N. Sanes
Gaze and Hand Position Effects on Finger-Movement-Related Human Brain Activation
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 834 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. K. Rinehart, R. D. Singleton, J. C. Adair, J. R. Sadek, and K. Y. Haaland
Arm Use After Left or Right Hemiparesis Is Influenced by Hand Preference
Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): 545 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. A. Shabbott and R. L. Sainburg
Differentiating Between Two Models of Motor Lateralization
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 565 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. J. Goble and S. H. Brown
Upper Limb Asymmetries in the Matching of Proprioceptive Versus Visual Targets
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 3063 - 3074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Scheidt and C. Ghez
Separate Adaptive Mechanisms for Controlling Trajectory and Final Position in Reaching
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3600 - 3613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.