Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on June 20, 2008
Brain 2008 131(7):1895-1902; doi:10.1093/brain/awn120
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
131/7/1895    most recent
awn120v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isaias, I. U.
Right arrow Articles by Tagliati, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isaias, I. U.
Right arrow Articles by Tagliati, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Outcome predictors of pallidal stimulation in patients with primary dystonia: the role of disease duration

Ioannis U. Isaias1, Ron L. Alterman2 and Michele Tagliati1

1Department of Neurology and 2Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA

Correspondence to: Michele Tagliati, MD, Associate Professor of Neurology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 5 East 98th Street, Box 1139, New York, NY 10029, USA E-mail: michele.tagliati{at}mssm.edu

Pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) is currently the most effective treatment for advanced, medically refractory dystonia. However, factors predicting clinical outcome are not well defined. We reviewed the clinical records of 39 consecutive patients with medically refractory primary dystonia who underwent pallidal DBS implants. Thirty-five patients were implanted bilaterally and four unilaterally. Seven patients had fixed skeletal deformities (FSD). The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores at baseline, 3 and 12 months after DBS were used to evaluate clinical outcome. We investigated the outcome predictive role of several demographic and clinical factors. FSD patients had a significantly inferior outcome at 12 months, mostly affected by axial scores. All other patients (n = 32) showed a remarkable improvement (median BFMDRS percentage improvement = 87.8). Only disease duration showed a significant correlation with DBS outcome at 3 and 12 months. No other demographic and baseline clinical features predicted DBS outcome. This study confirms that patients with primary, medically refractory dystonia are generally outstanding candidates for pallidal DBS, with the possible exception of axial FSD. Patients with shorter duration of disease may expect a better general outcome. No particular predictive value should be assigned to age at onset, age at surgery, severity of disease, DYT1 status and the presence of phasic or tonic involuntary movements.

Key Words: deep brain stimulation; globus pallidus; dystonia; outcome predictors; disease duration

Abbreviations: BFMDRS, Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale; DBS, deep brain stimulation; FSD, fixed skeletal deformities

Received March 12, 2008. Revised April 29, 2008. Accepted May 15, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PNHome page
W. Thevathasan and R. Gregory
Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders
Practical Neurology, February 1, 2010; 10(1): 16 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
I. U. Isaias, R. L. Alterman, and M. Tagliati
Deep Brain Stimulation for Primary Generalized Dystonia: Long-term Outcomes
Arch Neurol, April 1, 2009; 66(4): 465 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.