Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on July 15, 2009
Brain 2009 132(9):2356-2371; doi:10.1093/brain/awp176
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
132/9/2356    most recent
awp176v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bentley, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dolan, R.J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bentley, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dolan, R.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Modulation of fusiform cortex activity by cholinesterase inhibition predicts effects on subsequent memory

P. Bentley1,2, J. Driver1,3 and R.J. Dolan1

1 Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK 2 Deparment of Clinical Neuroscience, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RF, UK 3 UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK

Correspondence to: Paul Bentley, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK E-mail: p.bentley{at}imperial.ac.uk

Cholinergic influences on memory are likely to be expressed at several processing stages, including via well-recognized effects of acetylcholine on stimulus processing during encoding. Since previous studies have shown that cholinesterase inhibition enhances visual extrastriate cortex activity during stimulus encoding, especially under attention-demanding tasks, we tested whether this effect correlates with improved subsequent memory. In a within-subject physostigmine versus placebo design, we measured brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging while healthy and mild Alzheimer's disease subjects performed superficial and deep encoding tasks on face (and building) visual stimuli. We explored regions in which physostigmine modulation of face-selective neural responses correlated with physostigmine effects on subsequent recognition performance. In healthy subjects physostigmine led to enhanced later recognition for deep- versus superficially-encoded faces, which correlated across subjects with a physostigmine-induced enhancement of face-selective responses in right fusiform cortex during deep- versus superficial-encoding tasks. In contrast, the Alzheimer's disease group showed neither a depth of processing effect nor restoration of this with physostigmine. Instead, patients showed a task-independent improvement in confident memory with physostigmine, an effect that correlated with enhancements in face-selective (but task-independent) responses in bilateral fusiform cortices. Our results indicate that one mechanism by which cholinesterase inhibitors can improve memory is by enhancing extrastriate cortex stimulus selectivity at encoding, in a manner that for healthy people but not in Alzheimer's disease is dependent upon depth of processing.

Key Words: fMRI; cholinergic; Alzheimer's disease; physostigmine; memory

Received December 5, 2008. Revised May 13, 2009. Accepted May 22, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.