Skip Navigation



Brain Advance Access published online on December 11, 2008
Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awn333
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
132/3/722    most recent
awn333v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bastian, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choi, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bastian, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Walking flexibility after hemispherectomy: split-belt treadmill adaptation and feedback control

Julia T. Choi1,2, Eileen P. G. Vining3, Darcy S. Reisman1,4 and Amy J. Bastian1,5

1The Kennedy Krieger Institute, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, 3Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 4Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware and 5Department of Neuroscience, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Correspondence to: Amy Bastian, Kennedy Krieger Institute, 707 N. Broadway, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA E-mail: bastian{at}kennedykrieger.org

Walking flexibility depends on use of feedback or reactive control to respond to unexpected changes in the environment, and the ability to adapt feedforward or predictive control for sustained alterations. Recent work has demonstrated that cerebellar damage impairs feedforward adaptation, but not feedback control, during human split-belt treadmill walking. In contrast, focal cerebral damage from stroke did not impair either process. This led to the suggestion that cerebellar interactions with the brainstem are more important than those with cerebral structures for feedforward adaptation. Does complete removal of a cerebral hemisphere affect either of these processes? We studied split-belt walking in 10 children and adolescents (age 6–18 years) with hemispherectomy (i.e. surgical removal of one entire cerebral hemisphere) and 10 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Hemispherectomy did not impair reactive feedback control, though feedforward adaptation was impaired in some subjects. Specifically, some showed reduced or absent adaptation of inter-leg timing, whereas adaptation of spatial control was intact. These results suggest that the cerebrum is involved in adaptation of the timing, but not spatial, elements of limb movements.

Key Words: locomotion; children; motor learning

Received July 21, 2008. Revised September 25, 2008. Accepted November 13, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.