Skip Navigation



Brain Advance Access published online on March 2, 2009

Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awn362
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
132/3/635    most recent
awn362v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, K. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, K. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Retinotopically defined primary visual cortex in Williams syndrome

Rosanna K. Olsen1, J. Shane Kippenhan1, Shruti Japee1, Philip Kohn1, Carolyn B. Mervis2, Ziad S. Saad3, Colleen A. Morris4, Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg1,* and Karen Faith Berman1

1 Section on Integrative Neuroimaging, Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA 2 Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA 3 Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA 4 Department of Paediatrics, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, USA

Correspondence to: Karen F. Berman, 10 Centre Drive, Rm 4C101, Bethesda, MD 20892-1365, USA E-mail: karen.berman{at}nih.gov

Williams syndrome, caused by a hemizygous microdeletion on chromosome 7q11.23, is characterized by severe impairment in visuospatial construction. To examine potential contributions of early visual processing to this cognitive problem, we functionally mapped the size and neuroanatomical variability of primary visual cortex (V1) in high-functioning adults with Williams syndrome and age- and IQ-matched control participants from the general population by using fMRI-based retinotopic mapping and cortical surface models generated from high-resolution structural MRI. Visual stimulation, consisting of rotating hemicircles and expanding rings, was used to retinotopically define early visual processing areas. V1 boundaries based on computed phase and field sign maps were used to calculate the functional area of V1. Neuroanatomical variability was assessed by computing overlap maps of V1 location for each group on standardized cortical surfaces, and non-parametric permutation test methods were used for statistical inference. V1 did not differ in size between groups, although its anatomical boundaries were more variable in the group with Williams syndrome. V1 overlap maps showed that the average centres of gravity for the two groups were similarly located near the fundus of the calcarine fissure, ~25 mm away from the most posterior aspect of the occipital lobe. In summary, our functional definition of V1 size and location indicates that recruitment of primary visual cortex is grossly normal in Williams syndrome, consistent with the notion that neural abnormalities underlying visuospatial construction arise at later stages in the visual processing hierarchy.

Key Words: Williams syndrome; retinotopy; V1; primary visual cortex; visuospatial construction

.

Received May 16, 2008. Revised December 2, 2008. Accepted December 4, 2008.


*Present address: Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.