Brain Advance Access originally published online on June 8, 2009
Brain 2009 132(9):2593-2608; doi:10.1093/brain/awp146
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Different impairments of semantic cognition in semantic dementia and semantic aphasia: evidence from the non-verbal domain
1 Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 2 Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK
Correspondence to: Matthew A. Lambon Ralph, Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit (NARU), School of Psychological Sciences, Zochonis Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK E-mail: matt.lambon-ralph{at}manchester.ac.uk
Disorders of semantic cognition in different neuropsychological conditions result from diverse areas of brain damage and may have different underlying causes. This study used a comparative case-series design to examine the hypothesis that relatively circumscribed bilateral atrophy of the anterior temporal lobe in semantic dementia (SD) produces a gradual degradation of core semantic representations, whilst a deficit of cognitive control produces multi-modal semantic impairment in a subset of patients with stroke aphasia following damage involving the left prefrontal cortex or regions in and around the temporoparietal area; this condition, which transcends traditional aphasia classifications, is referred to as ‘semantic aphasia’ (SA). There have been very few direct comparisons of these patient groups to date and these previous studies have focussed on verbal comprehension. This study used a battery of object-use tasks to extend this line of enquiry into the non-verbal domain for the first time. A group of seven SA patients were identified who failed both word and picture versions of a semantic association task. These patients were compared with eight SD cases. Both groups showed significant deficits in object use but these impairments were qualitatively different. Item familiarity correlated with performance on object-use tasks for the SD group, consistent with the view that core semantic representations are degrading in this condition. In contrast, the SA participants were insensitive to the familiarity of the objects. Further, while the SD patients performed consistently across tasks that tapped different aspects of knowledge and object use for the same items, the performance of the SA participants reflected the control requirements of the tasks. Single object use was relatively preserved in SA but performance on complex mechanical puzzles was substantially impaired. Similarly, the SA patients were able to complete straightforward item matching tasks, such as word-picture matching, but performed more poorly on associative picture-matching tasks, even when the tests involved the same items. The two groups of patients also showed a different pattern of errors in object use. SA patients made substantial numbers of erroneous intrusions in their demonstrations, such as inappropriate object movements. In contrast, response omissions were more common in SD. This study provides converging evidence for qualitatively different impairments of semantic cognition in SD and SA, and uniquely demonstrates this pattern in a non-verbal expressive domain—object use.
Key Words: semantic dementia; stroke aphasia; semantic memory; semantic cognition; non-verbal; object use
Abbreviations: ATL, anterior temporal lobe; CCT, Camel and Cactus Task; PFC, prefrontal cortex; PPT, Pyramids and Palm Trees; SA, semantic aphasia; SD, semantic dementia
Received December 15, 2008. Revised April 26, 2009. Accepted April 28, 2009.