Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on June 9, 2009
Brain 2009 132(8):2231-2238; doi:10.1093/brain/awp155
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
132/8/2231    most recent
awp155v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miteff, F.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, M. W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miteff, F.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, M. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke

Ferdinand Miteff1,2, Christopher R. Levi1,2, Grant A. Bateman1, Neil Spratt1,2, Patrick McElduff2 and Mark W. Parsons1,2

1 Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle Region Mail Centre, New South Wales, Australia 2 Hunter Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Australia

Correspondence to: Ferdinand Miteff, Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1, Hunter Region Mail Centre, NSW 2310, Australia E-mail: ferdi.miteff{at}hnehealth.nsw.gov.au

It is unknown whether collateral vessel status, as seen on computed tomography angiography, can predict the fate of penumbral tissue identified on perfusion computed tomography and thereby influence clinical outcome. We tested this hypothesis in consecutive patients who underwent perfusion computed tomography/computed tomography angiography within 6 h of anterior circulation stroke, who also had repeat perfusion/infarct volume imaging at 24 h, and modified Rankin Scale at 3 months. Collateral status was graded as good or reduced depending on the extent of contrast visualized distal to the occlusion on computed tomography angiography. ‘Perfusion computed tomography mismatch’ ratio was calculated from the ratio of the mean transit time lesion/cerebral blood volume lesion. Of 92 patients with proximal intracranial vessel occlusion, good collateral status (51/92) was significantly associated with reduced infarct expansion and more favourable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0–2). Significant univariate predictors of favourable outcome were good collateral status, major reperfusion at 24 h, presence of perfusion computed tomography mismatch (for a range of ratios: ≥1.2, ≥2, ≥3, ≥3.5) and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. Notably, none of the 37 patients with a perfusion computed tomography mismatch ratio < 3.0 had a favourable outcome. In patients with perfusion computed tomography mismatch, significant independent predictors of favourable outcome were good collateral status, major reperfusion and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. There was also a strong interaction between major reperfusion and good collateral status in the regression models. In patients with proximal vessel occlusion, perfusion computed tomography mismatch is a prerequisite for a favourable clinical response, but good collateral status appears a critical determinant of ultimate outcome, particularly if major reperfusion occurs.

Key Words: leptomeningeal collateral vessel status; CT angiography; CT perfusion; acute ischaemic stroke; multimodal CT imaging

Abbreviations: CBV, cerebral blood volume; CTP, cerebral CT perfusion; DSA, digital subtraction angiography; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTT, mean transit time

Received January 10, 2009. Revised April 29, 2009. Accepted May 5, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.