Skip Navigation



Brain Advance Access published online on October 5, 2009

Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awp248
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
133/1/300    most recent
awp248v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodges, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hodges, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Semantic dementia: demography, familial factors and survival in a consecutive series of 100 cases

John R. Hodges1,2, Jo Mitchell2, Kate Dawson2, Maria Grazia Spillantini2, John H. Xuereb3, Paul McMonagle3, Peter J. Nestor2 and Karalyn Patterson4

1 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute (POWMRI), University of New South Wales, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia 2 University Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK 3 Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, UK 4 MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK

Correspondence to: Prof. John R. Hodges, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Cnr Barker & Easy Street, Randwick, NSW 2031, Sydney, Australia E-mail: j.hodges{at}powmri.edu.au

A great deal has been written about cognitive aspects of semantic dementia but little is known about the demography or prognosis. We describe these features in a consecutive series of 100 patients seen over a 17-year period; all cases were assessed and followed up in a specialist clinic. The mean age at diagnosis was 64.2 (±7.1) range 40–79 years, but 46 presented after age 65 and 7 after 75; a higher proportion than the existing literature might predict. Fifteen had a first-degree relative with dementia, but in seven this was almost certainly unrelated. Only two had relatives with young-onset dementia. There were no families with more than two affected members. The familial rate was estimated at between 2% and 7% (95% confidence interval 0–12%). Kaplan–Meier analyses indicated a 50% survival of 12.8 years (95% confidence interval 11.9–13.7); a more benign course than suggested by neuropathologically based studies. We were unable to identify any factors influencing survival. Of the 100, 34 have died, with pathological confirmation in 24; 18 had frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions (13 of 13 confirmed TAR DNA binding protein-43 positive), and 3 had classic tau-positive Pick bodies and 3 had Alzheimer's pathology. The age at diagnosis or death across the pathological subgroups was equivalent. Although semantic dementia has a strong statistical association with ubiquitin-positive pathology, it does not have the signature of familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions, notably the presence of intranuclear lentiform TAR DNA binding protein-43 inclusions. The age of onset is older than predicted and the course more slowly progressive than suggested by earlier studies of small groups of subjects.

Key Words: frontotemporal dementia; semantic dementia; ubiquitin pathology; TDP43

Abbreviations: ACE, Addenbrooke's cognitive examination; CDR, clinical dementia rating; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; FTLD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration; FTLD-tau, classic tau-positive Pick body frontotemporal dementia; FTLD-U, frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive tau-negative inclusions; MMSE, mini-mental state examination; NPI, the neuropsychiatric inventory; TDP, TAR DNA binding protein

Received June 1, 2009. Revised July 30, 2009. Accepted August 22, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.