Brain Advance Access published online on October 5, 2009
Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awp252
Relating visual to verbal semantic knowledge: the evaluation of object recognition in prosopagnosia
1 Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada 2 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada 3 Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada 4 Faculty of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
Correspondence to:
Jason J. S. Barton MD, PhD, FRCPC, Neuro-ophthalmology Section K, VGH Eye Care Centre, 2550 Willow Street, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V5Z-3N9 E-mail: jasonbarton{at}shaw.ca
Assessment of face specificity in prosopagnosia is hampered by difficulty in gauging pre-morbid expertise for non-face object categories, for which humans vary widely in interest and experience. In this study, we examined the correlation between visual and verbal semantic knowledge for cars to determine if visual recognition accuracy could be predicted from verbal semantic scores. We had 33 healthy subjects and six prosopagnosic patients first rated their own knowledge of cars. They were then given a test of verbal semantic knowledge that presented them with the names of car models, to which they were to match the manufacturer. Lastly, they were given a test of visual recognition, presenting them with images of cars to which they were to provide information at three levels of specificity: model, manufacturer and decade of make. In controls, while self-ratings were only moderately correlated with either visual recognition or verbal semantic knowledge, verbal semantic knowledge was highly correlated with visual recognition, particularly for more specific levels of information. Item concordance showed that less-expert subjects were more likely to provide the most specific information (model name) for the image when they could also match the manufacturer to its name. Prosopagnosic subjects showed reduced visual recognition of cars after adjusting for verbal semantic scores. We conclude that visual recognition is highly correlated with verbal semantic knowledge, that formal measures of verbal semantic knowledge are a more accurate gauge of expertise than self-ratings, and that verbal semantic knowledge can be used to adjust tests of visual recognition for pre-morbid expertise in prosopagnosia.
Key Words: semantic memory; vision; object recognition; face processing
Received April 4, 2009. Revised June 24, 2009. Accepted August 21, 2009.