Skip Navigation

Brain 2005 128(10):2217-2218; doi:10.1093/brain/awh637
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Brain
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Compston, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Compston, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Editorial

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In 1965, we published a paper by Norman Geschwind (1926–1984) on ‘Disconnection syndromes in animals and man’ (Brain 1965; 88: 237–294 and 585–644). Merely to describe this as a landmark paper is not to do the scholarship justice. ‘Disconnection syndromes in animals and man’ illuminated otherwise incomprehensible neurological syndromes, but the exposition also allowed the reader to consider rival concepts on how the cerebrum is organized and to ponder the strictly disconnectionist formulation that Geschwind proposed to explain bizarre clinical phenomenology. It seemed so simple to understand that occlusion of the left posterior cerebral artery causes a right homonymous hemianopia and, at the same time, lesions the posterior part (splenium) of the corpus callosum thus isolating an intact right visual cortex from the left angular gyrus needed to decode visual engrams, but leaving unaffected the ability to generate graphemes already learned, thus resulting in alexia without agraphia. Geschwind presented . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Alastair Compston

Cambridge


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Brain:

Editorial
Alastair Compston
Brain 2006 129: 283-284. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, October 8, 2005; 331(7520): 854 - 854.
[Full Text] [PDF]