Skip Navigation

Brain 2006 129(6):1351-1356; doi:10.1093/brain/awl131
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillis, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hillis, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Scientific Commentaries

The right place at the right time?

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Language functions that are disrupted by focal lesions in the left hemisphere often recover substantially over time. It has long been hypothesized that the right hemisphere gradually assumes language functions that have been impaired by left hemisphere lesions. This hypothesis has received support from a variety of sources. Individuals who recover from aphasia after stroke often become aphasic again after right hemisphere lesions (Nielson, 1946Go; Levine and Mohr, 1979Go) or after sodium amytal injection in the right carotid artery (Kinsbourne, 1971Go), consistent with the hypothesis that language had ‘crossed’ to the right hemisphere. Likewise, functional neuroimaging studies have often revealed more activation in the right hemisphere during language tasks in recovered aphasic patients compared to healthy controls (Weiller et al., 1995Go; Ohyama et al., 1996Go; Cappa et al., 1997Go; Musso et al., 1999Go. . . [Full Text of this Article]

Argye E. Hillis

Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA E-mail: argye@jhmi.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
R M Lazar, A E Speizer, J R Festa, J W Krakauer, and R S Marshall
Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 79(5): 530 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Richter, W. H. R. Miltner, and T. Straube
Association between therapy outcome and right-hemispheric activation in chronic aphasia
Brain, May 1, 2008; 131(5): 1391 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]