Brain, Vol. 123, No. 7, 1505-1515,
July 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press
Preserved slow conducting corticomotoneuronal projections in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with autosomal recessive D90A CuZn-superoxide dismutase mutation
1 The Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Vancouver Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada and 2 Department of Neurology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
Correspondence to:
Dr A. Eisen, Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Vancouver Hospital, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1M9 E-mail: eisen{at}unixg.ubc.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, a subgroup of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) syndrome associated with mutations in the gene encoding the free radical scavenging enzyme CuZn-superoxide dismutase (CuZn-SOD, SOD1) has been identified. Some 67 different mutations have been reported worldwide to date, comprising about one-fifth of familial ALS cases in the populations studied. The autosomal recessively inherited D90A CuZn-SOD mutation has been associated with a very slowly progressive, clinically distinct phenotype, and is neurophysiologically characterized by very slow central motor conduction. It is not known which physiological and/or biochemical mechanisms are responsible for the different clinical course. To delineate ALS associated with this particular CuZn-SOD mutation from ALS without mutations, we performed a detailed neurophysiological study of the corticomotoneuronal function using peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) in eight ALS patients homozygous for the D90A CuZn-SOD mutation. The results were compared with those obtained in 12 non-hereditary ALS patients and 11 healthy subjects. PSTHs were constructed from three to seven different, voluntarily recruited motor units of the extensor digitorum communis muscle (EDC) in each patient. The onset latency, number of excess bins, duration and synchrony of the primary peak were analysed. All measurements differed significantly between healthy controls and the D90A patients (P < 0.0007). The mean onset latency of the primary peak in D90A patients was 35.3 ms, compared with 24.2 ms for non-hereditary ALS patients and 19.3 ms for normal subjects (P < 0.0000). Delayed primary peaks in the D90A patients were desynchronized and characteristically preceded by a marked suppression phase. This suppression phase was not seen in non-hereditary ALS patients. We conclude that the mainly slow conducting and/or polysynaptic corticomotoneuronal connections are preserved in the D90A homozygous cases, and that the cortical and possibly spinal inhibitory circuitry is preserved. These events may partially protect the motor neurons, slowing down the degenerative process.
ALS; corticomotoneuronal system; D90A; CuZn-SOD mutation; central motor conduction time
ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CMCT = central motor conduction time; CUSUM = cumulative sum analysis; CuZn-SOD = CuZn-superoxide dismutase; EDC = extensor digitorum communis muscle; EPSP = exctitatory post-synaptic potential; FALS = familial ALS; LMN = lower motor neuron; MEP = motor evoked potentials; MUP = motor unit potential; PSTH = peristimulus time histogram; UMN = upper motor neuron
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 1993 a collaborative consortium (Rosen et al., 1993
While most patients with a dominantly inherited CuZn-SOD mutation show variable phenotypes with different sites of onset and survival time indistinguishable from patients without a CuZn-SOD mutation (Radunovic and Leigh, 1996
), ALS patients homozygous for the D90A CuZn-SOD mutation show a very characteristic and uniform disease phenotype irrespective of ethnic background (Andersen et al., 1996
).
At least two-thirds of D90A homozygous patients experience an insidious pre-paretic phase with lower extremity stiffness and cramps, unsteadiness or clumsiness, and general fatigue. Approximately half of patients complain of burning or aching pain in the lower back, buttocks, hips and/or legs. The pre-paretic phase lasts from a few months to a few years during which time the clinical and neurophysiological studies are reportedly normal. This initial phase is followed by a stereotypic paretic phase with slowly ascending usually asymmetric paresis, with a combination of lower motor neuron (LMN) and upper motor neuron (UMN) findings such as muscle wasting, fasciculations, spastic tone, absent ankle and brisk upper extremity reflexes, and bilateral Babinski signs. This is followed by a slow progression to the upper extremities with distal paresis occuring prior to proximal paresis, occasional clumsiness and fasciculations. In all four limbs, signs of an UMN lesion appear before signs of LMN involvement with a characteristic pathological reflex pattern (Andersen et al., 1997
). Upper extremity involvement appears on average 4.1 years and bulbar symptoms on average 5.4 years after onset of the first symptoms distally in the lower extremities. Bulbar symptoms, especially, progress very slowly, and only very late in the disease do D90A homozygous patients develop aphonia, anarthria and aphagia (Andersen et al., 1996
). Mean survival time from onset of paresis is 12.6 years (n = 16) (Andersen et al., 1997
). In most of the patients, LMN features dominate over UMN features during the progression of the disease. Urgency of micturition and/or difficulty initiating urination are common in some patients even early in the disease (Andersen et al., 1996
), which supports neuropathological findings in patients with different CuZn-SOD mutations that the disease process is not restricted to the motor system (Ince et al., 1998
).
Marked slowing of central motor conduction has been reported earlier in D90A homozygous patients and in single FALS cases heterozygous for the D76Y and K12A mutation (Andersen et al., 1996
; Andersen, 1997
; Penco et al., 1999
). This is unusual for ALS in which central motor conduction time (CMCT) is normal or very modestly slowed (Ingram and Swash, 1987
; Thompson et al., 1987
; Schriefer et al., 1989
; Eisen et al., 1990
; Berardelli et al., 1991
). The slow progressive course and characteristic neurophysiological findings in D90A homozygous cases makes this particular mutation an ideal model to study UMN dysfunction in ALS, prompting us to perform a detailed study of central motor function in these patients.
| Subjects and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We studied eight patients homozygous for the D90A mutation (mean age 54.1 ± 8.5 years, range 4666 years). Twelve patients with El Escorial definite (Brooks, 1994
|
With informed consent, peripheral blood samples were drawn, the DNA was extracted using standard procedures and analysed for CuZn-SOD mutations, as described earlier (Andersen et al., 1995
Routine neurophysiological studies
Needle EMG studies were performed using a monopolar needle electrode (Dantec 13R1, Dantec Elektronik, Skovlunde, Denmark). Six upper and lower limb muscles, paraspinal muscles and the chest wall musculature, including the diaphragm, were examined. Motor and sensory (orthodromic method) nerve conduction studies including F-waves were performed on the median, ulnar, tibial and sural nerves. Recordings were made with surface electrodes (Medicotest E-10-VS, Medicotest, Ølstykke, Denmark).
A Dantec Magpro II magnetic stimulator (Dantec MMC 140) was used to deliver stimuli to the contralateral motor cortex and the cervical roots through a large, cup-shaped, round coil. Surface recordings were made from the extensor digitorum communis muscle (EDC). For cortical stimulation the same preactivation was used as for single motor unit studies. CMCT was calculated by subtracting the latency after cervical stimulation from the latency after cortical stimulation.
Single unit recordings
We studied 36 different motor units in the D90A patients, 49 motor units in the control subjects and 58 motor units in the patients with non-hereditary ALS. The EDC was used for PSTH studies. The strength of this muscle in the patients was MRC (Medical Research Council) grade 45 or greater.
Post-synaptic events occurring in EDC spinal motor neurons were derived from changes in the firing probability of single, voluntarily activated motor units induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation to the contralateral motor cortex. The technique used has been described previously (Eisen et al., 1996
). Subjects sat comfortably with their arms pronated on a pillow. A monopolar needle electrode was used to record motor unit potentials (MUPs) from the EDC. Subjects were instructed to maintain steady recruitment of a single motor unit. This was aided by auditory and visual feedback of the spike discharges. A window discriminator was used to separate the indexed motor unit from other, contaminating motor units. Only units whose amplitudes exceeded 150 V and whose rise times were <50 s were accepted.
The magnetic stimulator, which was supported on a stand, delivered stimuli to the contralateral motor cortex. The scalp site at which the lowest intensity stimulus capable of inducing a visible muscle contraction of the EDC was located. While the subject or patient maintained a steady recruitment of the indexed motor unit the stimulus output was then adjusted to an intensity just below that which evoked a complex response consisting of two or more motor units. This intensity is referred to as the activated threshold, which was then reduced by 2.5% of the stimulator output and a series of 100200 stimuli were randomly delivered at intervals of 1 to 5 s. In each individual, three to seven different motor units were examined sequentially. It was assumed that during repositioning of the needle electrode, there would be movement of the subject's head relative to the coil and that levels of activation would vary with the newly recruited indexed MUP. This necessitated re-adjusting the stimulus intensity between each MUP studied by increasing it in 2.5% increments until the compound motor evoked potential (MEP) was again evoked and then reducing it by 2.5%. Identification of the indexed motor unit was verified off-line by visual inspection of individual sweeps. If the post-stimulus indexed motor unit was contaminated with other MUPs the sweep was discarded. The average number of sweeps included in each histogram was 140.9 ± 40.1 for the D90A patients, 95.9 ± 7.1 for normal subjects and 97.1 ± 24.0 for the non-hereditary ALS patients. Discharges of an indexed motor unit were collected into 1-ms bins of stimulus-triggered sweeps and changes in the firing probability were expressed as a PSTH (Fig. 1
). Each stimulus-triggered sweep had a total analysis time of 250 ms (50 ms before the stimulus and 200 ms after the stimulus). An initial period of increased firing probability (the primary peak) was readily discernible in the PSTHs occurring at about 2050 ms after the stimulus. An excess bin was defined as a bin with a count exceeding the mean pre-stimulus background by >2 SD.
|
The following measurements were made from the PSTHs. (i) Onset latency of the primary peak was defined as the first excess bin after the stimulus. (ii) The duration of the primary peak was measured from the time interval between the first and the last excess bin terminated by a period of clear suppression (inhibition phase). CUSUM (cumulative sum analysis) was used to determine the beginning of the primary peak and any intervening inhibitory phases in the PSTHs (Fig. 1BD
![]() |
The equation assumes a membrane potential excursion of 10 mV (65 to 55 mV) at a firing rate of 10 Hz (Ashby and Zilm, 1982
; Day et al., 1987
).
Statistical analysis
The UNISTAT version 4.0 for Windows was used for data analysis. Differences among the three groups (D90A, controls and non-hereditary ALS) were first analysed by one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance). In instances where significant differences were found, analysis was continued with multiple comparisons (F-test, t-test) to determine differences among groups. If the F-test revealed significantly different variances the separate variance t-test was applied, otherwise the pooled variance t-test was used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The clinical data of the patients are summarized in Table 1A and B
The mean age of onset of the patients with non-hereditary ALS was 51.3 ± 19.2 years; the disease duration, defined as the time after onset of obvious neurological deficit, was 27.1 ± 14.5 months.
Routine neurophysiological studies
There was evidence for active denervation with fibrillation and/or positive sharp waves in two or more limbs in six of eight D90A patients. Chronic neurogenic changes consisting of complex, unstable motor unit potentials in three or more muscles were present in all the patients except in patient 1 who had sparse evidence of LMN disease limited to the EDC. Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies including F-waves were normal.
The mean MEP onset latency to the EDC muscle after cortical stimulation in the D90A patients measured 30.7 ± 7.2 ms (normal 17.9 ± 1.9 ms) and the mean CMCT measured 21.4 ± 6.3 ms (normal 8.5 ± 1.3 ms). Figure 2A
depicts the individual values for the MEP latencies and CMCTs of the D90A patients, and the upper normal limits (22.6 ms and 9.7 ms, respectively). It was not possible to determine a clear onset latency to the MEP after cervical stimulation in two patients, precluding calculation of their CMCTs (Fig. 2A
).
|
Single unit recordings
A primary peak in the PSTH was identified in all the indexed motor units studied except for one in a patient with sporadic ALS. In normal subjects the primary peak of the PSTH was well synchronized with a mean onset latency of 19.3 ± 2.8 ms (Figs 1A and 2B
D90A patients
In the D90A patients, 31 out of 36 (86%) of the primary peaks were profoundly delayed in onset (>31 ms) and desynchronized (Figs 1B and 2B![]()
). If the primary peaks of patient 1 (Table 1
), who also had a normal CMCT, are excluded then there is only one other primary peak with a normal onset latency. The delayed primary peaks were always preceded by a prominent suppression phase. This commenced 22.1 ± 4.2 ms after the stimulus and its duration ranged from 3 to 19 ms (mean duration 13.1 ± 4.3 ms). No firing of the indexed motor unit was observed during this suppression phase (Fig. 1B
).
Non-hereditary ALS patients
In non-hereditary ALS patients, the primary peak was also very desynchronized. This occurred with and without delay in the onset of the primary peak (Fig. 1C and D
). Primary peaks with a normal onset latency consisted occasionally of a double peak (Fig. 1C
). A delay of the primary peak onset of greater than 31 ms occurred in 15 motor units, but was seen in five out of 12 patients (Fig. 1D
). CUSUM indicated that there was a slightly reduced firing probability preceding the delayed primary peaks in four out of 15 delayed primary peaks. This suppression never exceeded 3 ms in duration (Fig. 1D
).
Statistical analysis
In the D90A patients, all PSTH measurements were significantly different from normal subjects. Significant differences for the onset latency, number of excess bins, duration and estimated amplitude were found in patients with non-hereditary ALS when compared with normal subjects (Table 2
).
|
We further analysed the delayed primary peaks in D90A patients and non-hereditary ALS after excluding all primary peaks with a normal onset latency (Table 3
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All the D90A patients we studied demonstrated phenotypic clinical characteristics with a slowly progressive paraparesis, and all but one of the patients had the characteristic prolonged CMCT. The patient with normal central motor conduction had no clinical signs of UMN involvement in the upper limbs, which may explain this finding. Prolongation of central motor conduction, as seen in the D90A mutation patients, is atypical in non-hereditary ALS in which central motor conduction is usually reported as normal or marginally prolonged. (Ingram and Swash, 1987
There are other explanations for slowing of central conduction. They include (i) conduction through a slowly conducting monosynaptic (corticomotoneuronal) or polysynaptic (corticospinal) projection (Porter and Lemon, 1993
; Mills, 1995
; Kohara et al., 1996
); (ii) delayed initiation of corticomotoneuronal volleys resulting in late occurring I waves (Mills, 1995
); and (iii) failure of the anterior horn cell to respond to the descending volley. The results of the single unit recordings and PSTHs were helpful in distinguishing these possibilities.
Physiology
Modulations in the firing of a single motor unit in response to an imposed transcranial stimulus (or other stimulus) can be studied using a PSTH (Ashby and Zilm, 1982
; Fetz and Gustafsson, 1983
; Day et al., 1987
, 1989
; Brouwer and Ashby, 1990
; Palmer and Ashby, 1992; Mills, 1999
). Changes in the firing probability of the motor unit after the stimulus are seen as peaks and troughs in the PSTH. More subtle deviations from the baseline can be detected using the CUSUM (Ellaway, 1978
). A single threshold magnetic stimulus to the motor cortex excites many corticomotoneurons. However, a subset of these, the cortical colony, converge on to a single spinal motor neuron. The compound EPSP generated at the anterior horn cell is a summated composite of the unitary EPSPs evoked at each synapse.
Single cortical stimuli evoke up to six descending volleys termed D and I waves (Kernell and Wu, 1967
; Day et al., 1987
; Nakamura et al., 1997
; Di Lazzaro et al., 1998
). In normal subjects, arrival of these volleys is seen in the PSTH as a well synchronized peak (the primary peak), occurring at ~20 ms after the stimulus. This has been ascribed to impulse traffic through fast conducting, monosynaptic corticomotoneuronal projections (Day et al., 1987
, 1989
; Porter and Lemon, 1993
; de Noordhout et al., 1999
). The primary peak may have several subcomponents reflecting the sequential arrival of subsequent descending volleys (Kernell and Wu, 1967
; Day et al., 1987
, 1989
; Mills, 1995
). In normal subjects there are rarely more than three subcomponents to the primary peak and the total duration of the primary peak does not exceed 6 ms so that the interval between subcomponents is ~2 ms (Day et al., 1989
; Mills, 1995
; Eisen et al., 1996
; Kohara et al., 1996
). The onset of the primary peak usually corresponds closely to the onset of the surface evoked MEP (Day et al., 1989
; Kohara et al., 1999
).
Slow conduction in non-hereditary ALS
In sporadic ALS several different abnormalities of the primary peak have been reported (Awiszus and Feistner, 1993
, 1995
; Mills, 1995
; Eisen et al., 1996
; Kohara et al., 1996
; Nakajima et al., 1997
; Weber et al., 2000
). The most frequent is desynchronization of the primary peak, characterized by an increased number of excess bins and prolonged duration. Frequently, as found in our non-hereditary ALS patients, two distinct peaks (`a double peak') are recognizable. The interval between the two peaks can be up to 17 ms (Kohara et al., 1996
, , 1999
; Weber et al., 2000
). The later peak often has a longer duration than the earlier one. Two peaks within the primary peak separated by such a long interval suggests that two subpopulations of corticomotoneuronal connections are stimulated: a fast conducting monosynaptic pathway originating from large Betz cells and a slow conducting pathway which may be mono- or polysynaptic (Mills, 1995
; Kohara et al., 1996
; Weber et al., 2000
). The occurrence of double peaks may be relatively specific to ALS; they are rarely seen in other UMN diseases such as multiple sclerosis or cerebrovascular disease (Boniface et al., 1991
; Kohara et al., 1996
, 1999
). With progression of ALS the earlier peak may be lost, resulting in profoundly delayed onset to the primary peak (>31 ms) (Weber et al., 2000
).
None of the abnormalities described in the PSTH for ALS patients are seen in Kennedy's disease or spinal muscular atrophy, which do not have a UMN component (Kohara et al., 1996
, 1999
; Weber and Eisen, 1999
). It is concluded that the abnormalities of the primary peak seen for ALS patients are due to supraspinal mechanisms. Further support for this comes from the observation that in the same spinal motor neuron that produces an abnormal response to cortical stimulation in ALS patients, the response to Ia afferent input is normal (Awiszus and Feistner, 1995
; Nakajima et al., 1996
).
Slow conduction in D90A patients
In our D90A patients, the PSTHs were characterized by profoundly delayed, desynchronized primary peaks, with the additional finding of a marked suppression phase which preceded the primary peak (see Fig. 1B
). A period of inhibition preceding the primary peak has not been recorded in our non-hereditary ALS patients. Even though the onset latency of the primary peak in D90A patients was slightly longer compared with the delayed primary peaks in non-hereditary ALS patients, the threshold required to activate the motor neurons was the same in both groups. This suggests that the same subpopulation of slow conducting corticomotoneuronal or corticospinal connections was being stimulated in D90A patients and non-hereditary ALS cases with delayed primary peaks. The slightly but significantly longer onset of delayed primary peaks in the D90A patients can be explained on the basis of the marked inhibitory phase preceding the primary peak in these patients.
It is also possible that the delayed primary peaks seen in non-hereditary ALS and D90A patients could result from the very late arrival of D and I waves caused by faulty initiation of descending volleys (Mills, 1995
). However, such long intervals between subsequent descending volleys have not been described and normally even late I waves occur within 6 ms after the D wave (Day et al., 1989
; Boniface et al., 1991
; Nakamura et al., 1997
).
The most plausible explanation for delayed primary peaks in ALS, including D90A patients, is activation of a slow conducting corticospinal pathway. These have been demonstrated in the cat (Takakashi et al., 1965) and monkey (Lemon et al., 1993
). Recently, a slow conducting pathway could be stimulated in patients with idiopathic paraparesis using high intensity electrical motor cortex and brainstem stimulation (Ugawa and Kanazawa, 1999
).
At low stimulus intensity, transcranial magnetic stimulation preferentially activates large, fast conducting pyramidal cells (Rossini, 1988
). At higher stimulus intensities, as was required in the D90A patients and in the cases of non-hereditary ALS patients who had delayed primary peaks, the smaller, slow conducting pyramidal neurons are activated. In primary lateral sclerosis, which is also characterized by very slow central conduction (Pringle et al., 1992
; Salerno et al., 1996
), complete absence of Betz cells from layer 5 and a decreased number of pyramidal neurons in layers 3 and 5 of the precentral motor cortex are typical. Similar changes, although to a lesser degree, can be found in ALS (Pringle et al., 1992
). The absence of an early peak in the PSTH and delayed MEPs, as seen in the D90A patients, suggests that the fast conducting pyramidal cells are lost or unexcitable. Conversely, the present and previous physiological studies (Kohara et al., 1999
; Weber et al., 2000
) imply that the slow motor pathways are relatively protected in ALS. This seems particularly so in cases with the D90A mutation. The fact that the number of excess bins and the duration and estimated amplitude of the underlying EPSP were significantly larger in the D90A patients than in sporadic ALS patients, suggests a strong input to the spinal anterior horn cell. However, it cannot be ruled out that in cases with the D90A mutation, multiple pathways contribute to the primary peak.
Role of cortical inhibition
In sporadic ALS there is evidence to indicate that there is dysfunction or demise of modulating inhibitory interneurons resulting in diminished inhibition (Caramia et al., 1991
; Eisen et al., 1993
; Prout and Eisen, 1994
; Disiato et al., 1997
; Mills and Nithi, 1997
). Protection of the central motor pathways and their connections to the anterior horn cells, as clinically evident in the D90A patients, might be secondary to sparing, or relative sparing, of the inhibitory interneurons in the D90A mutation. Various cortical and spinal inhibitory phenomena responsible for the suppression phase that normally follows the primary peak have been revealed through cortical magnetic stimulation (Di Lazzaro et al., 1998
; Gerloff et al., 1998
; Pauvert et al., 1998
). The inhibitory activity preceding the delayed primary peak in the D90A mutation was not seen in non-hereditary ALS patients. The onset of this suppression phase seems to occur at the expected onset latency of a normal primary peak. This may suggest that corticospinal activity in D90A patients is normal but exerts an abnormal inhibitory effect on spinal motor neurons. However, the estimated onset of the suppression phase (sum of mean onset latency plus mean duration of the primary peak) was 22.8 ms in controls, which almost equals the onset of the prominent suppression phase (22.1 ms) preceding the delayed primary peaks in the D90A patients. This favours the concept that cortical and possibly spinal inhibitory mechanisms are relatively intact in this mutation and that the excitation mediated through the fast monosynaptic corticomotoneuronal pathway is lost.
We and others have proposed that ALS results from selective vulnerability of the most recent phylogenetic system to develop in the nervous system, that is, the corticomotoneuronal system (Kiernan and Hudson, 1991
; Eisen et al., 1992
; Kimura and Kaji, 1997
). This would imply selective vulnerability of the most recently expressed genes to environmental factors (Kimura and Kaji, 1997
). The cell bodies of the slower conducting axons are considerably smaller than the large cell bodies of the fast corticomotoneuronal fibres. The metabolic demands of the smaller neurons are less, making them more resistant to the complex biochemical series of events that result in the demise of the corticomotoneurons and anterior horn cells. It is reasonable to speculate that in cases with the D90A mutation, additional resistance has been conferred on the small diameter corticomotoneurons through the interaction of a protective modifier acting on the inhibitory interneurons.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Al-Chalabi A, Andersen PM, Chioza B, Shaw C, Sham PC, Robberecht W, et al. Recessive amyotrophic lateral sclerosis families with the D90A SOD1 mutation share a common founder: evidence for a linked protective factor. Hum Mol Genet 1998; 7: 204550.
Andersen PM, Nilsson P, Ala-Hurula V, Keränen M-L, Tarvainen I, Haltia T, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with homozygosity for an Asp90Ala mutation in CuZn-superoxide dismutase. Nat Genet 1995; 10: 616.[Web of Science][Medline]
Andersen PM, Forsgren L, Binzer M, Nilsson P, Ala-Hurula V, Keränen M-L, et al. Autosomal recessive adult-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with homozygosity for Asp90Ala CuZn-superoxide dismutase mutation. A clinical and genealogical study of 36 patients. Brain 1996; 119: 115372.
Andersen PM. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and CuZn-superoxide dismutase [doctoral thesis]. Umeå University: Umeå University Press; 1997.
Andersen PM, Nilsson P, Keranen ML, Forsgren L, Hagglund J, Karlsborg M, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity in motor neuron disease patients with CuZn-superoxide dismutase mutations in Scandinavia. Brain 1997; 120: 172337.
Ashby P, Zilm D. Relationship between EPSP shape and cross-correlation profile explored by computer simulation for studies on human motoneurons. Exp Brain Res 1982; 47: 3340.[Web of Science][Medline]
Awiszus F, Feistner H. Abnormal EPSPs evoked by magnetic brain stimulation in hand muscle motoneurons of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 89: 40814.[Web of Science][Medline]
Awiszus F, Feistner H. Comparison of single motor unit responses to transcranial magnetic and peroneal nerve stimulation in the tibialis anterior muscle of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 97: 905.[Medline]
Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Cruccu G, Mercuri B, Manfredi M. Electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation in patients with corticospinal damage due to stroke or motor neurone disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 81: 38996.[Web of Science][Medline]
Boniface SJ, Mills KR, Schubert M. Responses of single spinal motoneurons to magnetic brain stimulation in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain 1991; 114: 64362.
Brooks BR. El Escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 1994; 124 Suppl: 96107.
Brouwer B, Ashby P. Corticospinal projections to upper and lower limb spinal motoneurons in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 76: 50919.[Web of Science][Medline]
Caramia MD, Cicinelli P, Paradiso C, Mariorenzi R, Zarola F, Bernardi G, et al. `Excitability' changes of muscular responses to magnetic brain stimulation in patients with central motor disorders. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 81: 24350.
Day BL, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Dick JP, Cowan JM, Berardelli A, et al. Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. II. Multiple descending volleys. Brain 1987; 110: 1191209.
Day BL, Dressler D, Maertens de Noordhout A, Marsden CD, Nakashima K, Rothwell JC, et al. Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J Physiol (Lond) 1989; 412: 44973.
de Noordhout AM, Rapisarda G, Bogacz D, Gerard P, De Pasqua V, Pennisi G, et al. Corticomotoneuronal synaptic connections in normal man. Brain 1999; 122: 132740.
Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Oliviero A, Profice P, Ferrara L, Insola A, et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits. Exp Brain Res 1998; 119: 2658.[Web of Science][Medline]
Disiato MT, Caramia MD. Towards a neurophysiological marker of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as revealed by changes in cortical excitability. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 105: 17.[Medline]
Eisen A, Krieger C. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a synthesis of research and clinical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Eisen A, Shytbel W, Murphy K, Hoirch M. Cortical magnetic stimulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 1990; 13: 14651.[Web of Science][Medline]
Eisen A, Kim S, Pant B. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): a phylogenetic disease of the corticomotoneuron? [Review]. Muscle Nerve 1992; 15: 21924.[Web of Science][Medline]
Eisen A, Pant B, Stewart H. Cortical excitability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clue to pathogenesis. Can J Neurol Sci 1993; 20: 116.[Web of Science][Medline]
Eisen A, Entezari-Taher M, Stewart H. Cortical projections to spinal motoneurons: changes with aging and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 1996; 46: 1396404.
Ellaway PH. Cumulative sum technique and its application to the analysis of peristimulus time histograms. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 45: 3024.[Web of Science][Medline]
Fetz EE, Gustafsson B. Relation between shapes of post-synaptic potentials and changes in firing probability of cat motoneurones. J Physiol (Lond) 1983; 341: 387410.
Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NM, Schriefer TN. Magnetic brain stimulation: central motor conduction studies in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1987; 22: 74452.[Web of Science][Medline]
Gerloff C, Cohen LG, Floeter MK, Chen R, Corwell B, Hallett M. Inhibitory influence of the ipsilateral motor cortex on responses to stimulation of the human cortex and pyramidal tract. J Physiol (Lond) 1998; 510: 24959.
Ince PG, Tomkins J, Slade JY, Thatcher NM, Shaw PJ. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with genetic abnormalities in the gene encoding Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase: molecular pathology of five new cases, and comparison with previous reports and 73 sporadic cases of ALS. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1998; 57: 895904.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ingram DA, Swash M. Central motor conduction is abnormal in motor neuron disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 15966.
Ingram DA, Thompson AJ, Swash M. Central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis: evaluation of abnormalities revealed by transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51: 48794.
Kernell D, Wu C-P. Responses of the pyramidal tract to stimulation of the baboon's motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1967; 191: 65372.
Kiernan JA, Hudson AJ. Changes in sizes of cortical and lower motor neurons in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 1991; 114: 84353.
Kimura J, Kaji R. Physiology of ALS and related diseases. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1997. p. VVIII.
Kohara N, Kaji R, Kojima Y, Mills KR, Fujii H, Hamano T, et al. Abnormal excitability of the corticospinal pathway in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a single motor unit study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 101: 3241.[Medline]
Kohara N, Kaji R, Kojima Y, Kimura J. An electrophysiological study of the corticospinal projections in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 110: 112332.[Web of Science][Medline]
Lemon RN, Werner W, Bennett KMB, Flament DA. The proportion of slow and fast pyramidal tract neurones producing post-spike facilitation of hand muscles in the conscious monkey. J Physiol (Lond) 1993; 459: 166P.
Mayr N, Baumgartner C, Zeitlhofer J, Deecke L. The sensitivity of transcranial cortical magnetic stimulation in detecting pyramidal tract lesions in clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1991; 41: 5669.
Mills KR. Motor neuron disease: studies of the corticospinal excitation of single motor neurons by magnetic brain stimulation. Brain 1995; 118: 97182.
Mills KR. Corticomotoneuronal PSTH studies [editorial]. [Review]. Muscle Nerve 1999; 22: 2978.[Web of Science][Medline]
Mills KR, Nithi KA. Corticomotor threshold is reduced in early sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20: 113741.[Web of Science][Medline]
Nakajima M, Eisen A, McCarthy R, Olney RK, Aminoff MJ. Reduced corticomotoneuronal excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) with normal Ia afferent EPSPs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 1996; 47: 155561.
Nakajima M, Eisen A, Stewart H. Diverse abnormalities of corticomotoneuronal projections in individual patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 105: 4517.[Medline]
Nakamura H, Kitagawa H, Kawaguchi Y, Tsuji H. Intracortical facilitation and inhibition after transcranial magnetic stimulation in conscious humans. J Physiol (Lond) 1997; 489: 81723.
Nihei K, McKee AC, Kowall NW. Patterns of neuronal degeneration in the motor cortex of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1993; 86: 5564.[Medline]
Palmar E, Ashby P. Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans. J Physiol (Lond) 1992; 448: 397412.
Pauvert V, Pierrot-Deseilligny E, Rothwell JC. Role of spinal premotoneurones in mediating corticospinal input to forearm motoneurones in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1998; 508: 30112.
Penco S, Schenone A, Bordo D, Bolognesi M, Abbruzzese M, Bugiani O, et al. A SOD1 gene mutation in a patient with slowly progressing familial ALS. Neurology 1999; 53: 4046.
Porter R, Lemon R. Corticospinal function and voluntary movement. Monographs of the Physiological Society, No. 45. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1993. p. 122209.
Pringle CE, Hudson AJ, Munoz DG, Kiernan JA, Brown WF, Ebers GC. Primary lateral sclerosis. Clinical features, neuropathology and diagnostic criteria. Brain 1992; 115: 495520.
Prout AJ, Eisen AA. The cortical silent period and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 1994; 17: 21723.[Web of Science][Medline]
Radunovic A, Leigh PN. Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: correlation between genotype and clinical features. [Review]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996; 61: 56572.
Ravnborg M, Liguori R, Christiansen P, Larsson H, Sørensen P-S. The diagnostic reliability of magnetically evoked motor potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1992; 42: 1296301.
Robberecht W, Aguirre T, Van den Bosch L, Tilkin P, Cassiman JJ, Matthijs G. D90A heterozygosity in the SOD1 gene is associated with familial and apparently sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 1996; 47: 13369.
Rosen DR, Siddique T, Patterson D, Figlewicz DA, Sapp P, Hentati A, et al. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature 1993; 362: 5962.[Medline]
Rossini PM. The anatomic and physiologic bases of motor-evoked potentials. [Review]. Neurol Clin 1988; 6: 75169.[Web of Science][Medline]
Rossini PM, Zarola F, Floris R, Bernardi G, Perretti A, Pelosi L, et al. Sensory (VEP, BAEP, SEP) and motor-evoked potentials, liquoral and magnetic resonance findings in multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol 1989; 29: 417.[Web of Science][Medline]
Salerno A, Carlander B, Camu W, Georgesco M. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs): evaluation of the different types of responses in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 36: 3618.[Medline]
Schriefer TN, Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NM. Central motor conduction studies in motor neurone disease using magnetic brain stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 74: 4317.[Web of Science][Medline]
Takahashi K. Slow and fast groups of pyramidal tract cells and their respective membrane properties. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28: 90824.
Thompson PD, Day BL, Rothwell JC, Dick JP, Cowan JM, Asselman P, et al. The interpretation of electromyographic responses to electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in diseases of the upper motor neurone. J Neurol Sci 1987; 80: 91110.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ugawa Y, Kanazawa I. Motor-evoked potentials: unusual findings. Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 110: 16415.[Web of Science][Medline]
Weber M, Eisen A. Assessment of upper and lower motor neurons in Kennedy's disease: Implications for corticomotoneuronal PSTH studies. Muscle Nerve 1999; 22: 299306.[Web of Science][Medline]
Weber M, Eisen A, Nakajima M. Corticomotoneuronal activity in ALS: changes in the peristimulus time histogram over time. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111: 16977.[Web of Science][Medline]
Received October 8, 1999. Revised January 20, 2000. Accepted February 14, 2000.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Vucic, G. A. Nicholson, and M. C. Kiernan Cortical hyperexcitability may precede the onset of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Brain, June 1, 2008; 131(6): 1540 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M R Turner, A D Osei-Lah, A Hammers, A Al-Chalabi, C E Shaw, P M Andersen, D J Brooks, P N Leigh, and K R Mills Abnormal cortical excitability in sporadic but not homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2005; 76(9): 1279 - 1285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Turner, A. Hammers, A. Al-Chalabi, C. E. Shaw, P. M. Andersen, D. J. Brooks, and P. N. Leigh Distinct cerebral lesions in sporadic and 'D90A' SOD1 ALS: studies with [11C]flumazenil PET Brain, June 1, 2005; 128(6): 1323 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Turner, E. A. Rabiner, A. Hammers, A. Al-Chalabi, P. M. Grasby, C. E. Shaw, D. J. Brooks, and P. N. Leigh [11C]-WAY100635 PET demonstrates marked 5-HT1A receptor changes in sporadic ALS Brain, April 1, 2005; 128(4): 896 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



27 ms or
31ms. The vast majority of primary peaks in non-heriditary ALS have a normal or only slightly prolonged onset latency.
