Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayo, I.
Right arrow Articles by Castaño, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayo, I.
Right arrow Articles by Castaño, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 125, No. 12, 2658-2667, December 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

The proteasome is a major autoantigen in multiple sclerosis

Isabel Mayo1, Joaquín Arribas1,4, Pablo Villoslada3,5, Rita Alvarez DoForno2, Susana Rodríguez-Vilariño1, Xavier Montalban3, María Rosa de Sagarra1 and José G. Castaño1

1 Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas ‘Alberto Sols’, UAM-CSIC, Facultad de Medicina, UAM, 2 Servicio de Inmunología, Hospital Universitario ‘La Paz’, Madrid and 3 Unitat de Neuroinmunología Clínica. Hospital Vall d‘Hebron, Barcelona, Spain 4 Present addresses: Laboratori de Recerca Oncologica, Unitat B, Hospital Vall d‘Hebron, Barcelona and 5 Departmento de Neurología, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

Correspondence to: J. G. Castaño, Departamento de Bioquímica e Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas ‘Alberto Sols’, UAM-CSIC, Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain E-mail: joseg.castano{at}uam.es

Received February 12, 2002. Revised June 17, 2002. Accepted June 22, 2002.


    Summary
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Multiple sclerosis seems to be an autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology affecting the white matter of the CNS. It is generally accepted that the autoimmune response is directed against specific components of myelin. We show here that proteasome, a ubiquitous protease complex composed of 14 different subunits, is a target for autoantibodies (IgG and IgM classes) present in the serum (66%, 73 out of 110) and in the CSF (61%, 16 out of 26) of patients with multiple sclerosis. Using recombinant proteasomal subunits we demonstrate the presence of specific autoantibodies against subunits C2, C8, C9 and C5 in multiple sclerosis patients. Recombinant C2 constructs allow us to localize an immunodominant autoepitope recognized by the sera of multiple sclerosis patients within the C-terminal of C2 proteasomal subunit (251-DEPAEKADEPMEH-263). In addition, two constructs of the recombinant proteasomal subunits C2 and C8 were also used to study the proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from multiple sclerosis patients; 12 out of 30 (40%) multiple sclerosis patients show positive proliferation with one or both of these recombinant subunits. The high prevalence of anti-proteasome autoantibodies in multiple sclerosis sera compared with sera from patients with other chronic inflammatory conditions: systemic lupus erythematosus (35%, 35 out of 100), primary Sjogren’s syndrome (16%, 5 out of 31), vasculitis (0 out of 20), sarcoidosis (7%, 1 out of 13) and Behcet’s disease (19%, 4 out of 21) suggest that humoral autoreactivity to proteasome could be a useful test in multiple sclerosis patients that may be of help in the diagnosis and/or progression of this chronic inflammatory disease. Finally, these results suggest that some global abnormality in B and/or T cell function is also involved in the chronic inflammatory response observed in multiple sclerosis patients, as it is frequently observed in other human organ-specific autoimmune diseases.

Keywords: human autoantibodies; antigen epitopes; demyelinating diseases; cell-mediated autoimmunity

Abbreviations: GST= glutathione S-transferase; Ig = immunoglobulin; MBP = myelin basic protein; MCP = multicatalytic proteinase, proteosome; MOG = myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; PBMC = peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PP = primary progressive; R/R = relapsing/remitting; SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus; SI = stimulation index; SP = secondary progressive; SDS–PAGE = sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis


    Introduction
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory disease of the CNS characterized by perivascular inflammation and demyelination in the white matter (Steinman, 1996Go; Noseworthy, 1999Go; Noseworthy et al., 2000Go). The presence of immunoglobulin deposits, macrophages, B and T cells in the lesions argues that demyelination is due to an immune response elicited by environmental factors in genetically predisposed individuals and perpetuated by an autoimmune mechanism (Steinman 1996Go; Noseworthy, 1999Go; Noseworthy et al., 2000Go).

The antigens driving the autoimmune response in multiple sclerosis are still not clear. In this context, myelin proteins have been studied as potential targets of autoimmune reactivity in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. The importance of myelin-derived antigens [major constituents: myelin basic protein (MBP) and proteolipid protein; minor constituents: myelin associated glycoprotein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)] have been demonstrated by their abilities to produce experimental allergic encephalomyelitis, a multiple sclerosis-like disease in various animal models (Steinman, 1999Go; Wong et al., 1999Go). In multiple sclerosis, response to these myelin antigens has been described and is probably implicated in the progression of the disease, but T-cell response to MBP, proteolipid protein and MOG can be found with similar frequencies in healthy subjects and in patients with multiple sclerosis (Warren et al., 1995Go; Wucherpfennig et al., 1997Go; Diaz-Villoslada et al., 1999Go).

Humoral response in multiple sclerosis patients, apart from its role in mediating demyelination (Steinman, 1996Go; Noseworthy, 1999Go; Noseworthy et al., 2000Go; Lassmann et al., 2001Go), provides a scientific rationale for the study of the T-cell response in multiple sclerosis patients. The presence of circulating autoantibodies against MBP in multiple sclerosis patients is rather controversial (Colombo et al., 1997Go), but they can be eluted from brain demyelinating lesions (Warren et al., 1995Go; Wucherpfennig et al., 1997Go). Antibody and T-cell mediated immune response against oligodendrocyte transaldolase (Banki et al., 1994Go; Colombo et al., 1997Go; Esposito et al., 1999Go) and against {alpha} B-crystallin (van Noort et al., 1995Go; Agius et al., 1999Go) have been described in multiple sclerosis patients. 2'-3'-Cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase, a protein present in myelin membranes, has also been described as a target of the humoral response in multiple sclerosis patients (Walsh and Murray, 1998Go). Nevertheless, the clinical utility of these autoantibodies remains to be fully established.

The proteasome is a 20S complex responsible for most non-lysosomal protein degradation in eukaryotes; structural homologues have been described in archaeons and eubacteria (Coux et al., 1996Go; Bochtler et al., 1999Go). The overall structure of the proteasome is a hollow cylinder composed of four heptameric rings in the configuration {alpha}7ß7ß7{alpha}7. In eukaryotes, the proteasome is composed of seven different {alpha} and seven different ß subunits (Groll et al., 1997Go; Bochtler et al., 1999Go). In vertebrates, the three active proteasome ß-type subunits can be replaced by {alpha}-interferon-inducible subunits which improve the surface expression of major histo-compatibility complex class I-bound antigenic peptides and presentation (York et al., 1999Go). The first evidence that proteasomes are involved in autoimmune diseases was our report that sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) contain specific autoantibodies directed against different polypeptide components of the proteasome (Arribas et al., 1991Go). This finding was later confirmed by other authors (Feist et al., 1996Go). Autoantibodies against proteasomes have also been reported to be present in the sera of patients with polymyositis–myositis and primary Sjogren’s syndrome (Feist et al., 1996Go, 1999). Subsequent work from our group demonstrated that proteasome autoantibodies are not present in several autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, scleroderma, autoimmune thyroid diseases, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis (Mayo et al., 2000Go). The present study demonstrates that proteasome is a major autoantigen for humoral and cell mediated response in multiple sclerosis patients.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Human sera
Patients included 102 with multiple sclerosis that were under no treatment prior to blood or CSF collection. All patients satisfied the criteria of definitive diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and were classified under three categories: relapsing/remitting (R/R), secondary progressive (SP) and primary progressive (PP) following established clinical consensus (Lublin and Reingold, 1996Go). Sera from 100 healthy subjects and 40 patients with other neurological diseases were used as controls. The disease diagnosis for patients with other neurological diseases was: four with cerebellar ataxia; five with CNS neoplasm; five with myasthenia gravis; six with cerebrovascular disease; five with peripheral neuropathies; two with viral meningitis; three with polyneuropathy; and 10 with Guillain–Barré syndrome.

The anti-proteasome autoreactivity was also studied in sera of patients with other autoimmune diseases or conditions that resembled multiple sclerosis (Trojano and Paolicelli, 2001Go) including: 31 patients with primary Sjogren’s syndrome; 21 patients with Behcet’s disease; and 13 patients with sarcoidosis.

We have also studied CSF and sera from patients with multiple sclerosis kindly provided by Dr W. W. Tourtelotte from the National Neurological Specimen Bank, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA (patient identification numbers: 7845, 7848, 6985, 10550, 8782, 9603, 8951 and 8691). The current investigation was approved by the Ethical Committees of the participating hospitals according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Purification of proteasome and recombinant proteasomal subunits
Purified rat liver and human erythrocyte proteasome complexes were obtained as previously described (Arribas and Castaño, 1990Go; Ruiz de Mena et al., 1993Go). Purified recombinant subunits C2, C5, C8 and C9 were obtained as previously described (Arribas et al., 1994Go; Castaño et al., 1996Go; Rodriguez-Vilariño et al., 2000Go). The C2 constructs used for epitope mapping have also been described (Arribas et al., 1994Go). The GST-C2 C-terminal construct was obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the coding sequence for the last 16 amino acids of the human C2 subunit (QAADEPAEKADEPMEH) and subcloning into the pGEX-4T1 vector (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). Glutathione S-transferase (GST) and GST-C2 C-terminal proteins were affinity-purified using glutathione–Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). EClpP was purified as described previously (Arribas and Castaño, 1993Go). The recombinant proteins used for proliferation assays were dialysed and concentrated against sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using Centrikon 30 (Milipore, Bedford, MA, USA).

Western immunoblot analysis
Purified proteasome complex (1–2 µg) or the indicated recombinant proteasomal subunit (1 µg) was separated on 14% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) as previously described (Arribas et al., 1991Go). Gels were either stained with Coomassie blue or transferred to nitrocellulose for immunoblotting. Nitrocellulose strips were blocked with blocking buffer TTBS (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for immunoblot analysis. The strips were incubated for 3 h at room temperature with sera or CSF from human subjects (unless otherwise indicated) at 1/100 or 1/20 dilution, respectively (Arribas et al., 1991Go). The blots were developed with alkaline phosphatase labelled goat anti-human antibodies (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 1/1000 or a mix of anti-immunoglobulin (Ig) IgA, IgM and IgG (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) at 1/5000 dilution as previously described (Arribas et al., 1994Go). The Ig subclass was defined by developing immunoblots with alkaline phosphatase labelled antibodies against human IgA, IgM and IgG at 1/5000 dilution.

Proliferation assays
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were incubated in 200 µl serum-free AIM-V medium (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) at 37°C in humidified air containing 5% CO2 at a density of 105 cells/well in 96 well round bottom tissue culture plates (Diaz-Villoslada et al., 1999Go). The following reagents were added to triplicate wells: control, no addition; phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) (Sigma Chemical Co., MO, USA) 1 µg/ml; GST-C2 C-terminal (antigen) 10/25 µg/ml, C8 (antigen) 10/25 µg/ml, GST (control) 10/25 µg/ml, EClpP (control) 10/25 µg/ml, MCP 2 µg/ml and recombinant rat MOG 10 µg/ml.

The recombinant proteins were purified from DH5{alpha} Escherichia coli (GST-C2Ct and GST) or from BL-21 E.coli (C8, MOG and EClpP) (Castaño et al., 1996Go). After 2 days, 0.5 µCi/well 3H thymidine (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) was added. Cultures were harvested 18 h later and c.p.m. determined using a Beckman scintillation counter (Beckman-Coulter Inc., Fullerstone, CA, USA). Stimulation indices (SI) were calculated as the ratio of c.p.m. in the presence of antigen to c.p.m. in the absence of antigen (control). Positive proliferative responses were arbitrarily defined as SI values >=2.0, which was 4SD above the mean of the control. The optimal concentrations of antigens for proliferation assays used in this study were established in preliminary experiments using a range of 2–50 µg/ml for each antigen. No significant proliferation (SI<2) was found for the proteasome antigens and control proteins with samples from 10 healthy subjects and from 10 patients with multiple sclerosis unrelated diseases (clinical diagnoses: two with cerebellar ataxia; three with cephalea; three with peripheral polyneuropathy; and two with cerebrovascular disease).

Statistical analysis
A crosstab analysis was used ({chi}2 test) to evaluate intergroup differences in the percentage of positives (reactivity against antigens with SI >2.0). Results are presented as mean ± SD. All statistical analyses utilized SPSS 9.0 software (SPSS Science, Chicago, IL, USA).


    Results
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Detection of anti-proteasome antibodies in sera and CSF of multiple sclerosis patients
We analysed sera from 102 multiple sclerosis patients and 100 healthy subjects by western immunoblotting with purified proteasome (1–2 µg); seropositivity was based on immunoreactivity with one or several proteasome polypeptides at serum dilutions of 1/100 or higher. Sixty-five sera from multiple sclerosis patients were positive and representative results are shown in Fig. 1 with titres 1/200–1/2000. Similar results were obtained with purified human erythrocyte proteasome (data not shown). No anti-proteasome seropositivity (serum dilutions 1/20–1/50) was detected in the sera of healthy subjects (n = 100) nor of patients with other neurological diseases (n = 40, see Material and methods for diagnosis). To demonstrate specificity, human antibodies were affinity-purified from proteasomes and tested by immunoblotting with total tissue extracts (Arribas et al., 1991Go); polypeptides with similar mass were detected in samples of purified proteasome and in total brain or liver extracts (data not shown). These results indicate that the proteasome immunoreactivity of multiple sclerosis sera is specific and not due to cross-reacting antibodies.



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Representative immunoblot analysis of sera from multiple sclerosis patients against proteasome. Purified rat liver proteasome was loaded in a continuous 14% SDS–PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose and cut into strips. Strips were either stained for MCP or processed for immunoblot analysis with sera from multiple sclerosis patients [lanes 1–8 (dilution 1/200) and control serum, lane C (dilution 1/20)].

 
The majority of patients with multiple sclerosis have R/R multiple sclerosis but, in more that 50% of these patients, it eventually becomes SP multiple sclerosis. A minority, ~10% patients, have PP multiple sclerosis (Lublin and Reingold, 1996Go). Seropositivity against proteasome was found in 58% (34 out of 59) of patients with R/R multiple sclerosis, in 81% with SP multiple sclerosis (25 out of 31) and in 50% (6 out of 12) with PP multiple sclerosis. As a consequence, the presence of anti-proteasome antibodies is not restricted to a particular group of multiple sclerosis patients. To determine fluctuations in proteasome immunoreactivity, sera from 14 positive and 10 negative multiple sclerosis patients were tested on two to six different occasions, 6 months to 5 years apart. Sequential immunoblot analysis showed that the autoantibody titre did not change significantly (data not shown).

CSF samples from multiple sclerosis patients were also analysed for the presence of anti-proteasome antibodies. CSF from seronegative multiple sclerosis patients (n = 6) and from controls (n = 10) were negative at a 1/5 dilution (data not shown). In contrast, 66.7% (8 out of 12) CSF samples from seropositive multiple sclerosis patients were positive at 1/20 dilution (titre 1/40–1/200). In addition, 100% (8 out of 8) sera and their matched CSF samples from the National Neurological Research Bank (USA) were also positive. Fig. 2 shows the results obtained for one of these patients (10550); both serum and CSF of this patient contain antibodies to almost all the polypeptide components of the proteasome (similar to Patient 8 in Fig. 1). Fig. 2 also illustrates a common feature of proteasome autoreactivity of samples from multiple sclerosis patients—the concurrent presence of autoantibodies against different proteasomal subunits, albeit with substantially different titres. In general, the titre of proteasome antibodies was 5–10-fold lower in the CSF than in the serum of the same patient. Nevertheless, the concentration of proteasome antibodies based on the total Ig content was enriched at least 50-fold in the CSF.



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Immunoblot analysis of serum and CSF of multiple sclerosis patient 10550 at different dilutions. Purified proteasome (MCP stained) was probed by immunoblot with serum (at two dilutions, 1/100 and 1/1000) and CSF (dilutions 1/20 to 1/160) as indicated.

 
SLE, Sjogren’s syndrome, vasculitis, Behcet’s disease and sarcoidosis may have clinical manifestations that can sometimes lead to misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis patients. Therefore, it was interesting to study the seroreactivity to proteasome in these patients. We have already reported the presence of anti-proteasome seroreactivity in SLE patients (35 out of 100) (Arribas et al., 1991Go) and its absence in the sera of patients with vasculitis (0 out of 20) (Mayo et al., 2000Go). With respect to the other inflammatory conditions, we found seropositivity against proteasome in 16% (5 out of 31) of sera from patients with primary Sjogren’s syndrome (titre 1/100–1/200), in 19% (4 out of 21) of sera from patients with Behcet’s disease (titre 1/100–1/200) and in 7% (1 out of 13) of sera from patients with sarcoidosis (titre 1/200) with recognition of several polypeptide components of the proteasome complex (data not shown). These results clearly indicate that the prevalence of anti-proteasome seroreactivity in multiple sclerosis is significantly higher than in the other inflammatory conditions tested, even when compared with SLE patients (35%, n = 100) ({chi}2 = 21.05, P < 0.001).

Autoantibodies to proteasome in multiple sclerosis are predominantly IgM and IgG in serum and CSF
To determine the Ig class of anti-proteasome response, we analysed matched serum and CSF samples from multiple sclerosis patients with secondary antibodies specific for human IgA, IgG or IgM; representative results are shown in Fig. 3. The predominant response to proteasome was IgM and/or IgG for both serum and CSF in all the patients studied (n = 15). Note that for a given patient (Fig. 3), some polypeptides of the proteasome are predominantly recognized by IgM immunoreactivity while others by IgG immunoreactivity. Only one patient serum out of 30 sera analysed for immunoglobulin class shows a predominance of IgA anti-proteasome reactivity (data not shown).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Immunoglobulin class of anti-proteasome antibodies of matched serum and CSF samples from multiple sclerosis patients. Serum (dilution 1/400) and CSF (dilution 1/40) from the multiple sclerosis patients indicated were probed against purified proteasome (stained MCP). Developing was performed with alkaline phosphatase labelled anti-human IgA (lanes 1, 4 and 7), IgG (lanes 2, 5 and 8) and IgM (lanes 3, 6 and 9).

 
The following facts suggest that the autoimmune response in multiple sclerosis patients is oligo or polyclonal:

(i) The presence in sera and CSF of multiple sclerosis patients of IgM and IgG antibodies against several proteasomal subunits with different titres.

(ii) The concordance of Ig class of anti-proteasome antibodies between CSF and serum.

(iii) The oligomeric structure of the proteasome.

It is noteworthy that the immunoglobulin subclass of positive anti-proteasome sera from patients with SLE (n = 10), Sjogren’s syndrome (n = 5), Behcet’s disease (n = 6) and sarcoidosis (n = 1) were also mainly IgM and IgG (data not shown).

Detection of autoantibodies against proteasome with recombinant subunits
Eukaryotic proteasomes are composed of seven different {alpha} and seven different ß subunits. As illustrated in Fig. 1 (Patient 8) and Fig. 2 (Patient 10550), some multiple sclerosis sera have antibodies against the whole set of proteasomal subunits, while other multiple sclerosis sera have antibodies to some but not all of the proteasomal subunits (Figs 1 and 3). The identification of the reactive subunits by simple SDS–PAGE is difficult and by two-dimensional analysis is time-consuming and may require micro-sequencing. Characteriza tion of reactivities by the use of recombinant proteins is a general approach to the study of autoimmune diseases. To this end, recombinant C2, C8, C9 and C5 proteasomal subunits were used as substrates in immunoblotting with sera from multiple sclerosis patients. Sera of Patient 2 (Fig. 1) and Patient 15 (not shown) recognize proteasomal polypeptides of 32 and 28 kDa. Fig. 4 shows that Patient 2 serum has antibodies against the C2 (32 kDa) and both the C8 and C9 (co-migrating at 28 kDa) proteasomal subunits (Fig. 4), while Patient 15 contains antibodies to the C2 and C9 proteasomal subunits, but none to subunit C8 (Fig. 4). Serum of patient 5 reacted with a 28 kDa proteasome polypeptide (Fig. 1) and contains antibodies to subunits C8 and C9 (Fig. 4). Serum of Patient 6, recognizing a 23 kDa proteasome polypeptide (Fig. 1), contains antibodies against the ß C5 subunit (Fig. 4).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Recombinant proteasomal subunits can be used for detection of proteasome seroreactivity in multiple sclerosis patients. Recombinant purified {alpha}- (C2, C8, C9) and ß- (C5) type proteasomal subunits were resolved by 14% SDS–PAGE and either stained (as indicated) or immunoblotted with sera of different multiple sclerosis patients (labelled Iblot). Iblot 2 corresponds to serum of Patient 2 shown in Fig. 1. Iblot 15 corresponds to serum of a patient that shows against whole proteasome—a pattern identical to Patient 2. Iblot 5 corresponds to serum of Patient 5 shown in Fig. 1. Iblot 6 corresponds to serum of Patient 6 shown in Fig. 1.

 
These results demonstrate that recombinant proteasomal subunits produced in bacteria can be used to detect and characterize the antibody repertoire of multiple sclerosis patients and that the main epitopes recognized by these autoantibodies are present in the primary sequence of the proteasomal subunits. At present, we have not found any correlation between the pattern of reactivity to individual proteasomal subunits and either disease type or duration.

Epitope mapping of anti-C2 antibodies from multiple sclerosis patient sera
Another advantage of recombinant antigens is their use for epitope mapping. Using a full-length recombinant C2 subunit, seropositivity against C2 by immunoblotting was found in 14 out of 32 proteasome-seropositive multiple sclerosis patients (at 1/100 dilution). To define the regions of proteasomal subunit C2 targeted by the C2 autoantibodies present in sera of multiple sclerosis patients, deletion constructs of full-length C2 cDNA were used. Representative results from four of these C2-seropositive multiple sclerosis patients are shown in Fig. 5. Sera of multiple sclerosis patients recognize the C2 subunit present in the proteasome complex and the full-length recombinant subunit C2 (Fig. 5, lanes 1 and 2). A C-terminal deletion construct, mC2.24, that eliminates the last 13 amino acids (Fig. 5, lane 3) is not recognized by the antibodies present in the sera of multiple sclerosis patients. Extended deletions from the C-terminal (protein constructs mC2 23 and 22; Fig. 5 lanes 4 and 5) are also not recognized by the multiple sclerosis patient sera. Restoration into a truncated form of the C2 subunit (construct mC2.23) of the DNA encoding the C-terminal of subunit C2 by in-frame ligation (construct mC2.26) restores recognition by sera of multiple sclerosis patients (Fig. 5, lane 6). Furthermore, a fusion protein of GST and the last 13 amino acids of the C2 C-terminal is also recognized by the multiple sclerosis sera (data not shown). Similar results were obtained with 10 different sera from multiple sclerosis patients that were seropositive to the C2 subunit. These results clearly demonstrate that the last 13 amino acids of the C-terminal of subunit C2 (DEPAEKADEPMEH) is a major epitope targeted by multiple sclerosis autoantibodies in the C2 subunit.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Epitope mapping of anti-C2 autoantibodies present in serum of multiple sclerosis patients. Panel S shows 16% SDS–PAGE stained with Coomassie blue of the purified proteasome (lanes 1) and recombinant proteins 2–6 used for epitope mapping. Other panels are immunoblots of the corresponding proteins with serum of multiple sclerosis patients whose numbers are indicated at the top. A schematic drawing of the different C2 protein constructs used for epitope mapping is also shown, together with the amino acid sequence of the main C2 epitope recognized by multiple sclerosis patient sera.

 
Proliferation of PBMC with proteasomal antigens
To investigate whether proteasome may be a target of autoreactive T-cells, its effect on the proliferation of PBMC was evaluated. Highly purified recombinant fusion GST-C2 C-terminal (containing the main epitope recognized by multiple sclerosis autoantibodies against C2) and C8 proteasomal subunit proteins, whole proteasome and MOG were used in these studies. We have arbitrarily taken an SI >=2 as positive proliferative response (see Material and methods). Fig. 6 shows a plot of the SI of individual samples versus the different proteins used in the proliferation assays. Proliferative response to phytohaemagglutinin was observed in all the samples studied (Fig. 6). We also observed positive proliferation with MOG (P = 0.022 with respect to controls), a known T-antigen for PBMC from multiple sclerosis patients (Fig. 6). With proteasomal antigens, we observed a modest, but clearly significant, proliferative response. The percent of positive proliferative response by intergroup analysis was significantly higher with GST-C2 C-terminal (GST C2b) 25 µg/ml (P = 0.02), C8 (C8b) 25 µg/ml (P = 0.001) and proteasome (P = 0.018) when compared with controls (Fig. 6). Table 1 summarizes the clinical data and antibody response for the multiple sclerosis patients analysed in proliferation assays. From a total of 30 multiple sclerosis patients, 40% (12) show an SI>=2 using the fusion protein GST-C2 C-terminal and/or the recombinant C8 subunit. It is also noteworthy, that 100% (8 out of 8) multiple sclerosis patients who were proteasome seronegative were also negative in proliferative assays. Proliferation of PBMC of healthy subjects was not stimulated significantly by any of the recombinant proteins (SI<2, n = 10) or purified proteasome (data not shown). These results suggest that proteasome is also an antigenic target to cell-mediated response in multiple sclerosis patients.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6 Proliferative response of PBMCs from multiple sclerosis patients to proteasomal antigens. Individual proliferative responses are shown for each of the 30 multiple sclerosis patients analysed. Phytohaemagglutinin at 1 µg/ml, MOG at 20 µg/ml, MCP (whole purified proteasome) at 2 µg/ml and GST-C2 C-terminal, C8, GST and EClpP at two doses: (a) 10 µg/ml and (b) 25 µg/ml, respectively.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Disease data of multiple sclerosis patients analysed for proliferative response to proteasomal antigens
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The overall data presented in this study (including eight patients from the USA) show a prevalence of anti-proteasome antibodies of 66% (65 + 8 out of 102 + 8 = 73 out of 110) in serum samples. With the caveat that differences could be due to geographical differences, this prevalence is higher than the prevalence reported for autoantibodies against human transaldolase (30.8%; 29 out of 94) and similar to that reported for autoantibodies against 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase (74%; 52 out of 70) in multiple sclerosis patients, respectively (Colombo et al., 1997Go; Walsh and Murray, 1998Go). Anti-proteasome antibodies were found in 80% (8 + 8 out of 12 + 8 = 16 out of 20) of CSF samples from proteasome-positive multiple sclerosis patients. This prevalence of anti-proteasome antibodies in CSF is similar to the one reported for autoantibodies against transaldolase (Colombo et al., 1997Go) in CSF samples from transaldolase-seropositive multiple sclerosis patients (76.4%, 13 out of 17). The prevalence of proteasome-seropositivity with respect to the clinical form of multiple sclerosis [58% in R/R multiple sclerosis (n = 59), 50% in PP multiple sclerosis (n = 12) and 80% in SP multiple sclerosis (n = 31)] indicates that the presence of anti-proteasome antibodies was not restricted to a particular group of multiple sclerosis patients. It is also noteworthy that 66.7% (8 out of 12) multiple sclerosis patients were seropositive at the time of their first attack (before definitive clinical diagnosis), indicating that anti-proteasome antibodies are present very early in the course of multiple sclerosis (data not shown). These results, together with unchanged titre of anti-proteasome antibodies during prolonged periods of the disease course, may indicate that autoreactivity to proteasome reflects a sensitization to the antigen and could serve as a stable marker along the course of the disease.

We have also shown that recombinant proteasomal subunits can be used to characterize the anti-proteasome repertoire of multiple sclerosis sera, demonstrating that the main epitopes recognized by these autoantibodies are present in the primary sequence of the proteasomal subunits. The use of recombinant subunits allowed us to map the epitopes of the anti-C2 antibodies present in the sera of multiple sclerosis patients, demonstrating the presence of an immunodominant B-cell epitope within the last 13 amino acids of the C-terminal of the C2 {alpha} subunit. The evidence of cell-mediated immunoreactivity to proteasomal antigens in multiple sclerosis patients was demonstrated by the specific stimulation of proliferation of PBMC with two soluble recombinant proteasomal antigens (a fusion protein of GST with the C-terminal of proteasomal subunit C2 and subunit C8). The total prevalence of positive proliferation (40%, 12 out of 30) suggests that proteasome is also a target of cell-mediated immunity in multiple sclerosis patients, while whole proteasome under these assays conditions is less effective than the recombinant proteasomal subunits probably due to its high native molecular weight (670 kDa). All the above considerations suggest that both T and B cell response against the proteasome is present in the same patient and both may contribute to the chronic inflammatory response that characterizes multiple sclerosis.

Autoantigens relevant to multiple sclerosis, as with other organ-specific autoimmune diseases (insulin dependent diabetes mellitus Type I, Graves disease and myasthenia gravis), are thought to specifically reside in myelin of the CNS—the target of the disease (Steinman, 1996Go; Noseworthy, 1999Go; Noseworthy et al., 2000Go). Here we have shown that multiple sclerosis patients present B and T cell autoreactivity against the proteasome—a ubiquitous cell antigen also present in glial and neuronal cells (Mengual et al., 1996Go). The anti-proteasome response found in multiple sclerosis is similar to that described for SLE patients (Arribas et al., 1991Go), a prototype of systemic autoimmune diseases. It is also present in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome, Behcet disease and sarcoidosis—albeit with much lower prevalence (present study). Other authors have described a higher prevalence of anti-proteasome antibodies in SLE patients (58%, 30 out of 52), polymyositis and dermatomyositis (47%, 16 out of 34) and Sjogren’s syndrome (39%, 17 out of 43) (Feist et al., 1996Go, 1999) than we found in our screening by western immunoblotting: SLE (35%, 35 out of 100); polymyositis and dermatomyositis (19%, 4 out of 21) (Arribas et al., 1991Go; Mayo et al., 2000Go); and Sjogren’s syndrome (16%, 5 out of 31) (present study). These differences could be attributed in part to the geographical origin of patients, but more likely reflect methodological differences. We have used western immunoblotting followed by development with chromogenic substrates (alkaline phosphatase), while the other authors used immunoblotting followed by detection by the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) method (Feist et al., 1996Go). Due to the higher sensitivity of the ECL method, they could detect low-affinity or low-titre anti-proteasome autoantibodies that will be negative under our assay conditions.

Intriguingly, proteasome is a shared antigenic target in multiple sclerosis and several systemic inflammatory conditions. These differences are not only from the clinical point of view, organ-specific versus systemic, but also from the point of view of the major immunological mechanism responsible for the disease—aberrant response to particular antigens versus alteration in selection, regulation or survival of T and B cells (Davidson and Diamond, 2001Go). In this context, there are some patients with SLE that present clinical features between both diseases (multiple sclerosis and SLE) that are termed ‘lupoid sclerosis’ and are actually classified as having demyelinating syndromes associated with lupus (Tola et al., 1992Go; Kovacs et al., 2000Go). Similarly patients with Sjogren’s syndrome (Fox et al., 2000Go), Behcet’s disease (Siva and Fresko, 2000Go) and sarcoidosis (Gullapalli and Phillips, 2002Go) can present involvement of the CNS and, in some cases, may lead to misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis—especially in the case of chronic sarcoidosis and CNS–neuro–Behcet syndrome.

As we have shown here, the prevalence of anti-proteasome antibodies in multiple sclerosis patients is significantly higher than in those chronic inflamatory conditions and, at present, we can not find any correlation of anti-proteasome seropositivity and neurological involvement in those chronic inflammatory diseases. The above discussion suggests that some global abnormality in B and/or T cell function is also involved in the chronic inflammatory response observed in multiple sclerosis patients, as it is frequently observed in other human organ-specific autoimmune diseases (Davidson and Diamond, 2001Go). Clearly further studies are required to understand the exact role of proteasome autoreactivity in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and other chronic inflammatory conditions, including the mechanisms involved in loss of self-tolerance to this ubiquitous antigen.

In conclusion, autoantibodies to proteasome are new markers for multiple sclerosis disease. The high prevalence and persistence of the autoreactivity to proteasome in multiple sclerosis patients compared with patients with other inflammatory conditions (SLE, Sjogren’s syndrome, vasculitis, sarcoidosis and Behcet’s disease) suggest its possible clinical utility as a new marker for the heterogenous pathogenetic components involved in this chronic inflammatory disease.


    Acknowledgements
 
We especially wish to thank Dr Francesc Graus, Servicio de Neurología Hospital Clínico, Barcelona, for providing us some of the multiple sclerosis patient sera used in this study. We also wish to thank by Dr W. W. Tourtelotte from the National Neurological Specimen Bank, Veterans Administration Medical Centre, Los Angeles, CA, USA, for providing us with materials from their multiple sclerosis bank. We also thank: Drs Francisca González and Ingebor Wichman, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla; Dr Juan Mañá, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona; Dr Isabel Illa, Hospital Santa Cruz y San Pablo, Barcelona; Drs Luis Brieva and Adrian Trejo, Lerida; and Dr María Rosa Julia, Palma de Mallorca, for providing us with serum samples used in this study. This work was supported by Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (SAF99–0056), Fundación Ramón Areces, Fundación La Caixa and CAM. I.M. was recipient of a pre-doctoral fellowship from Fundación la Caixa. S.R-V. was a recipient of a pre-doctoral fellowship from Ministerio de Educación y Cultura.


    References
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Agius MA, Kirvan CA, Schafer AL, Gudipati E, Zhu S. High prevalence of anti-alpha-crystallin antibodies in multiple sclerosis: correlation with severity and activity of disease. Acta Neurol Scand 1999; 100: 139–47.[Web of Science][Medline]

Arribas J, Castaño JG. Kinetic studies of the differential effect of detergents on the peptidase activities of the multicatalytic proteinase from rat liver. J Biol Chem 1990; 265: 13969–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arribas J, Castaño JG. A comparative study of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the rat liver multicatalytic proteinase and the ClpP from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 1993; 268: 21165–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arribas J, Luz-Rodriguez M, Alvarez-DoForno R, Castaño JG. Autoantibodies against the multicatalytic proteinase in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Exp Med 1991; 173: 423–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arribas J, Arizti P, Castaño JG. Antibodies against the C2 COOH-terminal region discriminate the active and latent forms of the multicatalytic proteinase complex. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 12858–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Banki K, Colombo E, Sia F, Halladay D, Mattson DH, Tatum AH, et al. Oligodendrocyte-specific expression and autoantigenicity of transaldolase in multiple sclerosis. J Exp Med 1994; 180: 1649–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bochtler M, Ditzel L, Groll M, Hartmann C, Huber R. The proteasome. [Review]. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1999; 28: 295–317.[Web of Science][Medline]

Castaño JG, Mahillo E, Arizti P, Arribas J. Phosphorylation of C8 and C9 subunits of the multicatalytic proteinase by casein kinase II and identification of the C8 phosphorylation sites by direct mutagenesis. Biochemistry 1996; 35: 3782–9.[Medline]

Colombo E, Banki K, Tatum AH, Daucher J, Ferrante P, Murray RS, et al. Comparative analysis of antibody and cell-mediated autoimmunity to transaldolase and myelin basic protein in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest 1997; 99: 1238–50.[Web of Science][Medline]

Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. [Review]. Annu Rev Biochem 1996; 65: 801–47.[Web of Science][Medline]

Davidson A, Diamond B. Autoimmune diseases. [Review]. New Engl J Med 2001; 345: 340–50.[Free Full Text]

Diaz-Villoslada P, Shih A, Shao L, Genain CP, Hauser SL. Autoreactivity to myelin antigens: myelin/oligodendrocyte glycoprotein is a prevalent autoantigen. J Neuroimmunol 1999; 99: 36–43.

Esposito M, Venkatesh V, Otvos L, Weng Z, Vajda S, Banki K, et al. Human transaldolase and cross-reactive viral epitopes identified by autoantibodies of multiple sclerosis patients. J Immunol 1999; 163: 4027–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Feist E, Dorner T, Kuckelkorn U, Schmidtke G, Micheel B, Hiepe F, et al. Proteasome alpha-type subunit C9 is a primary target of autoantibodies in sera of patients with myositis and systemic lupus erythematosus. J Exp Med 1996; 184: 1313–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Feist E, Kuckelkorn U, Dorner T, Donitz H, Scheffler S, Hiepe F, et al. Autoantibodies in primary Sjogren’s syndrome are directed against proteasomal subunits of the alpha and beta type. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 697–702.[Web of Science][Medline]

Fox RI, Stern M, Michelson P. Update on Sjogren syndrome. [Review]. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2000; 12: 391–8.[Web of Science][Medline]

Groll M, Ditzel L, Lowe J, Stock D, Bochtler M, Bartunik HD, et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4Å resolution. Nature 1997; 386: 463–71.[Medline]

Gullapalli D, Phillips LH 2nd. Neurologic manifestations of sarcoidosis. [Review]. Neurol Clin 2002; 20: 59–83.[Web of Science][Medline]

Kovacs B, Lafferty TL, Brent LH, DeHoratius RJ. Transverse myelopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: an analysis of 14 cases and review of the literature. [Review]. Ann Rheum Dis 2000; 59: 120–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lassmann H, Bruck W, Lucchinetti C. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis pathogenesis: implications for diagnosis and therapy. [Review]. Trends Mol Med 2001; 7: 115–21.[Web of Science][Medline]

Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996; 46: 907–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mayo I, Arizti P, Pares A, Oliva J, Doforno RA, de Sagarra MR, et al. Antibodies against the C-terminal region of E.coli ClpP protease in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2000; 33: 528–36.[Web of Science][Medline]

Mengual E, Arizti P, Rodrigo J, Gimenez-Amaya JM, Castaño JG. Immunohistochemical distribution and electron microscopic subcellular localization of the proteasome in the rat CNS. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 6331–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Noseworthy JH. Progress in determining the causes and treatment of multiple sclerosis. [Review]. Nature 1999; 399 (6738 Suppl): A40–7.[Medline]

Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG. Multiple sclerosis. [Review]. New Engl J Med 2000; 343: 938–52.[Free Full Text]

Rodriguez-Vilariño S, Arribas J, Arizti P, Castaño JG. Proteolytic processing and assembly of the C5 subunit into the proteasome complex. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 6592–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

RuizdeMena I, Mahillo E, Arribas J, Castaño JG. Kinetic mechanism of activation by cardiolipin (diphosphatidylglycerol) of the rat liver multicatalytic proteinase. Biochem J 1993; 296: 93–7.

Siva A, Fresko II. Behcet’s disease. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2000; 2: 435–48.[Medline]

Steinman L. Multiple sclerosis: a coordinated immunological attack against myelin in the central nervous system. [Review]. Cell 1996; 85: 299–302.[Web of Science][Medline]

Steinman L. Assessment of animal models for multiple sclerosis and demyelinating disease in the design of rational therapy. [Review]. Neuron 1999; 24: 511–4.[Web of Science][Medline]

Tola MR, Granieri E, Caniatti L, Paolino E, Monetti C, Dovigo L, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus presenting with neurological disorders. J Neurol 1992; 239: 61–4.[Web of Science][Medline]

Trojano M, Paolicelli D. The differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: classification and clinical features of relapsing and progressive neurological syndromes. [Review]. Neurol Sci 2001; 22 Suppl 2: S98–102.

vanNoort JM, van Sechel AC, Bajramovic JJ, el Ouagmiri M, Polman CH, Lassmann H, et al. The small heat-shock protein alpha B-crystallin as candidate autoantigen in multiple sclerosis. Nature 1995; 375: 798–801.[Medline]

Walsh MJ, Murray JM. Dual implication of 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3' phosphodiesterase as major autoantigen and C3 complement-binding protein in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest 1998; 101: 1923–31.[Web of Science][Medline]

Warren KG, Catz I, Steinman L. Fine specificity of the antibody response to myelin basic protein in the central nervous system in multiple sclerosis: the minimal B-cell epitope and a model of its features. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 11061–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wong FS, Dittel BN, Janeway CA Jr. Transgenes and knockout mutations in animal models of type 1 diabetes and multiple sclerosis. [Review]. Immunol Rev 1999; 169: 93–104.[Web of Science][Medline]

Wucherpfennig KW, Catz I, Hausmann S, Strominger JL, Steinman L, Warren KG. Recognition of the immunodominant myelin basic protein peptide by autoantibodies and HLA-DR2-restricted T cell clones from multiple sclerosis patients. Identity of key contact residues in the B-cell and T-cell epitopes. J Clin Invest 1997; 100: 1114–22.[Web of Science][Medline]

York IA, Goldberg AL, Mo XY, Rock KL. Proteolysis and class I major histocompatibility complex antigen presentation. [Review]. Immunol Rev 1999; 172: 49–66.[Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. Scheffler, U. Kuckelkorn, K. Egerer, T. Dorner, K. Reiter, A. Soza, G.-R. Burmester, and E. Feist
Autoimmune reactivity against the 20S-proteasome includes immunosubunits LMP2 ({beta}1i), MECL1 ({beta}2i) and LMP7 ({beta}5i)
Rheumatology, May 1, 2008; 47(5): 622 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
S Krause, U Kuckelkorn, T Dorner, G-R Burmester, E Feist, and P-M Kloetzel
Immunoproteasome subunit LMP2 expression is deregulated in Sjogren's syndrome but not in other autoimmune disorders
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2006; 65(8): 1021 - 1027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. Sundstrom, P. Juto, G. Wadell, G. Hallmans, A. Svenningsson, L. Nystrom, J. Dillner, and L. Forsgren
An altered immune response to Epstein-Barr virus in multiple sclerosis: A prospective study
Neurology, June 22, 2004; 62(12): 2277 - 2282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayo, I.
Right arrow Articles by Castaño, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayo, I.
Right arrow Articles by Castaño, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?