Brain, Vol. 125, No. 3, 676-677,
March 2002
© 2002 Guarantors of Brain
Letters to the Editor |
Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children
1 Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK
Correspondence to: Mr J. S. Elston, Consultant Ophthalmologist, Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE UK E-mail: Mary.Spearman{at}orh.anglox.nhs.uk
Geddes et al. have raised several interesting questions about the pathogenesis of non-accidental head injury. It has been suspected previously that hypoxia secondary to apnoea rather than direct impact is responsible for the diffuse brain damage seen in non-accidental injury (Johnson et al., 1995
). The authors’ neuro-pathological findings support this theory and also demonstrate injuries at the cranio-cervical junction that account for the apnoea and hypoxia in infants with non-accidental injury (Geddes et al., 2001a, b). Although we accept that it may not be necessary to shake an infant very violently to produce a stretch injury to its neuraxis, we disagree with the authors’ proposal that repetitive acceleration-deceleration injury need not occur in the shaken baby syndrome. This hypothesis does not explain the characteristic presence of retinal haemorrhages in these infants (Kivlin, 2000), including those examined by the authors.
Of the theories that have been proposed for the mechanism of retinal haemorrhages in non-accidental shaking injury, traction between the vitreous gel and the retina is the likeliest mechanism. The infant eye has strong adhesions between the vitreous gel and retina, especially around the optic disc and in the retinal periphery. The differential movement at the interface between the vitreous and retina due to acceleration–deceleration forces (Duhaime, 1987; Massicotte, 1991; Green 1996) is believed to result in shearing of retinal vessels, which may be dilated as a result of increased intracranial or intrathoracic pressure (Gilkes and Mann, 1967). Anterior tracking of sub-arachnoid haemorrhage was proposed as a possible mechanism (Jacobi, 1986), but this theory has been disproved by clinico-pathological studies (Giangiacomo, 1988; Riffenburgh, 1991). It is evident that some factor or factors unique to the trauma suffered by these infants are needed to produce haemorrhages of the distribution and severity consistently seen in non-accidental injury. Retinal haemorrhages are very rarely seen after witnessed or independently verifiable single impact accidental trauma in infants and children, including whiplash injury and even in fatal injury (Buys, 1992; Duhaime, 1992; Johnson and Braun, 1993). Similarly, vigorous cardio-pulmonary resuscitation or epileptic fits rarely produce retinal haemorrhages.
From consideration of the likely mechanism of retinal haemorrhages in non-accidental shaking injury and the rare description of the trauma by perpetrators, it is evident that sufficient acceleration-deceleration forces must be generated by repetitive to and fro shaking. An infant may not need to be shaken for long, but the shaking is necessarily violent.
Apnoea induced by cranio-cervical injury might be primarily responsible for the diffuse brain changes seen in non-accidental injury. However, we conclude from the authors' own data that severe acceleration-deceleration must occur in shaken baby syndrome. The ocular changes cannot be ignored, and require a sufficiently severe angular velocity change that could not be generated by anything short of violent shaking.
The authors’ conclusions are open to misinterpretation, and may have serious implications, both scientific and legal, on the mechanism of non-accidental shaking injuries.
References
Buys YM, Levin AV, Enzenauer RW, Elder JE, Letourneau MA, Humphreys RP, et al. Retinal findings after head trauma in infants and young children. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 1718–23.[Web of Science][Medline]
Duhaime AC, Alario AJ, Lewander WJ Schut L, Sutton LN, Seidl TS, et al. Head injury in very young children: mechanisms, injury types, and ophthalmologic findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age. Pediatrics 1992; 90: 179–85
Duhaime AC, Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE, Bruce DA, Margulies SS, Wiser R. The shaken baby syndrome. A clinical, pathological, and biomechanical study. J Neurosurg 1987; 66: 409–15.[Web of Science][Medline]
Geddes JF, Hackshaw AK, Vowles GH, Nickols CD, Whitwell HL. Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. I. Patterns of brain damage. Brain 2001a; 124: 1290–8.
Geddes JF, Vowles GH, Hackshaw AK, Nickols CD, Scott IS, Whitwell HL. Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. II. Microscopic brain injury in infants. Brain 2001b; 124: 1299–306.
Giangiacomo J, Khan JA, Levine C, Thompson VM. Sequential cranial computed tomography in infants with retinal hemorrhages. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 295–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
Gilkes MW, Mann TP. Fundi of battered babies [letter]. Lancet 1967; 2: 468–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
Green MA, Lieberman G, Milroy CM, Parsons MA. Ocular and cerebral trauma in non-accidental injury in infancy: underlying mechanisms and implications for paediatric practice. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 282–7.
Jacobi G. Damage patterns in severe child abuse with and without fatal sequelae. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 1986; 134: 307–15.[Medline]
10 .Johnson DL, Braun D, Friendly D. Accidental head trauma and retinal hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 231–4.[Web of Science][Medline]
Johnson DL, Boal D, Baule R. Role of apnea in nonaccidental head injury. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995; 23: 305–10.[Web of Science][Medline]
Kivlin JD, Simons KB, Lazoritz S, Ruttum MS. Shaken baby syndrome. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1246–54.[Web of Science][Medline]
Massicotte SJ, Folberg R, Torczynski E, Gilliland MG, Luckenbach MW. Vitreoretinal traction and perimacular retinal folds in the eyes of deliberately traumatized children. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 1124–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
Riffenburgh RS, Sathyavagiswaran L. Ocular findings at autopsy of child abuse victims. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 1519–24.[Web of Science][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||