Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Senderek, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Senderek, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 126, No. 3, 642-649, March 2003
© 2003 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awg068

Mutations in the ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein-1 (GDAP1) gene in intermediate type autosomal recessive Charcot–Marie–Tooth neuropathy

Jan Senderek1, Carsten Bergmann1, Vincent T. Ramaekers2, Eva Nelis4, Günther Bernert5, Astrid Makowski1, Stephan Züchner3, Peter De Jonghe4, Sabine Rudnik-Schöneborn1, Klaus Zerres1 and J. Michael Schröder3

Departments of 1 Human Genetics, 2 Neuropediatrics and 3 Neuropathology, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany, 4 Department of Biochemistry, Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology, Born-Bunge Foundation, University of Antwerp, Belgium and 5 Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, Austria

Correspondence to: Carsten Bergmann, MD, Department of Human Genetics, Aachen University of Technology, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany E-mail: cbergmann{at}ukaachen.de

Received May 5, 2002. Revised September 13, 2002. Accepted October 16, 2002.


    Summary
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Methods and subjects
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mutations in the gene for the ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein-1 (GDAP1) on 8q21 recently were reported to cause autosomal recessive Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) sensorimotor neuropathy. Neurophysiology and nerve pathology were heterogeneous in these cases: a subset of GDAP1 mutations was associated with peripheral nerve demyelination, whereas others resulted in axonal degeneration. In this study, we identified two novel mutations disrupting the GDAP1 reading frame. Homozygosity for a single base pair insertion in exon 3 (c.349_350insT) was observed in affected children from a Turkish inbred pedigree. The other novel allele detected in a German patient was a homozygous mutation of the intron 4 donor splice site (c.579 + 1G>A). Patients with GDAP1 mutations displayed severe, early childhood-onset CMT neuropathy with prominent pes equinovarus deformity and impairment of hand muscles. Nerve conduction velocities were between 25 and 35 m/s and peripheral nerve pathology showed axonal as well as demyelinating changes. These findings fitted the definition of intermediate type CMT and further support the view that GDAP1 is vital for both, axonal integrity and Schwann cell properties.

Keywords: hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy; Charcot–Marie–Tooth neuropathy; autosomal recessive; intermediate; ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein-1; GDAP1

Abbreviations: ARCMT= autosomal recessive Charcot–Marie–Tooth neuropathy; CMT = Charcot–Marie–Tooth neuropathy; GDAP1 = ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein-1; GST = glutathione S-transferase; MNCV = motor nerve conduction velocity; NCV = nerve conduction velocity; SSCP = single-strand conformation polymorphism


    Introduction
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Methods and subjects
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HMSN) or Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) disease comprises a group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders of the peripheral nervous system. With an overall prevalence of 1 in 2500, CMT is the most common inherited neuromuscular disorder in man (Skre, 1974Go). The clinical features of CMT include progressive distal muscle weakness and atrophy, starting in the legs and spreading to the upper extremities, foot deformities, steppage gait, distal sensory loss and decreased or absent tendon reflexes (Harding and Thomas, 1980Go). On nerve biopsy and neurophysiology, CMT falls into two main subtypes, the demyelinating form, CMT1, and the axonal type, CMT2 (Dyck et al., 1993Go). CMT1 is characterized by reduced nerve conduction velocities (NCVs) with values <38 m/s for the median motor nerve, segmental de- and remyelination, and onion bulb formation. These changes differentiate CMT1 from CMT2 in which NCVs are near normal and nerve pathology shows axonal loss and regenerative sprouting. It has been suggested that these differences originate from distinct aetiologies, with a primary Schwann cell defect in CMT1, and axonal dysfunction in CMT2.

The majority of CMT cases are autosomal dominantly or X-linked dominantly inherited (Vance, 2000Go). Autosomal recessive CMT (ARCMT) is a much rarer disorder and clinically similar to the dominant forms, but usually more severe with an earlier age of onset (Thomas, 2000Go). At least 10 loci responsible for ARCMT and four candidate genes have been identified so far (Warner et al., 1998Go; Bolino et al., 2000Go; Kalaydjieva et al., 2000Go; Boerkoel et al., 2001Go; Guilbot et al., 2001Go; Nelis, 2001Go). The first recognition of a recessive CMT locus (CMT4A) was by Ben Othmane et al. (1993Go) who mapped the responsible gene to chromosome 8q13–q21 in four Tunisian inbred kindreds. This locus turned out to be a major cause of ARCMT, making up ~25% of cases (Nelis et al., 2001Go). Recently, Baxter et al. (2002Go) and Cuesta et al. (2002Go) found that the gene for the ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein-1 (GDAP1) resides within the 8q21 candidate region. They subsequently sequenced this gene in ARCMT families positive for linkage to 8q21 and identified several causative mutations (Baxter et al., 2002Go; Cuesta et al., 2002Go). A subset of the so far described patients with GDAP1 mutations presented with a demyelinating neuropathic phenotype (Baxter et al., 2002Go), while other families displayed axonal type ARCMT (Cuesta et al., 2002Go).

Here we report two novel GDAP1 mutations which presumably result in a shortened non-functional peptide. These alleles were found to cause a phenotype which combines both pathologies, demyelinating and axonal. This is the first report on GDAP1 mutations causing an intermediate type of ARCMT. Detailed fine structural findings in the diseased nerves will be presented.


    Methods and subjects
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Methods and subjects
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A series of 10 families with the inferred diagnosis of ARCMT was selected (Table 1). Selection criteria were (i) progressive sensorimotor neuropathy with onset in the first decade; (ii) absence of clinical symptoms and neurophysiological signs in the parents; and (iii) exclusion of mutations in dominant CMT genes. Clinical details, the results of nerve conduction studies, and those for nerve biopsy if carried out were obtained in all cases. One Turkish consanguineous family presented with affected children in two independent sibships (AC531). Two German pedigrees included at least two affected siblings (CMT117 and CMT425). No consanguinity was known in the latter families. Three Turkish inbred families with a single affected child were also included in the study (CMT32, CMT53 and CMT413). The remaining patients were single affected children from German families. Neurophysiology and nerve biopsy indicated a demyelinating, axonal or intermediate type of CMT. Mutation analysis for dominant CMT genes PMP22, Cx32, MPZ and EGR2 had been negative prior to testing for ARCMT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 ARCMT patients
 
Genotyping for the ARCMT locus on 8q21 was performed in families AC531, CMT117, CMT425, CMT32, CMT53 and CMT413. The following microsatellite markers were used: D8S286, D8S548, D8S551, D8S1829, B9CAG and P26ACG. Primers for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification were as published by the Genome Database (http://www.gdb.org) and by Ben Othmane et al. (1998Go). Sense primers were labelled with FAM fluorophores (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) for electrophoresis and analysis on an ABI PRISM 310 genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany). Individuals with possible linkage to the CMT4A locus were screened for GDAP1 mutations. All patients for whom haplotype analysis was not applicable were subjected directly to sequencing of the GDAP1 gene.

For mutation analysis, primers were constructed outside the predicted six GDAP1-coding exons using the Primer3 program (http://www.genome.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer/ primer3.cgi). These primers were used to PCR amplify genomic DNA templates from the index patients. PCR products were gel purified with the QiaEx-kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced using ABI BigDye chemistry (Applied Biosystems). Samples were run and analysed on an ABI PRISM 310 genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems). Appropriate conditions for single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis were established for exons bearing mutations to test for the segregation of the altered allele. In the case of PCR products >300 bp in length, exonic primers were designed to yield smaller products suitable for SSCP. DNA samples from 100 apparently unrelated normal control subjects (58 females and 42 males) were also tested under the same SSCP conditions.

Sural nerve biopsies were performed and processed for light and electron microscopic examination using standard methods. Morphometric, optic-electronic evaluation was performed on a KS300 system of Zeiss/Kontron (Eching/Munich, Germany). Five representative endoneurial areas per nerve (measuring 5412 µm2 each) were analysed. In selecting these areas, care was taken to avoid perineurial spaces or septa, blood vessels, distortions and fixation artefacts.

Written informed consent was obtained from all family members included in the study for use of blood and DNA samples for diagnostic purposes.


    Results
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Methods and subjects
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CMT4A markers were homozygous in affected probands from Turkish inbred family AC531 (Fig. 1A). In family CMT117, there is an unaffected sib who shares haplotypes with an affected child. Therefore, family CMT117 is excluded for linkage to CMT4A. In family CMT425, positive but insignificant lod scores were obtained. Patients CMT32, CMT53 and CMT413 from consanguineous marriages did not present with a homozygous 8q21 haplotype and were therefore regarded as unlikely to have CMT4A.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Family AC531. (A) Pedigree of the family with two loops of consanguinity. Haplotype analysis with 8q21 markers showed homozygous haplotypes in both affected patients. (B) Sequencing analysis of patients’ GDAP1 exon 3. The homozygous T insertion is marked by an arrow in the chromatogram. Amino acid positions altered consecutive to the reading frame shift are printed in italics.

 
Two previously unreported mutations of the GDAP1 gene were identified; these mutations were present in the homozygous state and were not found in healthy controls. Another mutation, a heterozygous substitution of Arg282 with cysteine, was detected in family CMT48. The allele was inherited by the clinically normal father. This mutation was not found in 100 control individuals. However, no mutation of the second allele could be identified by GDAP1 sequencing. A c.507G>T transversion in exon 4 was present in the homozygous and heterozygous state in ARCMT patients as well as in normal controls. This DNA variant did not alter the corresponding serine codon 169 (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Reported GDAP1 mutations and variants
 
Family AC531
This family originates from Southern Turkey, near the Syrian border. The parents in the two nucleus families (III.2 and III.3; III.4 and III.5) with affected individuals were first cousins (Fig. 1A). A homozygous GDAP1 mutation was detected in the index case, AC531-IV.5, and his female cousin, AC531-IV.3. This mutation is a T insertion in GDAP1 exon 3 (c.349_350insT) resulting in a frameshift and premature stop of translation 12 GDAP1 missense amino acid residues downstream (Fig. 1B, Table 2). For index patient AC531-IV.5, pregnancy and delivery were reported as uneventful. The neonatal period and early motor milestones had also been normal. He started to walk independently at the age of 14 months and gait was noted to have been clumsy since then. He progressively developed bilateral pes equinovarus deformity so that he had to walk on the outer edges of the feet. At age 3 years, bilateral foot drop and steppage gait became apparent. Bilateral lengthening of the achilles tendons was performed at the age of 4 years and brought about only temporary amelioration. Examination at age 7 years revealed atrophy of the calves, foot muscles and, to a lesser extent, of the thenar and hypothenar muscles. Muscle hypotonia was noted. Lower limb weakness and clubfoot deformity impaired ambulation, which was only possible with the aid of braces. Heel and toe walking was impossible. Fine motor capacities of the hands were severely disturbed, and he was not able to grab a pen. Upper limb tendon reflexes were diminished and lower limb tendon reflexes were not obtainable. Sensory qualities for vibration, touch and pain were reduced in the feet and lower legs, but preserved in the hands. Electromyography revealed neurogenic changes. At age 6 years, median motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) was reduced to 31 m/s, with severely decreased motor action potential amplitude. Motor conduction of the peroneal nerve was also slowed. Sensory action potential of the median nerve was severely decreased while stimulation of the sural nerve resulted in no response (Table 3). Both parents had normal NCVs. His cousin, patient AC531-IV.3, showed similar clinical features. Clubfoot deformity was even more prominent in her and required repeated surgery. Moreover, severe wasting of hand muscles with claw hand deformity could be noted.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Nerve conduction data
 
Family AC49
The 6-year-old girl II-2 is the second child of healthy German parents. No consanguinity was known in this family. GDAP1 sequencing disclosed a homozygous mutation of the intron 4 donor splice site (c.579 + 1G>A) in the affected patient (Fig. 2, Table 2). Haplotype analysis proved homozygosity for all 8q21 markers tested. Thus, the parents might well be at least distantly related. On the mRNA level, the c.579 + 1G>A mutation will most probably result in skipping of exon 4 (Nakai and Sakamoto, 1994Go). Unfortunately, frozen tissue from the nerve and muscle biopsy was not left and a fresh blood sample was unobtainable for mRNA isolation to prove this hypothesis. Clinical records of patient AC49-II.2 included an uneventful pregnancy and neonatal period, and normal early motor milestones. Since she started to walk at the age of 18 months, both feet were noted to be twisted and she could not place the sole flat on the ground. Equinovarus deformity was first diagnosed at age 2 years and subsequently required orthopaedic correction. Examination at age 6 years revealed severe wasting of the calves, foot muscles and, to a lesser extent, of the hand muscles. Clubfoot deformity was prominent. Heel and toe walking was impossible. She still could ambulate independently over a distance of 100 m, but required use of crutches for longer distances. Fine motor capacities of the hands were disturbed due to claw hand deformity, and she was not able to tie her shoes. Upper limb tendon reflexes were diminished and lower limb tendon reflexes could not be elicited. All sensory qualities were diminished in the feet and lower legs, and to a lesser degree in the hands. Neurophysiological studies were performed at age 5 years. MNCV of the median nerve was 26.4 m/s, with severely decreased amplitude of the evoked muscle action potential. No muscle action potentials could be obtained after stimulation of the tibial and peroneal nerves. Sensory action potential of the median nerve was low, and no response to stimulation of the sural nerve was obtained (Table 3). Nerve conduction studies in the parents and in the healthy brother were normal.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Family AC49. (A) Sequencing analysis of the patient’s GDAP1 exon 4 displays a homozygous G to A transition of position +1 of the donor splice site (arrow). (B) Segregation of the mutant allele in the family. SSCP analysis of the exon 4 PCR product reveals heterozygosity in both parents. The healthy brother inherited the normal alleles (C = healthy controls).

 
Histology
Patients AC531-IV.5 and AC49-II.2 presented with comparable findings on sural nerve biopsies (Fig. 3A and B). Patient AC531-IV.5 was biopsied at the age of 3.5 years. The sural nerve specimen showed marked loss of large myelinated axons and numerous clusters of small, closely adjacent regenerated fibres. Occasional demyelinated fibres and some isolated, thinly remyelinated fibres with surrounding flat cell processes were also apparent. In patient AC49-II.2, biopsies were performed at the age of 2 years. The sural nerve appeared to be affected similarly to patient AC531-IV.5, but there were more isolated, thinly remyelinated fibres with incipient onion bulb formation. Clusters of regenerated fibres were less frequent. Morphometric assessment confirmed the reduction of the number of large diameter fibres in both patients with a relative increase of small myelinated fibres. The myelin area per endoneurial area, the mean total fibre area and the mean myelin area were decreased (Table 4). Assessment of muscle specimens showed neurogenic atrophy.



View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Light microscopic (A and B) and ultrastructural (CE) findings. (A) Sural nerve biopsy from patient AC531-IV.5 at the age of 3.5 years. The number of large myelinated fibres is severely reduced, and numerous small clusters of regenerated fibres are encountered (arrowheads). Some isolated axons have disproportionately thin myelin sheaths (arrow). Semi-thin section, toluidine blue stain, x266. (B) Sural nerve biopsy from patient AC49-II.2 at the age of 2 years. There is a similar decrease of large myelinated fibres, but isolated, thinly myelinated axons (arrows) are more prevalent compared with A. Semi-thin section, toluidine blue stain, x287. (C) A cluster of two regenerated axons from patient AC49-II.2 is surrounded by supernumerary Schwann cell processes. One axon shows an early stage of remyelination, x6580. (D) Sural nerve biopsy from patient AC531-IV.5: myelin degradation products in an early band of Buengner indicate preceding axonal decay, x9450. (E) Early stage of an onion bulb formation in the nerve biopsy from patient AC531-IV.5, x7700.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Morphometric data
 
Electron microscopy (Fig. 3C–E) revealed numerous degenerating axons, bands of Buengner and groups of regenerated myelinated fibres combined with not yet remyelinated fibres. Some of these clusters were surrounded by supernumerary Schwann cell processes forming onion bulb-like structures. Demyelinated axons and incipient onion bulb formations with up to three Schwann cell layers were apparent in both cases, but were encountered more frequently in patient AC49-II.2. Few fibres displayed non-compacted innermost myelin lamellae with adaxonal vacuoles. Analysis of myelin periodicity did not reveal further changes. The unmyelinated fibres appeared to be better preserved than the myelinated ones, yet their diameter varied considerably. Specific fine structural changes were not detectable.


    Discussion
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Methods and subjects
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have identified two pathogenic mutations in the GDAP1 gene in a Turkish and a German family, both with autosomal recessive inheritance of CMT neuropathy. We also performed haplotyping of the GDAP1 locus and sequencing of the gene in eight further families compatible with autosomal recessive neuropathies. One further presumably pathogenic mutation was observed; however, no mutation of the second allele could be detected in this case. The clinical phenotype of patients with GDAP1 mutations was similar, and neurophysiology and nerve biopsy indicated a combined axonal and demyelinating lesion.

Our findings extend the spectrum of known mutations in the GDAP1 gene (Baxter et al., 2002Go; Cuesta et al., 2002Go). Two mutations severely disrupt the gene and are likely to result in loss of function of the protein by significantly altering its structure. Thus, their pathogenic character seems to be very likely. The c.349_350insT mutation in exon 3 (family AC531) causes a frameshift and creates a truncated protein, with the last 12 amino acids being missense (Thr117fs). The c.579 + 1G>A mutation (family AC49) destroys the sequence of the donor splice site of intron 4. Three different consequences could be expected for a splice site mutation, i.e. skipping of the entire preceding exon, read-through of the retained intron or use of a cryptic splice donor site. Exon skipping is the most frequently observed result of a splice site mutation in mammals (Nakai and Sakamoto, 1994Go). As to the present case, absence of exon 4 from the mature GDAP1 transcript would result in a premature termination codon in the aberrantly spliced mRNA as the junction between exon 3 and exon 5 is not in-frame. Unfortunately, this could not be proven to be the case as no appropriate source for mRNA isolation was accessible. The Arg282Cys (c.844C>T) missense mutation (family CMT48) represents either a rare polymorphism or a causative substitution if the corresponding patient has autosomal recessive disorder and a second mutation in GDAP1 that we were unable to detect. Interestingly, the clinical course as well as the electrophysiological and histopathological phenotype of family CMT48’s propositus were similar to those observed in the other two families with GDAP1 mutations. Arg282Cys affects an amino acid residue that is highly conserved in the GDAP1 sequences of various mammals (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml). It is contained in the C-terminal glutathione S-transferase (GST)-like domain which is probably important for GDAP1 function (see below). Moreover, this variant could not be detected in healthy controls that were analysed under appropriate SSCP conditions. Consequently, Arg282Cys might be a pathogenic mutation rather than a harmless variant, but more definite proof has to come from functional studies or identification of the mutation in trans in this family. Since the allele is inherited from the clinically normal father, there is no evidence for a dominant mutation. The c.507G>T transversion in exon 4 does not change the corresponding serine codon 169 and occurs with a high frequency in the general population. Therefore, it is most likely to be a polymorphism without phenotype.

The GDAP1 gene consists of six exons which give rise to a 4.1 kb transcript encoding an open reading frame of 358 amino acids (Liu et al., 1999Go; Baxter et al., 2002Go; Cuesta et al., 2002Go). Little is known about the function of GDAP1. The GDAP1 amino acid sequence has strong similarity to GSTs that serve as antioxidant systems preventing degenerative cellular processes (Baez et al., 1997Go). GDAP1 is expressed in various tissues, with the highest levels in brain and spinal cord. Amplification of GDAP1 transcripts from human and mouse peripheral nerve and cauda equina suggested that GDAP1 expression occurs not only in neurons but also in Schwann cells, the primary source of mRNA in the peripheral nervous system (Cuesta et al., 2002Go). Mutated GDAP1 might impair the correct catalysing S conjugation of reduced glutathione, resulting in progressive attrition of the Schwann cell and/or the axon.

In the present study, all patients with GDAP1 mutations showed severe early childhood-onset neuropathy with prominent weakness beginning in the lower limbs, spreading proximally and affecting the distal upper limbs within the first decade of life. Sensory disturbance was less prominent. All three patients had clubfoot deformity which severely impaired ambulation. Clinical phenotypes reported so far in patients with GDAP1 mutations (Baxter et al., 2002Go; Cuesta et al., 2002Go) have been similar to those seen in our patients. Progressive sensorimotor neuropathy started in infancy and led to loss of independent ambulation at the beginning of the second decade. GDAP1-related ARCMT seems to be clinically homogeneous without manifestation other than peripheral neuropathy. Hoarsening of the voice due to vocal cord paresis as observed in the families reported by Cuesta et al. (2002Go) might also be noted in CMT patients with other genetic causes.

GDAP1 mutations have been found to cause both demyelinating and axonal peripheral nerve lesion (Baxter et al., 2002Go; Cuesta et al., 2002Go). In the present cases with GDAP1 mutations, nerve pathology was consistent with both axonal degeneration and demyelination. This intermediate form of CMT has already been observed in cases with autosomal dominant inheritance and occurs with median MNCVs between 25 and 45 m/s (Davis et al., 1978Go; Rouger et al., 1997Go). In our patients, median MNCVs were at the lower extreme of this range. This might be attributed to a more rapid progression of this autosomal recessive disease. In addition to segmental demyelination, NCV slowing would be aggravated by decay of large, fast-conducting axons. Prominent fibre loss was reflected by severely decreased motor/sensory nerve action potential amplitudes and by nerve histopathology. The finding of phenotypic variability with GDAP1 mutations adds to reports that mutations in the known CMT1 genes for the structural myelin protein MPZ (P0) and for the gap junction protein connexin32 (Cx32) can also set off axonal CMT2 (Vance, 2000Go). Obviously, the axonal and demyelinating delineation does not imply unique aetiologies.

It has been noted previously that ARCMT linked to 8q21 makes up ~25% of all ARCMT cases (Nelis et al., 2001Go), which is in line with the detection rate observed in the present study. Up to now, without knowing the gene responsible, diagnosis of CMT4A was dependent on linkage analysis that—in the setting of genetic heterogeneity—was restricted to extended pedigrees. Identification of GDAP1 as the causative gene defect now allows direct mutation analysis in individual patients also from small, non-consanguineous families with only one affected child. A molecular genetic diagnosis eliminates the need for invasive techniques (e.g. sural nerve biopsy), prevents fruitless therapeutic approaches (e.g. for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy) and allows accurate genetic counselling.


    Acknowledgements
 
We wish to thank the CMT patients and their relatives for their cooperation. This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. E.N. is a postdoctoral fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research (FWO-Flanders).


    References
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Methods and subjects
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Baez S, Segura-Aguilar J, Widersten M, Johansson AS, Mannervik B. Glutathione transferases catalyse the detoxication of oxidized metabolites (o-quinones) of catecholamines and may serve as an antioxidant system preventing degenerative cellular processes. Biochem J 1997; 324: 25–8.

Baxter RV, Ben Othmane K, Rochelle JM, Stajich JE, Hulette C, Dew-Knight S, et al. Ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein-1 is mutant in Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 4A/8q21. Nature Genet 2002; 30: 21–2.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ben Othmane K, Hentati F, Lennon F, Ben Hamida C, Blel S, Roses AD, et al. Linkage of a locus (CMT4A) for autosomal recessive Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease to chromosome 8q. Hum Mol Genet 1993; 2: 1625–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ben Othmane K, Rochelle JM, Ben Hamida M, Slotterbeck B, Rao N, Hentati F, et al. Fine localization of the CMT4A locus using a PAC contig and haplotype analysis. Neurogenetics 1998; 2: 18–23.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bertram M, Schroder JM. Developmental changes at the node and paranode in human sural nerves: morphometric and fine-structural evaluation. Cell Tissue Res 1993; 273: 499–509.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Boerkoel CF, Takashima H, Stankiewicz P, Garcia CA, Leber SM, Rhee-Morris L, et al. Periaxin mutations cause recessive Dejerine–Sottas neuropathy. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68: 325–33.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bolino A, Muglia M, Conforti FL, LeGuern E, Salih MA, Georgiou DM, et al. Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 4B is caused by mutations in the gene encoding myotubularin-related protein-2. Nature Genet 2000; 25: 17–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Cuesta A, Pedrola L, Sevilla T, Garcia-Planells J, Chumillas MJ, Mayordomo F, et al. The gene encoding ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein 1 is mutated in axonal Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 4A disease. Nature Genet 2002; 30: 22–5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Davis CJ, Bradley WG, Madrid R. The peroneal muscular atrophy syndrome: clinical, genetic, electrophysiological and nerve biopsy studies. I. Clinical, genetic and electrophysiological findings and classification. J Genet Hum 1978; 26: 311–49.[Web of Science][Medline]

Dyck PJ, Chance P, Lebo R, Carney JA. Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Griffin JW, Low PA, Poduslo JF, editors. Peripheral neuropathy. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1993. p. 1094–136.

Guilbot A, Williams A, Ravise N, Verny C, Brice A, Sherman DL, et al. A mutation in periaxin is responsible for CMT4F, an autosomal recessive form of Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 10: 415–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harding AE, Thomas PK. The clinical features of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy types I and II. Brain 1980; 103: 259–80.[Free Full Text]

Kalaydjieva L, Gresham D, Gooding R, Heather L, Baas F, de Jonge R, et al. N-myc downstream-regulated gene 1 is mutated in hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy-Lom. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 67: 47–58.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Liu H, Nakagawa T, Kanematsu T, Uchida T, Tsuji S. Isolation of 10 differentially expressed cDNAs in differentiated Neuro2a cells induced through controlled expression of the GD3 synthase gene. J Neurochem 1999; 72: 1781–90.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nakai K, Sakamoto H. Construction of a novel database containing aberrant splicing mutations of mammalian genes. Gene 1994; 141: 171–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nelis E, Irobi J, De Vriendt E, Van Gerwen V, Perez Novo C, Topaloglu H, et al. Homozygosity mapping of families with recessive Charcot–Marie–Tooth neuropathies. Acta Myol 2001; 20: 39–42.

Rouger H, LeGuern E, Birouk N, Gouider R, Tardieu S, Plassart E, et al. Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease with intermediate motor nerve conduction velocities: characterization of 14 Cx32 mutations in 35 families. Hum Mutat 1997; 10: 443–52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Skre H. Genetic and clinical aspects of Charcot–Marie–Tooth’s disease. Clin Genet 1974; 6: 98–118.[Web of Science][Medline]

Thomas PK. Autosomal recessive hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. Curr Opin Neurol 2000; 13: 565–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Vance JM. The many faces of Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease. Arch Neurol 2000; 57: 638–40.[Free Full Text]

Warner LE, Mancias P, Butler IJ, McDonald CM, Keppen L, Koob KG, et al. Mutations in the early growth response 2 (EGR2) gene are associated with hereditary myelinopathies. Nature Genet 1998; 18: 382–4.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
K. G. Claeys, S. Zuchner, M. Kennerson, J. Berciano, A. Garcia, K. Verhoeven, E. Storey, J. R. Merory, H. M. E. Bienfait, M. Lammens, et al.
Phenotypic spectrum of dynamin 2 mutations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy
Brain, July 1, 2009; 132(7): 1741 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
H. Houlden, M. Laura, F. Wavrant-De Vrieze, J. Blake, N. Wood, and M. M. Reilly
Mutations in the HSP27 (HSPB1) gene cause dominant, recessive, and sporadic distal HMN/CMT type 2
Neurology, November 18, 2008; 71(21): 1660 - 1668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Bouhouche, N. Birouk, H. Azzedine, A. Benomar, G. Durosier, D. Ente, M.-P. Muriel, M. Ruberg, I. Slassi, M. Yahyaoui, et al.
Autosomal recessive axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (ARCMT2): phenotype-genotype correlations in 13 Moroccan families
Brain, April 1, 2007; 130(4): 1062 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. Niemann, M. Ruegg, V. La Padula, A. Schenone, and U. Suter
Ganglioside-induced differentiation associated protein 1 is a regulator of the mitochondrial network: new implications for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
J. Cell Biol., September 26, 2005; 170(7): 1067 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
L. Pedrola, A. Espert, X. Wu, R. Claramunt, M. E. Shy, and F. Palau
GDAP1, the protein causing Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4A, is expressed in neurons and is associated with mitochondria
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2005; 14(8): 1087 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
R Claramunt, L Pedrola, T Sevilla, A Lopez de Munain, J Berciano, A Cuesta, B Sanchez-Navarro, J M Millan, G M Saifi, J R Lupski, et al.
Genetics of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4A: mutations, inheritance, phenotypic variability, and founder effect
J. Med. Genet., April 1, 2005; 42(4): 358 - 365.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
Y. Parman, E. Battaloglu, I. Baris, B. Bilir, M. Poyraz, N. Bissar-Tadmouri, A. Williams, N. Ammar, E. Nelis, V. Timmerman, et al.
Clinicopathological and genetic study of early-onset demyelinating neuropathy
Brain, November 1, 2004; 127(11): 2540 - 2550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
E Di Maria, R Gulli, P Balestra, D Cassandrini, S Pigullo, L Doria-Lamba, M Bado, A Schenone, F Ajmar, P Mandich, et al.
A novel mutation of GDAP1 associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in three Italian families: evidence for a founder effect
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2004; 75(10): 1495 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Tazir, H. Azzedine, S. Assami, P. Sindou, S. Nouioua, R. Zemmouri, T. Hamadouche, M. Chaouch, J. Feingold, J. M. Vallat, et al.
Phenotypic variability in autosomal recessive axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease due to the R298C mutation in lamin A/C
Brain, January 1, 2004; 127(1): 154 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Marco, A. Cuesta, L. Pedrola, F. Palau, and I. Marin
Evolutionary and Structural Analyses of GDAP1, Involved in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, Characterize a Novel Class of Glutathione Transferase-Related Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 176 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
T. Sevilla, A. Cuesta, M. J. Chumillas, F. Mayordomo, L. Pedrola, F. Palau, and J. J. Vilchez
Clinical, electrophysiological and morphological findings of Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy with vocal cord palsy and mutations in the GDAP1 gene
Brain, September 1, 2003; 126(9): 2023 - 2033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
A De Sandre-Giovannoli, M Chaouch, I Boccaccio, R Bernard, V Delague, D Grid, J M Vallat, N Levy, and A Megarbane
Phenotypic and genetic exploration of severe demyelinating and secondary axonal neuropathies resulting from GDAP1 nonsense and splicing mutations
J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2003; 40(7): e87 - 87.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Senderek, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Senderek, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?