Letter to the Editor |
Nucleus subputaminalis: neglected part of the basal nucleus of Meynert
Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Croatian Institute for Brain Research, Zagreb University, Croatia
Correspondence to: Professor Goran Simic, Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Croatian Institute for Brain Research, Zagreb University, Croatia E-mail: gsimic{at}hiim.hr
Received November 19, 2005. Accepted January 16, 2006.
With much pleasure we have read the article written by Stephan Teipel and collaborators (Teipel et al., 2005
) entitled Measurement of basal forebrain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease using MRI published on July 13 in Brain. We cannot but agree that the automated technique of image regression analysis implemented to the analysis of proton density weighted structural MRI of the basal forebrain presented in the article might have excellent value for in vivo determination of the time course of basal forebrain cholinergic neuronal degeneration as well as its temporal relationship to cortical atrophy in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
However, we would like to draw the reader's attention to Fig. 2A in Teipel et al. (2005)
. In plates 103 out of 205 and 102 out of 203 in this figure, the cluster of magnocellular cholinergic neurons located in the anterior part of the basal forebrain (ventrolaterally to the anterior commissure) could not be recognized by authors and was designated as Ch4 p?. This particular cell group, which is topographically, cytochemically and cytoarchitectonically intimately related to the basal nucleus, was described in the human and anthropoid monkey brain and named as nucleus subputaminalis (NSP) by Giuseppe Ayala. He published his findings many years ago in your esteemed journal (Ayala, 1915
).
Although it has been neglected in most classical (such as Kölliker, 1896
and Brockhaus, 1942
) as well as more current studies (except Hedreen et al., 1984
; Kostovic, 1986
; Kracun and Rosner, 1986
; Ulfig, 1989
; Halliday et al., 1993
), a recent more detailed analysis of the NSP in 36 neurologically normal subjects ranging from 15 weeks of gestation to 71 years of age have revealed its precise location at all levels (Simic et al., 1999
) (Fig. 1). Moreover, at the most rostrolateral levels we have found the previously undescribed component of the lateral subdivision of the NSP (Simic et al., 1999
). This part of the NSP has not been described in non-human primates (Gorry, 1963
; Divac 1975
).
|
The obviously larger size of NSP on the left side at the most rostral and anterointermediate levels (Halliday et al., 1993
While there is a whole body of data for pathological changes of the main part of the basal nucleus, the pathology of NSP was not studied. Since it seems today that the most consistent determinant of pathology in Alzheimer's disease is the anatomical localization of a neuron, we are convinced that Ayala himself was far beyond his time when he believed that pathology of the NSP might differ significantly from pathology of the main part of the basal nucleus. To give honour to this remarkable author who was first to describe NSP, we suggest the eponym NSP of Ayala.
In conclusion, we recommend that the designation Ch4 p? in the article by Teipel et al. (2005
) should be replaced with the NSP (NSP of Ayala). Future studies on the basal forebrain should more carefully investigate this potentially very important part of the basal nucleus.
References
Ayala G. A hitherto undifferentiated nucleus in the forebrain (nucleus subputaminalis). Brain 1915; 37: 4338.
Brockhaus H. Vergleichend-anatomische Untersuchungen über den Basalkernkomplex. J Psychol Neurol 1942; 51: 5795.
Divac I. Magnocellular nuclei of the basal forebrain project to neocortex, brainstem and olfactory bulb. Review of some functional correlates. Brain Res 1975; 93: 38598.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gorry JD. Studies on the comparative anatomy of the ganglion basale of Meynert. Acta Anat (Basel) 1963; 55: 51104.[Web of Science][Medline]
Halliday GM, Cullen K, Cairns MJ. Quantitation and three-dimensional reconstruction of Ch4 nucleus in the human basal forebrain. Synapse 1993; 15: 116.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hedreen JC, Struble RG, Whitehouse PJ, Price DL. Topography of the magnocellular basal forebrain system in human brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1984; 43: 121.[Web of Science][Medline]
Heimer L. Basal forebrain in the context of schizophrenia. [Review]. Brain Res Rev 2000; 31: 20535.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kölliker A, editor. Handbuch der Gewebelehre des Menschen. Für Arzte und Studirende. Nervensystem des Menschen und der Thiere, Vol. 2. Leipzig: Engelmann; 1896.
Kostovic I. Prenatal development of nucleus basalis complex and related fiber systems in man: a histochemical study. Neuroscience 1986; 17: 104777.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kracun I, Rosner H. Early cytoarchitectonic development of the anlage of the basal nucleus of Meynert in the human fetus. Int J Dev Neurosci 1986; 4: 1439.[Medline]
Simic G, Mrzljak L, Fucic A, Winblad B, Lovric H, Kostovic I. Nucleus subputaminalis (Ayala): the still disregarded magnocellular component of the basal forebrain may be human specific and connected with the cortical speech area. Neuroscience 1999; 89: 7389.[Medline]
Teipel SJ, Flatz WH, Heinsen H, Bokde AL, Schoenberg SO, Stockel S, et al. Measurement of basal forebrain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease using MRI. Brain 2005; 128: 262644.
Ulfig N. Configuration of the magnocellular nuclei in the basal forebrain of the human adult. Acta Anat (Basel) 1989; 134: 1005.[Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
