Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KOPELMAN, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KOPELMAN, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 114A, No. 1, 117-137, 1991
© 1991 Oxford University Press

FRONTAL DYSFUNCTION AND MEMORY DEFICITS IN THE ALCOHOLIC KORSAKOFF SYNDROME AND ALZHEIMER-TYPE DEMENTIA

MICHAEL D. KOPELMAN

Academic Unit of Psychiatry, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals St Thomas's Campus, London, UK

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr Michael D. Kopelman, Academic Unit of Psychiatry, St Thomas's Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH

This study investigated the intercorrelation of 8 ‘frontal’ tests in 32 patients with Korsakoff s syndrome and Alzheimer's disease, and examined the relationship of frontal dysfunction to impaired release from proactive interference and impoverished retrieval from retrograde memory. Amongst the frontal tests, there were statistically significant intercorrelations between 3 ‘fluency’ tests and 3 ‘card-sorting’ tests, although the degree of shared variance was relatively low. The relationship of another test—picture arrangement errors-was more equivocal; performance for ‘cognitive estimates’ was unrelated to performance in the other frontal tests, possibly because it may reflect pathology at a different frontal site. There was no evidence in this study that variability in release from proactive interference was related to measures of frontal function in either patient group, and the conditions under which these patient groups fail to show ‘normal’ release appear to be tightly constrained. On the other hand, the defective retrieval of retrograde memories was correlated with frontal dysfunction in both patient groups. There was a suggestion of a double dissociation with a measure of nonverbal short-term forgetting, impairment at which was related to the degree of general cortical atrophy rather than frontal dysfunction. A stepwise regression equation based on 3 frontal tests could account for 64% of the variability in retrograde memory performance within the total patient group, 68.5% in the Korsakoff group and 57% in the Alzheimer group. By comparison, the severity of anterograde memory impairment predicted only 21 % of the variance in retrograde memory performance. It is concluded that frontal dysfunction produces a disorganization of retrieval processes which contributes to the temporally-extensive retrograde amnesia of these two disorders.

Received August 15, 1989. Revised January 9, 1990. Accepted January 12, 1990.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.