Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (72)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friederici, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kotz, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friederici, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kotz, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 122, No. 6, 1033-1047, June 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Language related brain potentials in patients with cortical and subcortical left hemisphere lesions

Angela D. Friederici, D. Yves von Cramon and Sonja A. Kotz

Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig

Correspondence to: Angela D. Friederici, Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Stephanstrasse 1a, PO Box 500355, D-04303 Leipzig, Germany E-mail: angelafr{at}cns.mpg.de

The role of the basal ganglia in language processing is currently a matter of discussion. Therefore, patients with left frontal cortical and subcortical lesions involving the basal ganglia as well as normal controls were tested in a language comprehension paradigm. Semantically incorrect, syntactically incorrect and correct sentences were presented auditorily. Subjects were required to listen to the sentences and to judge whether the sentence heard was correct or not. Event-related potentials and reaction times were recorded while subjects heard the sentences. Three different components correlated with different language processes were considered: the so-called N400 assumed to reflect processes of semantic integration; the early left anterior negativity hypothesized to reflect processes of initial syntactic structure building; and a late positivity (P600) taken to reflect second-pass processes including re-analysis and repair. Normal participants showed the expected N400 component for semantically incorrect sentences and an early anterior negativity followed by a P600 for syntactically incorrect sentences. Patients with left frontal cortical lesions displayed an attenuated N400 component in the semantic condition. In the syntactic condition only a late positivity was observed. Patients with lesions of the basal ganglia, in contrast, showed an N400 to semantic violations and an early anterior negativity as well as a P600 to syntactic violations, comparable to normal controls. Under the assumption that the early anterior negativity reflects automatic first-pass parsing processes and the P600 component more controlled second-pass parsing processes, the present results suggest that the left frontal cortex might support early parsing processes, and that specific regions of the basal ganglia, in contrast, may not be crucial for early parsing processes during sentence comprehension.

left hemisphere lesions; syntactic-semantic processing; event-related potentials; P600; N400

AAT = Aachen Aphasia Test; ANOVA = analysis of variance; BA = Brodmann area; ELAN = early left anterior negativity; EOG = electro-oculogram; ERP = event-related brain potential


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Teichmann, V. Gaura, J.-F. Demonet, F. Supiot, M. Delliaux, C. Verny, P. Renou, P. Remy, and A.-C. Bachoud-Levi
Language processing within the striatum: evidence from a PET correlation study in Huntington's disease
Brain, April 1, 2008; 131(4): 1046 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. E. Longworth, S. E. Keenan, R. A. Barker, W. D. Marslen-Wilson, and L. K. Tyler
The basal ganglia and rule-governed language use: evidence from vascular and degenerative conditions
Brain, March 1, 2005; 128(3): 584 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
C Sfagos, C C Papageorgiou, K K Kosma, E Kodopadelis, N K Uzunoglu, D Vassilopoulos, and A D Rabavilas
Working memory deficits in multiple sclerosis: a controlled study with auditory P600 correlates
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2003; 74(9): 1231 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Grossman, A. Cooke, C. DeVita, C. Lee, D. Alsop, J. Detre, J. Gee, W. Chen, M. B. Stern, and H. I. Hurtig
Grammatical and resource components of sentence processing in Parkinson's disease: An fMRI study
Neurology, March 11, 2003; 60(5): 775 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. D. Friederici, S.-A. Ruschemeyer, A. Hahne, and C. J. Fiebach
The Role of Left Inferior Frontal and Superior Temporal Cortex in Sentence Comprehension: Localizing Syntactic and Semantic Processes
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2003; 13(2): 170 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. D. Friederici, K. Steinhauer, and E. Pfeifer
Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis
PNAS, January 1, 2002; (2002) 12611199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
H. Pihan, E. Altenmuller, I. Hertrich, and H. Ackermann
Cortical activation patterns of affective speech processing depend on concurrent demands on the subvocal rehearsal system A DC-potential study
Brain, November 1, 2000; 123(11): 2338 - 2349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
J. C. Masdeu
Aphasia
Arch Neurol, June 1, 2000; 57(6): 892 - 895.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. D. Friederici, K. Steinhauer, and E. Pfeifer
From the Cover: Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis
PNAS, January 8, 2002; 99(1): 529 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.