Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiskrantz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Barbur, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiskrantz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Barbur, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 122, No. 8, 1533-1538, August 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Differential pupillary constriction and awareness in the absence of striate cortex

L. Weiskrantz1, A. Cowey1 and J. L. Barbur2

1 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford and 2 Applied Vision Research Centre,City University, London, UK

Correspondence to: Professor L. Weiskrantz, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK

The fact that the pupil constricts differentially to visual stimuli in the absence of changes in light energy makes it a valuable tool for studying normal function as well as residual capacity in hemianopic subjects. When pupillometrically effective stimuli such as equiluminant gratings or coloured patches with an abrupt onset and offset are presented to the `blind' hemifield, a hemianopic subject with damage largely restricted to striate cortex (V1) sometimes reports being `aware' of the transient onset/offset, although without `seeing' as such. The question addressed here is whether the pupil still responds in the condition of blindsight in its strict sense—i.e. discriminative capacity in the absence of acknowledged awareness—when stimuli are deliberately designed to eliminate awareness. This was accomplished by making stimulus onset and offset slow and gradual. The results with a well-studied hemianope, G.Y., demonstrate that there is still a pupillary constriction to isoluminant achromatic gratings and red-coloured stimuli, although reduced in size, in the absence of acknowledged awareness.

pupillometry; visual cortex; blindsight; residual vision; visual awareness


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
B. J. Wilhelm, H. Wilhelm, S. Moro, and J. L. Barbur
Pupil response components: studies in patients with Parinaud's syndrome
Brain, October 1, 2002; 125(10): 2296 - 2307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P. Stoerig, A. Zontanou, and A. Cowey
Aware or Unaware: Assessment of Cortical Blindness in Four Men and a Monkey
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2002; 12(6): 565 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. L. Barbur, L. Weiskrantz, and J. A. Harlow
The unseen color aftereffect of an unseen stimulus: Insight from blindsight into mechanisms of color afterimages
PNAS, September 28, 1999; 96(20): 11637 - 11641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.