Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (83)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tfelt-Hansen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Goadsby, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tfelt-Hansen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Goadsby, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 123, No. 1, 9-18, January 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press


Review Article

Ergotamine in the acute treatment of migraine

A review and European consensus

P. Tfelt-Hansen1, P. R. Saxena2, C. Dahlöf4, J. Pascual5, M. Láinez6, P. Henry7, H.-C. Diener8, J. Schoenen9, M. D. Ferrari3 and P. J. Goadsby10

1 Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2 Department of Pharmacology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, 3 Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands, 4 Gothenburg Migraine Clinic, Göteborg, Sweden, 5 Service of Neurology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, 6 Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain, 7 CHU Hospital Pellegrin Service de Neurologie, Bordeaux, France, 8 Neurologische Klinik and Poliklinik, University of Essen, Germany, 9 Departments of Neurology and Neuroanatomy, University of Liege, Belgium, 10 The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK

Correspondence to: Professor Peter J. Goadsby, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK E-mail: peterg{at}brain.ion.ucl.ac.uk

Ergotamine has been used in clinical practice for the acute treatment of migraine for over 50 years, but there has been little agreement on its place in clinical practice. An expert group from Europe reviewed the pre-clinical and clinical data on ergotamine as it relates to the treatment of migraine. From this review, specific suggestions for the patient groups and appropriate use of ergotamine have been agreed. In essence, ergotamine, from a medical perspective, is the drug of choice in a limited number of migraine sufferers who have infrequent or long duration headaches and are likely to comply with dosing restrictions. For most migraine sufferers requiring a specific anti-migraine treatment, a triptan is generally a better option from both an efficacy and side-effect perspective.

migraine; headache; acute treatment; serotonin pharmacology; 5-HT IB/1D receptors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
E. A. Wammes-van der Heijden, H. Rahimtoola, H.G.M. Leufkens, C. C. Tijssen, and A. C.G. Egberts
Risk of ischemic complications related to the intensity of triptan and ergotamine use.
Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1128 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
P. J. Goadsby
Advances in the understanding of headache
Br. Med. Bull., October 5, 2005; 73-74(1): 83 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
C. Waeber and M. A. Moskowitz
Therapeutic implications of central and peripheral neurologic mechanisms in migraine
Neurology, October 28, 2003; 61(90084): S9 - 20.
[Full Text]


Home page
CMAJHome page
E. Wooltorton
Risk of stroke, gangrene from ergot drug interactions
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 15, 2003; 168(8): 1015 - 1015.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. J. Goadsby, R. B. Lipton, and M. D. Ferrari
Migraine -- Current Understanding and Treatment
N. Engl. J. Med., January 24, 2002; 346(4): 257 - 270.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.