Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Haque, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Haque, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 123, No. 5, 1007-1016, May 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Auditory evoked potentials to spectro-temporal modulation of complex tones in normal subjects and patients with severe brain injury

S. J. Jones1, M. Vaz Pato1, L. Sprague1, M. Stokes2, R. Munday3 and N. Haque2

1 Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and 2 Research Department and 3 Occupational Therapy Department, The Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, London, UK

Correspondence to: Dr S. J. Jones, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK E-mail: sjjones{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk

In order to assess higher auditory processing capabilities, long-latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) were recorded to synthesized musical instrument tones in 22 post-comatose patients with severe brain injury causing variably attenuated behavioural responsiveness. On the basis of normative studies, three different types of spectro-temporal modulation were employed. When a continuous `clarinet' tone changes pitch once every few seconds, N1/P2 potentials are evoked at latencies of ~90 and 180 ms, respectively. Their distribution in the fronto-central region is consistent with generators in the supratemporal cortex of both hemispheres. When the pitch is modulated at a much faster rate (~16 changes/s), responses to each change are virtually abolished but potentials with similar distribution are still elicited by changing the timbre (e.g. `clarinet' to `oboe') every few seconds. These responses appear to represent the cortical processes concerned with spectral pattern analysis and the grouping of frequency components to form sound `objects'. Following a period of 16/s oscillation between two pitches, a more anteriorly distributed negativity is evoked on resumption of a steady pitch. Various lines of evidence suggest that this is probably equivalent to the `mismatch negativity' (MMN), reflecting a pre-perceptual, memory-based process for detection of change in spectro-temporal sound patterns. This method requires no off-line subtraction of AEPs evoked by the onset of a tone, and the MMN is produced rapidly and robustly with considerably larger amplitude (usually >5 µV) than that to discontinuous pure tones. In the brain-injured patients, the presence of AEPs to two or more complex tone stimuli (in the combined assessment of two authors who were `blind' to the clinical and behavioural data) was significantly associated with the demonstrable possession of discriminative hearing (the ability to respond differentially to verbal commands, in the assessment of a further author who was blind to the AEP findings). Behavioural and electrophysiological findings were in accordance in 18/22 patients, but no AEPs could be recorded in two patients who had clear behavioural evidence of discriminative hearing. The absence of long-latency AEPs should not, therefore, be considered indicative of complete functional deafness. Conversely, AEPs were substantially preserved in two patients without behavioural evidence of discriminative hearing. Although not necessarily indicative of conscious `awareness', such AEP preservation might help to identify sentient patients who are prevented by severe motor disability from communicating their perception.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
S. C. Cramer, L. Lastra, M. G. Lacourse, and M. J. Cohen
Brain motor system function after chronic, complete spinal cord injury
Brain, December 1, 2005; 128(12): 2941 - 2950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S J Jones, L Sprague, and M Vaz Pato
Electrophysiological evidence for a defect in the processing of temporal sound patterns in multiple sclerosis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2002; 73(5): 561 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
B. Kotchoubey, S. Lang, V. Bostanov, and N. Birbaumer
Is there a Mind? Electrophysiology of Unconscious Patients
Physiology, February 1, 2002; 17(1): 38 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.