Brain, Vol. 124, No. 9, 1832-1840,
September 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Evidence for subcortical involvement in the visual control of human reaching
1 MRC Human Movement Group and 2 Sobell Departmentof Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology, London, UK
Correspondence to:
Brian L. Day, MRC Human Movement Group, Sobell Department of Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK E-mail: b.day{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk
To test whether the most rapid visually evoked reach adjustments are cortically organized in humans, we have measured their latency in a healthy subject with complete agenesis of the corpus callosum. This condition precludes direct communication between left and right cerebral cortices and so, in this subject, a purely cortical visuomotor process would be expected to produce longer-latency responses to a target that appears in the visual hemifield contralateral to the responding limb (crossed) compared with the ipsilateral hemifield (uncrossed). As predicted, when performing simple reaction time tasks that involved lifting a finger or an arm in response to a visual stimulus presented to either hemifield, this acallosal subject showed a significant crossed–uncrossed latency difference (mean 35.8 ms) that was not present in control subjects (group mean 2.2 ms). In contrast, when she reached for a target that unexpectedly jumped into either visual hemifield, the latencies of mid-flight adjustment were the same (~120 ms) irrespective of either the target jump direction or which hand was used. This was not due to an early movement of the eyes bringing the target back on to the fovea since this subject's finger always deviated towards the new target position in advance of her eyes. Neither could it be explained by the use of ipsilateral corticospinal projections since transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex failed to evoke ipsilateral responses in arm or hand muscles. These results suggest that, even in humans, subcortical structures are involved in the fastest adjustments of the reaching arm made in response to fresh visual information. An additional finding in this subject was that, when reaching, the eye saccadic latency was greater by 36 ms on average when the target jumped right compared with left, irrespective of which hand was being used. This is the same value as the mean interhemispheric transfer time obtained in the simple reaction time tasks and may indicate right-hemispheric dominance for saccadic eye movement control.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Reichenbach, A. Thielscher, A. Peer, H. H. Bülthoff, and J.-P. Bresciani Seeing the hand while reaching speeds up on-line responses to a sudden change in target position J. Physiol., October 1, 2009; 587(19): 4605 - 4616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Gritsenko, S. Yakovenko, and J. F. Kalaska Integration of Predictive Feedforward and Sensory Feedback Signals for Online Control of Visually Guided Movement J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 914 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Mutha and B. Shabbott Don't Let It Slip: Predictive Control of Grip Force After Changes in Task Goals J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 2965 - 2966. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S. Christensen, L. Kristiansen, J. B. Rowe, and J. B. Nielsen Action-blindsight in healthy subjects after transcranial magnetic stimulation PNAS, January 29, 2008; 105(4): 1353 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Danion and F. R. Sarlegna Can the Human Brain Predict the Consequences of Arm Movement Corrections When Transporting an Object? Hints from Grip Force Adjustments J. Neurosci., November 21, 2007; 27(47): 12839 - 12843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Moraes, F. Allard, and A. E. Patla Validating Determinants for an Alternate Foot Placement Selection Algorithm During Human Locomotion in Cluttered Terrain J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 1928 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. F. Reynolds and B. L. Day Fast visuomotor processing made faster by sound J. Physiol., September 15, 2007; 583(3): 1107 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lakie and I. D. Loram Manually controlled human balancing using visual, vestibular and proprioceptive senses involves a common, low frequency neural process J. Physiol., November 15, 2006; 577(1): 403 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Desmurget, V. Gaveau, P. Vindras, R. S. Turner, E. Broussolle, and S. Thobois On-line motor control in patients with Parkinson's disease Brain, August 1, 2004; 127(8): 1755 - 1773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-H. Courjon, E. Olivier, and D. Pelisson Direct evidence for the contribution of the superior colliculus in the control of visually guided reaching movements in the cat J. Physiol., May 1, 2004; 556(3): 675 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. E. Criscimagna-Hemminger, O. Donchin, M. S. Gazzaniga, and R. Shadmehr Learned Dynamics of Reaching Movements Generalize From Dominant to Nondominant Arm J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 168 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Lebedev and S. P. Wise Insights into seeing and grasping: distinguishing the neural correlates of perception and action. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, June 1, 2002; 1(2): 108 - 129. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|