Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwenkreis, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schöls, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwenkreis, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schöls, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 125, No. 2, 301-309, February 1, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Motor cortex activation by transcranial magnetic stimulation in ataxia patients depends on the genetic defect

Peter Schwenkreis1, Martin Tegenthoff1, Katja Witscher1, Christian Börnke2, Horst Przuntek2, Jean-Pierre Malin1 and Ludger Schöls2

1 Departments of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG-Kliniken Bergmannsheil and 2 St Josef Hospital, Bochum, Germany

Correspondence to: Martin Tegenthoff, MD, BG-Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Department of Neurology, Buerkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, D-44789 Bochum, Germany E-mail: Martin.Tegenthoff{at}ruhr-uni-bochum.de

In patients with degenerative ataxia, various abnormalities in motor cortex activation by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been observed, including a reduction of intracortical facilitation and a lengthening of the silent period. However, the groups of patients examined in previous studies were heterogeneous, involving patients with autosomal-dominant and idiopathic cerebellar ataxia, and showing different clinical features. The aim of our present study was to investigate whether differences in motor cortex activation by TMS could be observed in genetically defined subtypes of degenerative ataxia. We examined six patients with Friedreich’s ataxia, three patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) type 1, seven patients with SCA2, 12 patients with SCA3, nine patients with SCA6 and 14 healthy controls. In all subjects, motor threshold, central motor conduction time, cortical silent period after TMS, and intracortical inhibition and facilitation (as assessed by TMS using a paired pulses paradigm) were determined. Additionally, F wave amplitudes evoked by electrical peripheral nerve stimulation were measured. We found a significant reduction of intracortical facilitation in SCA2 and SCA3 patients. Furthermore, motor threshold was elevated in SCA1, central motor conduction time was lengthened in patients with Friedreich’s ataxia and SCA1, and F wave amplitudes were enlarged in all the genetic subgroups except for SCA6. Silent period and intracortical inhibition did not differ between patients and controls. We conclude that changes of intracortical facilitation induced by TMS and other excitability parameters of the motor system are not a common phenomenon in degenerative ataxia, but are restricted to specific subtypes. This points to differences in the underlying pathophysiological processes in genetic subtypes of ataxia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. C. Pellicciari, D. Veniero, C. Marzano, F. Moroni, C. Pirulli, G. Curcio, M. Ferrara, C. Miniussi, P. M. Rossini, and L. De Gennaro
Heritability of Intracortical Inhibition and Facilitation
J. Neurosci., July 15, 2009; 29(28): 8897 - 8900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
R. E. Frye, A. Rotenberg, M. Ousley, and A. Pascual-Leone
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Child Neurology: Current and Future Directions
J Child Neurol, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 79 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. F. Molnar, A. Sailer, C. A. Gunraj, D. I. Cunic, A. E. Lang, A. M. Lozano, E. Moro, and R. Chen
Changes in cortical excitability with thalamic deep brain stimulation
Neurology, June 14, 2005; 64(11): 1913 - 1919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Liepert, T. Kucinski, O. Tuscher, F. Pawlas, T. Baumer, and C. Weiller
Motor Cortex Excitability After Cerebellar Infarction
Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2484 - 2488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
C. Civardi, R. Vicentini, G. Grugni, and R. Cantello
Corticospinal Physiology in Patients With Prader-Willi Syndrome: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study
Arch Neurol, October 1, 2004; 61(10): 1585 - 1589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. Schwenkreis, F. Janssen, O. Rommel, B. Pleger, B. Volker, I. Hosbach, R. Dertwinkel, C. Maier, and M. Tegenthoff
Bilateral motor cortex disinhibition in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I of the hand
Neurology, August 26, 2003; 61(4): 515 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.