Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calancie, B.
Right arrow Articles by Broton, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calancie, B.
Right arrow Articles by Broton, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 125, No. 5, 1150-1161, May 2002
© 2002 Guarantors of Brain

Interlimb reflexes and synaptic plasticity become evident months after human spinal cord injury

Blair Calancie1, Maria R. Molano1 and James G. Broton1

1 The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA

Correspondence to: Blair Calancie, PhD, Department of Neurosurgery, SUNY’s Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, IHP Room 1213, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA E-mail: calancib{at}upstate.edu

Persons with long-standing injury to the cervical spinal cord resulting in complete or partial paralysis typically develop a wide spectrum of involuntary movements in muscles receiving innervation caudal to the level of injury. We have previously shown that these movements include brief and discrete contraction of muscles in the hand and forearm in response to innocuous sensory stimulation to the feet and legs, but we have been unable to replicate these interlimb reflexes in able- bodied subjects. Properties of these muscle responses indicate that the synaptic contacts between ascending sensory fibres and motor neurones of the cervical enlargement are more efficacious than normal. If these connections are present at all times, and require the more rostrally-placed spinal cord injury to allow their emergence, one might expect their appearance relatively soon following injury, as has been shown for studies of ‘latent’ synapses. Conversely, delayed appearance of these interlimb reflexes would suggest either the development of new synaptic connections or a profound strengthening of existing circuits in the cervical spinal cord due to a combination of afferent target loss and motor neurone denervation from motor tracts originating rostral to the injury site. In this study, we used repeated examinations of persons with acute injury to the cervical spinal cord to examine the time post-injury at which interlimb reflexes are first seen. Using tibial nerve stimulation at the knee as a screening test, a total of 24 subjects were found to develop interlimb reflexes following spinal cord injury. Latencies between stimulation and EMG were as brief as 32 ms for muscles of the forearm and 44 ms for muscles in the hand. These minimal delays all but rule out a supraspinal route for these interlimb reflexes. Interlimb reflexes first became evident no sooner than ~6 months following injury, and in some individuals were not seen until well over 1 year post-injury. Enhanced lower limb segmental excitability had emerged in nearly all of these subjects weeks or months prior to the first appearance of interlimb reflexes, arguing against a manifestation of traditional post-traumatic spasticity as a basis for this activity. This prolonged delay between time of injury and emergence of interlimb reflex activity lends support to the hypothesis that this activity represents an example of plasticity—and perhaps ‘regenerative sprouting’—in the human spinal cord following traumatic injury.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Gerasimenko, P. Musienko, I. Bogacheva, T. Moshonkina, A. Savochin, I. Lavrov, R. R. Roy, and V. R. Edgerton
Propriospinal Bypass of the Serotonergic System That Can Facilitate Stepping
J. Neurosci., April 29, 2009; 29(17): 5681 - 5689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Kawashima, D. Nozaki, M. O. Abe, and K. Nakazawa
Shaping Appropriate Locomotive Motor Output Through Interlimb Neural Pathway Within Spinal Cord in Humans
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2946 - 2955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
T. G. Hornby, J. H. Kahn, M. Wu, and B. D. Schmit
Temporal facilitation of spastic stretch reflexes following human spinal cord injury
J. Physiol., March 15, 2006; 571(3): 593 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. K. Floeter, P. Zhai, R. Saigal, Y. Kim, and J. Statland
Motor Neuron Firing Dysfunction in Spastic Patients With Primary Lateral Sclerosis
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 919 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. Grasso, Y. P. Ivanenko, M. Zago, M. Molinari, G. Scivoletto, V. Castellano, V. Macellari, and F. Lacquaniti
Distributed plasticity of locomotor pattern generators in spinal cord injured patients
Brain, May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1019 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Frigon, D. F. Collins, and E. P. Zehr
Effect of Rhythmic Arm Movement on Reflexes in the Legs: Modulation of Soleus H-Reflexes and Somatosensory Conditioning
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1516 - 1523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Zijdewind and C. K. Thomas
Motor Unit Firing During and After Voluntary Contractions of Human Thenar Muscles Weakened by Spinal Cord Injury
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 2065 - 2071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.