Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jahn, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jahn, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 125, No. 9, 2005-2011, September 2002
© 2002 Guarantors of Brain

Suppression of eye movements improves balance

Klaus Jahn0, Michael Strupp0, Siegbert Krafczyk0, Olaf Schüler0, Stefan Glasauer0 and Thomas Brandt0

0 Department of Neurology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany

Correspondence to: Michael Strupp, MD, University of Munich, Department of Neurology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany E-mail: kjahn{at}nefo.med.uni-muenchen.de

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible interaction of vestibulo-ocular and vestibulo-spinal functions. Spontaneous eye movements and anterior–posterior and lateral body sway were recorded simultaneously in 10 patients with vestibular neuritis (Experiment 1) and in 11 healthy subjects (Experiment 2) while all subjects wore a mask that allowed fixation of a head-fixed target. For the healthy subjects, there was no significant difference in postural sway for the conditions of eyes open in darkness and fixation of the head-fixed target. For the patients, the question was whether transient suppression of the spontaneous nystagmus by fixating the target affected excessive body sway or whether modulation of nystagmus and postural sway were largely independent. The mean peak slow-phase velocity of the spontaneous nystagmus decreased from 13.5 ± 5.6 to 4.3 ± 2.4°/s during fixation. The suppression of nystagmus also reduced postural sway while standing on foam rubber. Mean value decreased from 25.2 ± 7.6 to 16.2 ± 7.7 mm (right–left root mean square values; ANOVA, P = 0.003). Since a head-fixed target was used to suppress spontaneous eye movements, the data cannot be explained by any stabilizing effect of afferent visual cues. Instead, ocular motor efference copy signals or reafferences may have contributed to the postural instability of patients with vestibular neuritis, which would explain the reduction of postural sway during fixation suppression of the nystagmus. Thus, ocular motor signals rather than afferent visual cues about retinal slip are used for visual control of postural sway, at least in this experimental paradigm.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y.-Y. Huang, O. Rinner, P. Hedinger, S.-C. Liu, and S. C. F. Neuhauss
Oculomotor Instabilities in Zebrafish Mutant belladonna: A Behavioral Model for Congenital Nystagmus Caused by Axonal Misrouting
J. Neurosci., September 27, 2006; 26(39): 9873 - 9880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. Glasauer, E. Schneider, K. Jahn, M. Strupp, and T. Brandt
How the eyes move the body
Neurology, October 25, 2005; 65(8): 1291 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.