Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (59)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bjoertomt, O.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bjoertomt, O.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 125, No. 9, 2012-2022, September 2002
© 2002 Guarantors of Brain

Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Otto Bjoertomt0, Alan Cowey0 and Vincent Walsh0

0 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Correspondence to: Otto Bjoertomt, Department of Experimental Psychology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK E-mail: otto.bjoertomt{at}psy.ox.ac.uk

Localized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to disrupt visuospatial perception in the near and far space of six healthy volunteer subjects. In addition to the baseline condition, they were stimulated over the right posterior parietal cortex, the right or left dorsal occipital cortex or the right ventral occipital cortex, during the brief presentation of a transected horizontal line. Subjects had to indicate whether the part of the line to the left or right of the transection appeared longer. The stimulus display was back-projected on a screen at a viewing distance of either 50 or 150 cm (‘near’ and ‘far’ space, respectively). Reaction times and choices were measured. In a forced-choice paradigm, subjects showed ‘pseudoneglect’, the natural tendency of neurologically intact subjects to perceive the left side of a centrally transected line as slightly longer than the right. These errors occurred more for lines in near space than for lines in far space. Magnetic stimulation of the right posterior parietal cortex or the right ventral occipital lobe selectively induced a significant shift to the right in the perceived midpoint for near- and far-space lines, respectively. The results reproduced in normal subjects the dissociation between neglect in near and far space that has been described in patients with different right-hemisphere lesions. This dissociation supports the contention that there is a dorsal/near space–ventral/far space segregation of processing in the visual system which reflects the behavioural goals of the two putative visual streams.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
R. Sparing, M. Thimm, M. D. Hesse, J. Kust, H. Karbe, and G. R. Fink
Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation
Brain, November 1, 2009; 132(11): 3011 - 3020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D. Bueti and V. Walsh
The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes
Phil Trans R Soc B, July 12, 2009; 364(1525): 1831 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. Babiloni, F. Vecchio, S. Rossi, A. De Capua, S. Bartalini, M. Ulivelli, and P. M. Rossini
Human Ventral Parietal Cortex Plays a Functional Role on Visuospatial Attention and Primary Consciousness. A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1486 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Hung, J. Driver, and V. Walsh
Visual Selection and Posterior Parietal Cortex: Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Partial Report Analyzed by Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention
J. Neurosci., October 19, 2005; 25(42): 9602 - 9612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
A. Cowey
The Ferrier Lecture 2004 What can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works?
Phil Trans R Soc B, June 29, 2005; 360(1458): 1185 - 1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
G. Thut, A. Nietzel, and A. Pascual-Leone
Dorsal Posterior Parietal rTMS Affects Voluntary Orienting of Visuospatial Attention
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2005; 15(5): 628 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Ellison, I. Schindler, L. L. Pattison, and A. D. Milner
An exploration of the role of the superior temporal gyrus in visual search and spatial perception using TMS
Brain, October 1, 2004; 127(10): 2307 - 2315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
Q. Yang and Z. Kapoula
TMS over the Left Posterior Parietal Cortex Prolongs Latency of Contralateral Saccades and Convergence
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 2231 - 2239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. Han, Y. Jiang, H. Gu, H. Rao, L. Mao, Y. Cui, and R. Zhai
The role of human parietal cortex in attention networks
Brain, March 1, 2004; 127(3): 650 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.