Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lausberg, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ptito, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lausberg, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ptito, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 126, No. 2, 343-360, February 2003
© 2003 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awg042

Pantomime to visual presentation of objects: left hand dyspraxia in patients with complete callosotomy

Hedda Lausberg3,4, Robyn F. Cruz1, Sotaro Kita4, Eran Zaidel2 and Alain Ptito5

1 Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, 2 Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, USA, 3 Department of Neurology, Free University of Berlin, Germany, 4 Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands and 5 Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Canada

Correspondence to: Dr. Hedda Lausberg, Department of Neurology, Free University of Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12200 Berlin, Germany E-mail: hedda{at}zedat.fu-berlin.de

Investigations of left hand praxis in imitation and object use in patients with callosal disconnection have yielded divergent results, inducing a debate between two theoretical positions. Whereas Liepmann suggested that the left hemisphere is motor dominant, others maintain that both hemispheres have equal motor competences and propose that left hand apraxia in patients with callosal disconnection is secondary to left hemispheric specialization for language or other task modalities. The present study aims to gain further insight into the motor competence of the right hemisphere by investigating pantomime of object use in split-brain patients. Three patients with complete callosotomy and, as control groups, five patients with partial callosotomy and nine healthy subjects were examined for their ability to pantomime object use to visual object presentation and demonstrate object manipulation. In each condition, 11 objects were presented to the subjects who pantomimed or demonstrated the object use with either hand. In addition, six object pairs were presented to test bimanual coordination. Two independent raters evaluated the videotaped movement demonstrations. While object use demonstrations were perfect in all three groups, the split-brain patients displayed apraxic errors only with their left hands in the pantomime condition. The movement analysis of concept and execution errors included the examination of ipsilateral versus contralateral motor control. As the right hand/left hemisphere performances demonstrated retrieval of the correct movement concepts, concept errors by the left hand were taken as evidence for right hemisphere control. Several types of execution errors reflected a lack of distal motor control indicating the use of ipsilateral pathways. While one split-brain patient controlled his left hand predominantly by ipsilateral pathways in the pantomime condition, the error profile in the other two split-brain patients suggested that the right hemisphere controlled their left hands. In the object use condition, in all three split-brain patients fine-graded distal movements in the left hand indicated right hemispheric control. Our data show left hand apraxia in split-brain patients is not limited to verbal commands, but also occurs in pantomime to visual presentation of objects. As the demonstration with object in hand was unimpaired in either hand, both hemispheres must contain movement concepts for object use. However, the disconnected right hemisphere is impaired in retrieving the movement concept in response to visual object presentation, presumably because of a deficit in associating perceptual object representation with the movement concepts.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. A. Wheaton
Parietal Representations for Hand-Object Interactions
J. Neurosci., January 31, 2007; 27(5): 969 - 970.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
Y. Terao, T. Furubayashi, S. Okabe, N. Arai, H. Mochizuki, S. Kobayashi, M. Yumoto, M. Nishikawa, N. K. Iwata, and Y. Ugawa
Interhemispheric Transmission of Visuomotor Information for Motor Implementation
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2005; 15(7): 1025 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
S. H. Frey, M. G. Funnell, V. E. Gerry, and M. S. Gazzaniga
A Dissociation between the Representation of Tool-use Skills and Hand Dominance: Insights from Left- and Right-handed Callosotomy Patients
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2005; 17(2): 262 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.