Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, E.
Right arrow Articles by Halliday, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, E.
Right arrow Articles by Halliday, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 126, No. 4, 827-840, April 2003
© 2003 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awg085

Severity of gliosis in Pick’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: tau-positive glia differentiate these disorders

Emma Schofield1, Cindy Kersaitis2,3, Claire E. Shepherd1,2, Jillian J. Kril2 and Glenda M. Halliday1

1 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute and University of New South Wales, 2 Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, University of Sydney, Concord Hospital and 3 University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Correspondence to: A/Prof. Glenda Halliday, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney 2031, NSW, Australia E-mail: g.halliday{at}unsw.edu.au

Frontotemporal dementia is a term used to characterize diverse neuropathological conditions that can present with the same clinical phenotype. Five different neuropathologies underlie this disorder. However, consistent frontal and/or temporal neuronal loss and gliosis characterize all cases, the majority having no obvious pathological inclusions. Because neuronal loss and gliosis are consistent features across all cases, the present study aimed to determine the relationship between neuronal loss, gliosis and, for cases with abnormal tau inclusions, intracellular tau deposition. Formalin-fixed brain specimens from sporadic cases with frontotemporal dementia (eight with tau-positive Pick bodies, five with frontotemporal lobar degeneration without inclusions) were compared with those from non-diseased controls (n = 5). Brain specimens were cut into 3 mm coronal slices for evaluation and tissue samples from the superior frontal gyrus were taken for microscopic analysis. Immuno histochemistry for glia-specific proteins (astrocytic glial fibrillary acidic protein and microglial major histocompatibility complex II) and different tau epitopes was performed on 50 µm free-floating sections. Gross patterns of brain atrophy were analysed and upper and lower layer pyramidal neurons and glial cell numbers were quantified. A disease severity scheme was devised using the degree of gross macroscopic frontal and temporal atrophy to establish the relationship between the gliosis and neurodegeneration. In this small sample, the patterns of gross atrophy could be grouped reliably into four stages of severity. These stages were the same across disease groups and correlated with volume- corrected pyramidal neuron densities. In cases with Pick bodies, disease stage also correlated with duration, providing further evidence that these stages represent the progression of degeneration in this limited sample. Whereas there were, on average, many more reactive astrocytes in the cases with Pick bodies than in those with frontotemporal lobar atrophy, there was significant overlap between cases in the degree of astrocytosis. However, a large proportion of the astrocytes in Pick’s disease displayed phosphorylated tau immunoreactivity, whereas no tau-positive astrocytes were found in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. The pattern and degree of microglia activation were similar in all the dementia cases analysed, with considerably more activated microglia accumulating in white matter. In this small sample, the abundance of white matter microglia at early disease stages suggests a prominent role for this cell type in the neurodegenerative process. In frontotemporal lobar degeneration, a significant proportion of the activated white matter microglia were tau-2-immunoreactive, suggesting direct involvement in axonal degeneration, possibly via immune processes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
A.-T. Du, N. Schuff, J. H. Kramer, H. J. Rosen, M. L. Gorno-Tempini, K. Rankin, B. L. Miller, and M. W. Weiner
Different regional patterns of cortical thinning in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia
Brain, April 1, 2007; 130(4): 1159 - 1166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
B. Borroni, S. M. Brambati, C. Agosti, S. Gipponi, G. Bellelli, R. Gasparotti, V. Garibotto, M. Di Luca, P. Scifo, D. Perani, et al.
Evidence of White Matter Changes on Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Frontotemporal Dementia
Arch Neurol, February 1, 2007; 64(2): 246 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Padovani, B Borroni, S M Brambati, C Agosti, M Broli, R Alonso, P Scifo, G Bellelli, A Alberici, R Gasparotti, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging and voxel based morphometry study in early progressive supranuclear palsy
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2006; 77(4): 457 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. R. Davies, J. R. Hodges, J. J. Kril, K. Patterson, G. M. Halliday, and J. H. Xuereb
The pathological basis of semantic dementia
Brain, September 1, 2005; 128(9): 1984 - 1995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Broe, J. Kril, and G. M. Halliday
Astrocytic degeneration relates to the severity of disease in frontotemporal dementia
Brain, October 1, 2004; 127(10): 2214 - 2220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.