Brain, Vol. 126, No. 5, 1068-1078,
May 2003
© 2003 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awg106
Comparison of the pain suppressive effects of clinical and experimental painful conditioning stimuli
1 INSERM E-332 Centre d‘Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt and 2 Laboratoire d’Exploration Fonctionnelle, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
Correspondence to: Didier Bouhassira MD, PhD, INSERM E-332 Centre d’Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, 9 avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne, France E-mail: didier.bouhassira{at}apr.ap-hop-paris.fr
Studies in healthy volunteers suggested that the classical counterirritation phenomenon (i.e. pain inhibits pain effect) might depend on diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC), which modulate the spinal transmission of nociceptive signals. In the present study, we sought to determine whether similar mechanisms were at play in patients with different subtypes of neuropathic pain. Ten patients presenting with a traumatic peripheral nerve injury associated with dynamic mechano-allodynia (i.e. pain triggered by brushing) or static mechano-allodynia (i.e. pain triggered by light pressure stimuli) were included in this study. To investigate counterirritation mechanisms in these patients, we analysed the RIII nociceptive flexion reflex and concomitant painful sensation elicited by electrical stimulation of the sural nerve. We compared the effects of heterotopic ‘clinical’ conditioning stimuli (i.e. pain evoked by brushing or pressure within the allodynic area located in the upper limb or chest) to those of experimental heterotopic noxious stimuli (HNCS) consisting of a cold pressor test or tourniquet test applied to the normal upper limb. Static mechano-allodynia induced inhibitions of both the RIII reflex and the concomitant painful sensation. These effects were similar to those induced by HNCS and were probably due to an increased activation of DNIC. In contrast, in patients with dynamic allodynia, brushing within the allodynic area reduced the pain sensation at the foot, but did not inhibit the electrophysiological responses, suggesting that in this case the counterirritation effect may take place at the supraspinal level. Thus, the mechanisms of counterirritation are not univocal, but depend on the pathophysiological mechanisms of clinical pain.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Piche, M. Arsenault, and P. Rainville Cerebral and Cerebrospinal Processes Underlying Counterirritation Analgesia J. Neurosci., November 11, 2009; 29(45): 14236 - 14246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Hashmi and K. D. Davis Effect of Static and Dynamic Heat Pain Stimulus Profiles on the Temporal Dynamics and Interdependence of Pain Qualities, Intensity, and Affect J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 1706 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Benoliel, J. Epstein, E. Eliav, R. Jurevic, and S. Elad Orofacial Pain in Cancer: Part I--Mechanisms Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 2007; 86(6): 491 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C H Wilder-Smith, D Schindler, K Lovblad, S M Redmond, and A Nirkko Brain functional magnetic resonance imaging of rectal pain and activation of endogenous inhibitory mechanisms in irritable bowel syndrome patient subgroups and healthy controls Gut, November 1, 2004; 53(11): 1595 - 1601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Coffin, D Bouhassira, J-M Sabate, L Barbe, and R Jian Alteration of the spinal modulation of nociceptive processing in patients with irritable bowel syndrome Gut, October 1, 2004; 53(10): 1465 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|