Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tegeder, I.
Right arrow Articles by Lötsch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tegeder, I.
Right arrow Articles by Lötsch, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 126, No. 5, 1092-1102, May 2003
© 2003 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awg115

Peripheral opioid analgesia in experimental human pain models

Irmgard Tegeder, Silke Meier, Maria Burian, Helmut Schmidt, Gerd Geisslinger and Jörn Lötsch

Pharmazentrum Frankfurt, Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Correspondence to: Irmgard Tegeder, MD, pharmazentrum frankfurt, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany E-mail: tegeder{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de

This placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study assessed whether exclusive activation of peripheral opioid receptors results in significant pain reduction. To achieve opioid activity restricted to the periphery, we used a short-term (2 h) low dose infusion of morphine-6-ß-glucuronide (M6G) because M6G does not pass the blood–brain barrier during this time in amounts sufficient to induce CNS effects. The lack of central opioid effects of M6G was confirmed by a lack of change of the pupil size and absence of other opioid-related CNS effects. As a positive control, morphine was infused at a dosage that definitely produced CNS effects. This was evident by a rapid decrease of the pupil size and by other typical opioid-related side effects including nausea, vomiting, itchiness, hiccup and sedation. Three different pain models were employed to evaluate the analgesic effects: (i) cutaneous inflammatory hyperalgesia induced by briefly freezing a small skin area to –30°C (‘freeze lesion’); (ii) muscle hyperalgesia induced by a series of concentric and eccentric muscle contractions (DOMS model; delayed onset of muscle soreness); and (iii) pain induced by electrical current (5 Hz sinus stimuli of 0–10 mA). M6G significantly reduced cutaneous hyperalgesia in the ‘freeze lesion’ model as assessed with von Frey hairs. It also reduced muscle hyperalgesia in the DOMS model. Electrical pain, however, was not affected by M6G. Morphine was significantly more active in the ‘freeze lesion’ and DOMS model, and also significantly increased the electrical pain threshold and tolerance. Subcutaneous tissue concentrations of M6G and morphine as assessed with microdialysis were about half those of the respective plasma concentrations. The results of the study indicate that M6G has antihyperalgesic effects in inflammatory pain through activation of peripheral opioid receptors. Since this occurs at concentrations that do not cause central opioid effects, M6G might be useful as a peripheral opioid analgesic.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. E. Durieux
Peripheral analgesic receptor systems.
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2006; 97(3): 273 - 274.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. L. A. van Dorp, R. Romberg, E. Sarton, J. G. Bovill, and A. Dahan
Morphine-6-Glucuronide: Morphine's Successor for Postoperative Pain Relief?
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1789 - 1797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
I. Bileviciute-Ljungar, M. Spetea, Y. Guo, J. Schutz, P. Windisch, and H. Schmidhammer
Peripherally Mediated Antinociception of the {micro}-Opioid Receptor Agonist 2-[(4,5{alpha}-Epoxy-3-hydroxy-14beta-methoxy-17-methylmorphinan-6beta-yl)amino]acetic Acid (HS-731) after Subcutaneous and Oral Administration in Rats with Carrageenan-Induced Hindpaw Inflammation
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2006; 317(1): 220 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. Furst, P. Riba, T. Friedmann, J. Timar, M. Al-Khrasani, I. Obara, W. Makuch, M. Spetea, J. Schutz, R. Przewlocki, et al.
Peripheral versus Central Antinociceptive Actions of 6-Amino Acid-Substituted Derivatives of 14-O-Methyloxymorphone in Acute and Inflammatory Pain in the Rat
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2005; 312(2): 609 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.