Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on September 10, 2004
Brain 2004 127(10):2331-2338; doi:10.1093/brain/awh247
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
127/10/2331    most recent
awh247v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Younes-Mhenni, S.
Right arrow Articles by Honnorat, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Younes-Mhenni, S.
Right arrow Articles by Honnorat, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain Vol. 127 No. 10 © Guarantors of Brain 2004; all rights reserved

FDG-PET improves tumour detection in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

S. Younes-Mhenni1, M. F. Janier2, L. Cinotti2, J. C. Antoine3, F. Tronc4, V. Cottin5, P. J. Ternamian6, P. Trouillas1 and J. Honnorat1

1 Neurology B, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer, Université Claude Bernard, 2 CREATIS, CERMEP, 3 Department of Neurology, Hôpital Bellevue, Saint-Etienne, 4 Department of Thoracic Surgery, 5 Department of Pneumology and 6 Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cardiologique, Lyon, France

Correspondence to: Dr J. Honnorat, Neurologie B, Hôpital Neurologique, 59 Bd Pinel, 69677 Bron, France E-mail: jerome.honnorat{at}chu-lyon.fr

To determine the usefulness of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) whole body FDG-PET in the diagnosis of tumours in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS), we prospectively studied 20 patients with paraneoplastic antibodies in whom conventional imaging gave negative or inconclusive results for the presence of tumour. All 20 patients had neurological manifestations compatible with PNS and well-characterized paraneoplastic antibodies (12 anti-Hu, one anti-Hu and anti-CV2, one anti-CV2, four anti-Yo, one anti-Ri and one anti-amphiphysin). The mean delay between the onset of neurological symptoms and FDG-PET was 10 months (range 1–54). In these 20 patients, abnormal uptake was demonstrated in 18 patients, with some patients having abnormal signal in several areas. We observed abnormal uptake in the mediastinum (13 cases), lung (two cases), breast (two cases), parotid gland (one case), or the cervical, supraclavicular or axillary lymph nodes (seven cases). Following FDG-PET, the histological diagnosis of the tumour was made in 14 patients (small cell lung carcinoma in eight cases, breast adenocarcinoma in two, lung adenocarcinoma in two, axillary metastasis of ovary carcinoma in one, and malignant thymoma in one). Two other patients with abnormal FDG uptake showed radiological evidence of lung cancer, but a histological diagnosis could not be obtained. In two other patients, initial FDG-PET showed abnormal FDG uptake that was not confirmed a few months later by repeat FDG-PET. In the two patients with negative FDG-PET, peritoneal carcinomatosis was diagnosed in one and no tumour was found in the other. In our series, the sensitivity of FDG-PET for tumour detection was >83% demonstrating a clear role of this technique in the management of patients with PNS. However, in our series, the specificity of FDG uptake was only 25% due to unexplained abnormal FDG uptake in three patients and in abnormal FDG uptake due to a benign tumour in one patient. Over the study period, we saw 73 other patients with PNS and paraneoplastic antibodies. A tumour was demonstrated in 71 out of 73 by conventional techniques. Since false-positive and false-negative results are possible with FDG-PET and in most patients with PNS, the tumour is demonstrated by conventional techniques, we believe that FDG-PET should be reserved, at the moment, for patients with well-defined PNS antibodies when conventional imaging fails to identify a tumour or when lesions are difficult to biopsy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJ Case ReportsHome page
J. Novy, A. Carota, P. Eggimann, M. Pusztaszeri, A. O Rossetti, and R. Du Pasquier
Encephalitis with herpes simplex-2 in the cerebrospinal fluid and anti-RI (ANNA-2) antibodies: an infectious or a paraneoplastic syndrome?
BMJ Case Reports, August 11, 2009; 2009(aug11_1): bcr1220081363 - bcr1220081363.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. J. Titulaer, P. W. Wirtz, L. N.A. Willems, K. W. van Kralingen, P. A.E. S. Smitt, and J. J.G.M. Verschuuren
Screening for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Follow-Up Study of Patients With Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2008; 26(26): 4276 - 4281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PNHome page
S H Wong, M Boggild, T P Enevoldson, and N A Fletcher
Myelopathy but normal MRI: where next?
Practical Neurology, April 1, 2008; 8(2): 90 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. M. Mathew, R. Vandenberghe, A. Garcia-Merino, T. Yamamoto, J. C. Landolfi, M. R. Rosenfeld, J. E. Rossi, B. Thiessen, E. J. Dropcho, and J. Dalmau
Orchiectomy for suspected microscopic tumor in patients with anti-Ma2-associated encephalitis
Neurology, March 20, 2007; 68(12): 900 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Dalmau, R. G. Gonzalez, and M. F. Lerwill
Case 4-2007 -- A 56-Year-Old Woman with Rapidly Progressive Vertigo and Ataxia
N. Engl. J. Med., February 8, 2007; 356(6): 612 - 620.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J Honnorat
Understanding the physiopathology of paraneoplastic and genetic cerebellar ataxia.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2006; 77(12): 1299 - 1300.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
R Scheid, R Voltz, S Briest, R Kluge, and D Y von Cramon
Clinical insights into paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2006; 77(4): 529 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. W. de Beukelaar and P. A. S. Smitt
Managing paraneoplastic neurological disorders.
Oncologist, March 1, 2006; 11(3): 292 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
FDG-PET Improves Tumor Detection in Select Patients with Paraneoplastic Syndromes
Journal Watch Neurology, November 29, 2004; 2004(1129): 7 - 7.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.