Brain Advance Access originally published online on February 25, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brain, Vol. 127, No. 5, 1108-1126, 2004
© 2004 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awh135
Impulsivity, time perception, emotion and reinforcement sensitivity in patients with orbitofrontal cortex lesions
1 University of Oxford, Department of Experimental Psychology and 2 Oxford Centre for Enablement, Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, UK
Correspondence to: Professor E. T. Rolls, University of Oxford, Department of Experimental Psychology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK E-mail: edmund.rolls{at}psy.ox.ac.uk
Damage to the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in humans has been associated with disinhibited or socially inappropriate behaviour and emotional changes. Some of the changes may be related to difficulty in responding correctly to rewards and punishers, in that these patients have difficulty in learning to correct their choice of a visual stimulus when it is no longer associated with reward. We extend this fundamental approach by investigating the relationship between frontal dysfunction and impulsive behaviour, the behavioural, emotional and personality changes seen in patients with prefrontal cortex damage, and thus in addition illuminate the cognitive and biological processes that are impaired in impulsive people. OFC patients (n = 23) performed more impulsively on both self-report and cognitive/behavioural tests of impulsivity, reported more inappropriate frontal behaviours, and performed worse on a stimulusreinforcement association reversal task, than non-OFC prefrontal cortex lesion control (n = 20) and normal control (n = 39) participants. Further, OFC patients experienced more subjective anger than non-OFC and normal participants, and less subjective happiness than normals; and had a faster subjective sense of time (overestimated and underproduced time intervals) than normal controls, while non-OFC patients did not differ from normals. Finally, both OFC and non-OFC patients were less open to experience than normal participants. There were no differences between OFC patients, non-OFC lesion patients and normal controls on all other personality traits, most notably extraversion. In a spatial working memory task, the non-OFC group, most of whom had dorsolateral prefrontal cortex lesions, were impaired in that they repeatedly returned to previously chosen empty locations (within errors), whereas OFC patients were not impaired on this measure. Thus there is a dissociation between the effects of OFC damage which does not affect this measure of spatial working memory but does affect impulsive and inappropriate behaviour, reversal, personality, time perception and emotion; and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex damage which does affect this measure of spatial working memory, but not impulsive and inappropriate behaviour, reversal, personality, time perception and emotion. The effects of OFC damage on impulsive and related behaviours described here have implications for understanding impulsive behaviour.
Key Words: impulsivity; time perception; emotion; personality; orbitofrontal cortex
Abbreviations: ACA= anterior communicaing artery; BIS = Barrat Impulsiveness Scale; DLFC = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; MCA = middle cerebral artery; MFFT = Matching Familiar Figures Test; OFC = orbitofrontal cortex; PFC = prefrontal cortex; SWM = spatial working memory
Received July 10, 2003. Accepted December 27, 2003.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. W. Meeks and D. V. Jeste Neurobiology of Wisdom: A Literature Overview Arch Gen Psychiatry, April 1, 2009; 66(4): 355 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Boes, A. Bechara, D. Tranel, S. W. Anderson, L. Richman, and P. Nopoulos Right ventromedial prefrontal cortex: a neuroanatomical correlate of impulse control in boys Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, March 1, 2009; 4(1): 1 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Klapproth Time and decision making in humans Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, December 1, 2008; 8(4): 509 - 524. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Clark, A. Bechara, H. Damasio, M. R. F. Aitken, B. J. Sahakian, and T. W. Robbins Differential effects of insular and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions on risky decision-making Brain, May 1, 2008; 131(5): 1311 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Boettiger, J. M. Mitchell, V. C. Tavares, M. Robertson, G. Joslyn, M. D'Esposito, and H. L. Fields Immediate Reward Bias in Humans: Fronto-Parietal Networks and a Role for the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase 158Val/Val Genotype J. Neurosci., December 26, 2007; 27(52): 14383 - 14391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. S. Hoffer, S. L. Allen, and M. Mathews Treatment of Psychiatric Symptoms Associated With a Frontal Lobe Tumor Through Surgical Resection Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 2007; 164(6): 877 - 882. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Koenigs and D. Tranel Irrational Economic Decision-Making after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game J. Neurosci., January 24, 2007; 27(4): 951 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Fellows Deciding how to decide: ventromedial frontal lobe damage affects information acquisition in multi-attribute decision making Brain, April 1, 2006; 129(4): 944 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Berlin, E. T. Rolls, and S. D. Iversen Borderline Personality Disorder, Impulsivity, and the Orbitofrontal Cortex Am J Psychiatry, December 1, 2005; 162(12): 2360 - 2373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Fellows The Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Decision Making: A Review and Conceptual Framework Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, September 1, 2004; 3(3): 159 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||






