Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on June 30, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
127/8/1887    most recent
awh212v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziemann, U.
Right arrow Articles by Meintzschel, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ziemann, U.
Right arrow Articles by Meintzschel, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 127, No. 8, 1887-1898, August 2004
© 2004 Guarantors of Brain
doi: 10.1093/brain/awh212

Cortico-motoneuronal excitation of three hand muscles determined by a novel penta-stimulation technique

Ulf Ziemann, Tihomir V. Ilic, Henrik Alle and Frank Meintzschel

Motor Cortex Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Correspondence to: Ulf Ziemann, Motor Cortex Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University of Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2–16, D-60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany E-mail: u.ziemann{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de

The cortico-motoneuronal system (CMS), i.e. the monosynaptic projection from primary motor cortex to motoneurons in lamina IX of the spinal cord is, among all mammals, best developed in humans. Increasing evidence suggests that the CMS is crucially important for skilled individuated finger movements. Little is known about to what extent the strength of the CMS differs between hand muscles. Here we measured CMS excitation to the first dorsal interosseus (FDI), abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles in healthy subjects by using a novel penta-stimulation technique (PST) and single motor unit (SMU) recordings. The PST is an extension of the triple-stimulation technique. It applies two additional supramaximal electrical stimuli at the wrist to the ‘peripheral nerve of no interest’ (in the case of the FDI and ADM the median nerve, in the case of the APB the ulnar nerve) to collide with the descending volleys in that nerve elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex and electrical stimulation of Erb's point. This eliminates volume conduction from neighbouring muscles innervated by the nerve of no interest and, therefore, allows accurate determination of the PST response. The PST response was significantly larger in the FDI compared with the ADM and APB. This was validated by the SMU recordings, which showed a higher estimated amplitude of the mean compound excitatory postsynaptic potential in spinal motoneurons of the FDI than in those of the APB and ADM. Finally, as a possible functional correlate, the maximum rate of repetitive voluntary finger movements was higher for index finger abduction (prime mover, FDI) than for little finger abduction (prime mover, ADM) and thumb abduction (prime mover, APB), and individual differences in maximum rate between the different movements correlated with individual differences in the corresponding PST responses. In conclusion, PST is a valuable novel method for accurate quantification of CMS excitation. The findings strongly suggest that CMS excitation differs between hand muscles and that these differences directly link to capability differences in individuated finger movements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.